Googol Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301510) Stock Price Dropped 6.7% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy
Googol Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:301510) Stock Price Dropped 6.7% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy
Key Insights
关键见解
- The considerable ownership by private companies in Googol Technology indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 5 shareholders own 54% of the company
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 私营公司对Googol Technology的大量所有权表明,它们在管理和业务战略方面共同拥有更大的发言权
- 前五名股东拥有公司54%的股份
- 公司过去的表现以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有一个很好的了解
If you want to know who really controls Googol Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:301510), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 43% to be precise, is private companies. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道谁真正控制了谷歌科技有限公司(深圳证券交易所代码:301510),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。持有该公司股份最多的集团是私营公司,准确地说约为43%。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果出现低迷,则损失最大)。
As a result, private companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥928m.
结果,在市值下降9.28亿元人民币之后,私营公司作为一个整体承受了最大的损失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Googol Technology, beginning with the chart below.
让我们从下图开始,深入研究Googol Technology的每种类型的所有者。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240312/0-6a4ba07d42f7ba6fcad5340494044434-0-727e351928038264dbc035ac93d072d1.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Googol Technology?
关于Googol技术,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Googol Technology. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Googol Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如您所见,机构投资者持有Googol Technology的大量股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎行事,不要依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们也是,有时候会弄错。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Googol Technology的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240312/0-6a4ba07d42f7ba6fcad5340494044434-1-8cc0ca5cf67bff11ed0e425963e1ea1b.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Googol Technology. Our data shows that Googol Technology (HK) Limited is the largest shareholder with 23% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.7% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.9% by the third-largest shareholder.
我们注意到,对冲基金没有对谷歌科技进行有意义的投资。我们的数据显示,谷歌科技(香港)有限公司是最大股东,已发行股份的23%。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约9.7%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有7.9%的所有权。
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 54% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
我们的研究还揭示了这样一个事实,即公司约有54%的股份由前五名股东控制,这表明这些所有者对业务具有重大影响。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。据我们所知,没有分析师对该公司进行报道,因此它可能处于雷达之下。
Insider Ownership Of Googol Technology
谷歌科技的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同国家对内部人士的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是计算在内。公司管理层对董事会的回答,董事会应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也在董事会中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Googol Technology Co., Ltd.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own CN¥812m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们可以报告说,内部人士确实拥有谷歌科技有限公司的股份。这是一家大公司,因此很高兴看到这种一致性。内部人士拥有价值8.12亿元人民币的股票(按当前价格计算)。大多数人会说,这表明股东和董事会之间的利益一致。尽管如此,可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 29% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司29%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这个团体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股权所有权
With a stake of 17%, private equity firms could influence the Googol Technology board. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
私募股权公司持有17%的股份,可能会影响谷歌科技董事会。有时我们会看到私募股权长期存在,但总的来说,它们的投资期限较短,而且顾名思义,对上市公司的投资并不多。一段时间后,他们可能会考虑出售资本并将其重新部署到其他地方。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 43%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我们的数据显示,私营公司持有公司43%的股份。仅凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私营公司。有时,内部人士或其他关联方通过一家独立的私人公司对上市公司的股份拥有权益。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Googol Technology you should be aware of, and 1 of them is significant.
我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。一个很好的例子:我们发现了你应该注意的3个谷歌科技警告信号,其中一个信号很重要。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
当然,这可能不是最值得买入的股票。因此,来看看这份免费的有趣公司名单吧。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。