Earnings Growth of 2.3% Over 5 Years Hasn't Been Enough to Translate Into Positive Returns for PROG Holdings (NYSE:PRG) Shareholders
Earnings Growth of 2.3% Over 5 Years Hasn't Been Enough to Translate Into Positive Returns for PROG Holdings (NYSE:PRG) Shareholders
For many, the main point of investing is to generate higher returns than the overall market. But every investor is virtually certain to have both over-performing and under-performing stocks. At this point some shareholders may be questioning their investment in PROG Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:PRG), since the last five years saw the share price fall 46%.
对于许多人来说,投资的要点是产生比整个市场更高的回报。但是,几乎每个投资者都肯定会有表现过硬和表现不佳的股票。目前,一些股东可能会质疑他们对PROG控股公司(纽约证券交易所代码:PRG)的投资,因为在过去五年中,股价下跌了46%。
After losing 4.3% this past week, it's worth investigating the company's fundamentals to see what we can infer from past performance.
在上周下跌4.3%之后,值得调查该公司的基本面,以了解我们可以从过去的表现中推断出什么。
While markets are a powerful pricing mechanism, share prices reflect investor sentiment, not just underlying business performance. By comparing earnings per share (EPS) and share price changes over time, we can get a feel for how investor attitudes to a company have morphed over time.
虽然市场是一种强大的定价机制,但股价反映了投资者的情绪,而不仅仅是潜在的业务表现。通过比较每股收益(EPS)和一段时间内的股价变化,我们可以了解投资者对公司的态度是如何随着时间的推移而变化的。
While the share price declined over five years, PROG Holdings actually managed to increase EPS by an average of 12% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Or possibly, the market was previously very optimistic, so the stock has disappointed, despite improving EPS.
尽管股价在五年内下跌,但PROG Holdings实际上设法做到了 增加 每股收益平均每年增长12%。鉴于股价的反应,人们可能会怀疑每股收益并不能很好地指导该期间的业务表现(可能是由于一次性的亏损或收益)。或者,市场此前可能非常乐观,因此尽管每股收益有所改善,但该股还是令人失望。
Because of the sharp contrast between the EPS growth rate and the share price growth, we're inclined to look to other metrics to understand the changing market sentiment around the stock.
由于每股收益增长率与股价增长形成鲜明对比,我们倾向于参考其他指标来了解围绕该股的市场情绪变化。
We don't think that the 1.6% is big factor in the share price, since it's quite small, as dividends go. The revenue decline of 2.8% isn't too bad. But it's quite possible the market had expected better; a closer look at the revenue trends might explain the pessimism.
我们认为1.6%不是影响股价的重要因素,因为随着股息的增加,它相当小。2.8%的收入下降还不错。但是市场很可能预期会好转;仔细观察收入趋势也许可以解释这种悲观情绪。
The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).
下图描述了收入和收入随时间推移而发生的变化(点击图片即可显示确切的数值)。
We know that PROG Holdings has improved its bottom line lately, but what does the future have in store? This free report showing analyst forecasts should help you form a view on PROG Holdings
我们知道PROG Holdings最近提高了利润,但是未来会发生什么?这份显示分析师预测的免费报告应该可以帮助您对PROG Holdings形成看法
What About Dividends?
分红呢?
As well as measuring the share price return, investors should also consider the total shareholder return (TSR). Whereas the share price return only reflects the change in the share price, the TSR includes the value of dividends (assuming they were reinvested) and the benefit of any discounted capital raising or spin-off. Arguably, the TSR gives a more comprehensive picture of the return generated by a stock. In the case of PROG Holdings, it has a TSR of -35% for the last 5 years. That exceeds its share price return that we previously mentioned. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!
除了衡量股价回报率外,投资者还应考虑股东总回报率(TSR)。尽管股价回报率仅反映股价的变化,但股东总回报率包括股息的价值(假设已进行再投资)以及任何折扣融资或分拆的收益。可以说,股东总回报率更全面地描述了股票产生的回报。就PROG Holdings而言,其在过去5年的股东总回报率为-35%。这超过了我们之前提到的其股价回报率。而且,猜测股息支付在很大程度上解释了这种分歧是没有好处的!
A Different Perspective
不同的视角
PROG Holdings provided a TSR of 22% over the last twelve months. But that return falls short of the market. But at least that's still a gain! Over five years the TSR has been a reduction of 6% per year, over five years. So this might be a sign the business has turned its fortunes around. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with PROG Holdings , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
在过去的十二个月中,PROG控股公司的股东回报率为22%。但是这种回报不及市场。但至少这还是个好处!在过去的五年中,股东总回报率在五年内每年下降6%。因此,这可能表明该企业已经扭转了命运。我发现将长期股价视为业务绩效的代表非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,投资风险的幽灵无处不在。我们已经向PROG Holdings确定了3个警告信号,了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。
If you would prefer to check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of companies that have proven they can grow earnings.
如果你想看看另一家公司——一家财务状况可能优异的公司——那么千万不要错过这份已经证明自己可以增加收益的公司的免费名单。
Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on American exchanges.
请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在美国交易所交易的股票的市场加权平均回报。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。