Earnings Growth of 2.3% Over 5 Years Hasn't Been Enough to Translate Into Positive Returns for PROG Holdings (NYSE:PRG) Shareholders
Earnings Growth of 2.3% Over 5 Years Hasn't Been Enough to Translate Into Positive Returns for PROG Holdings (NYSE:PRG) Shareholders
For many, the main point of investing is to generate higher returns than the overall market. But every investor is virtually certain to have both over-performing and under-performing stocks. At this point some shareholders may be questioning their investment in PROG Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:PRG), since the last five years saw the share price fall 46%.
對於許多人來說,投資的要點是產生比整個市場更高的回報。但是,幾乎每個投資者都肯定會有表現過硬和表現不佳的股票。目前,一些股東可能會質疑他們對PROG控股公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:PRG)的投資,因爲在過去五年中,股價下跌了46%。
After losing 4.3% this past week, it's worth investigating the company's fundamentals to see what we can infer from past performance.
在上週下跌4.3%之後,值得調查該公司的基本面,以了解我們可以從過去的表現中推斷出什麼。
While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time.
雖然市場是一種強大的定價機制,但股價反映了投資者的情緒,而不僅僅是潛在的業務表現。通過比較每股收益(EPS)和一段時間內的股價變化,我們可以了解投資者對公司的態度是如何隨着時間的推移而變化的。
While the share price declined over five years, PROG Holdings actually managed to increase EPS by an average of 12% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Or possibly, the market was previously very optimistic, so the stock has disappointed, despite improving EPS.
儘管股價在五年內下跌,但PROG Holdings實際上設法做到了 增加 每股收益平均每年增長12%。鑑於股價的反應,人們可能會懷疑每股收益並不能很好地指導該期間的業務表現(可能是由於一次性的虧損或收益)。或者,市場此前可能非常樂觀,因此儘管每股收益有所改善,但該股還是令人失望。
Because of the sharp contrast between the EPS growth rate and the share price growth, we're inclined to look to other metrics to understand the changing market sentiment around the stock.
由於每股收益增長率與股價增長形成鮮明對比,我們傾向於參考其他指標來了解圍繞該股的市場情緒變化。
We don't think that the 1.6% is big factor in the share price, since it's quite small, as dividends go. The revenue decline of 2.8% isn't too bad. But it's quite possible the market had expected better; a closer look at the revenue trends might explain the pessimism.
我們認爲1.6%不是影響股價的重要因素,因爲隨着股息的增加,它相當小。2.8%的收入下降還不錯。但是市場很可能預期會好轉;仔細觀察收入趨勢也許可以解釋這種悲觀情緒。
The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).
下圖描述了收入和收入隨時間推移而發生的變化(點擊圖片即可顯示確切的數值)。
We know that PROG Holdings has improved its bottom line lately, but what does the future have in store? This free report showing analyst forecasts should help you form a view on PROG Holdings
我們知道PROG Holdings最近提高了利潤,但是未來會發生什麼?這份顯示分析師預測的免費報告應該可以幫助您對PROG Holdings形成看法
What About Dividends?
分紅呢?
As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. In the case of PROG Holdings, it has a TSR of -35% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!
除了衡量股價回報率外,投資者還應考慮股東總回報率(TSR)。儘管股價回報率僅反映股價的變化,但股東總回報率包括股息的價值(假設已進行再投資)以及任何折扣融資或分拆的收益。可以說,股東總回報率更全面地描述了股票產生的回報。就PROG Holdings而言,其在過去5年的股東總回報率爲-35%。這超過了我們之前提到的其股價回報率。而且,猜測股息支付在很大程度上解釋了這種分歧是沒有好處的!
A Different Perspective
不同的視角
PROG Holdings provided a TSR of 22% over the last twelve months. But that return falls short of the market. But at least that's still a gain! Over five years the TSR has been a reduction of 6% per year, over five years. So this might be a sign the business has turned its fortunes around. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with PROG Holdings , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
在過去的十二個月中,PROG控股公司的股東回報率爲22%。但是這種回報不及市場。但至少這還是個好處!在過去的五年中,股東總回報率在五年內每年下降6%。因此,這可能表明該企業已經扭轉了命運。我發現將長期股價視爲業務績效的代表非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向PROG Holdings確定了3個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings.
如果你想看看另一家公司——一家財務狀況可能優異的公司——那麼千萬不要錯過這份已經證明自己可以增加收益的公司的免費名單。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
請注意,本文引用的市場回報反映了目前在美國交易所交易的股票的市場加權平均回報。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。