Is Dana Incorporated's (NYSE:DAN) 2.6% ROE Worse Than Average?
Is Dana Incorporated's (NYSE:DAN) 2.6% ROE Worse Than Average?
Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand Dana Incorporated (NYSE:DAN).
许多投资者仍在学习分析股票时可能有用的各种指标。本文适用于那些想了解股本回报率(ROE)的人。为了使课程以实用为基础,我们将使用投资回报率来更好地了解达纳公司(纽约证券交易所代码:DAN)。
Return on equity or ROE is an important factor to be considered by a shareholder because it tells them how effectively their capital is being reinvested. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments.
股本回报率或投资回报率是股东需要考虑的重要因素,因为它可以告诉他们资本再投资的有效性。简而言之,投资回报率显示了每美元从其股东投资中产生的利润。
How To Calculate Return On Equity?
如何计算股本回报率?
Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula:
股本回报率可以使用以下公式计算:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股本回报率 = 净利润(来自持续经营业务)÷ 股东权益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Dana is:
因此,根据上述公式,Dana的投资回报率为:
2.6% = US$48m ÷ US$1.8b (Based on the trailing twelve months to December 2023).
2.6% = 4,800万美元 ÷ 18亿美元(基于截至2023年12月的过去十二个月)。
The 'return' refers to a company's earnings over the last year. Another way to think of that is that for every $1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn $0.03 in profit.
“回报” 是指公司去年的收益。另一种看法是,每持有价值1美元的股权,该公司就能获得0.03美元的利润。
Does Dana Have A Good Return On Equity?
达娜的股本回报率高吗?
Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see Dana has a lower ROE than the average (12%) in the Auto Components industry classification.
可以说,评估公司投资回报率的最简单方法是将其与行业平均水平进行比较。重要的是,这远非一个完美的衡量标准,因为各公司在相同的行业分类中差异很大。如果你看下图,你会发现Dana的投资回报率低于汽车零部件行业分类中的平均水平(12%)。
That's not what we like to see. Although, we think that a lower ROE could still mean that a company has the opportunity to better its returns with the use of leverage, provided its existing debt levels are low. A company with high debt levels and low ROE is a combination we like to avoid given the risk involved. Our risks dashboard should have the 2 risks we have identified for Dana.
这不是我们喜欢看到的。但是,我们认为,只要现有债务水平较低,较低的投资回报率仍可能意味着公司有机会通过使用杠杆提高回报。鉴于所涉及的风险,高债务水平和低投资回报率的公司是我们希望避免的组合。我们的风险仪表板应包含我们为Dana确定的两种风险。
How Does Debt Impact ROE?
债务如何影响投资回报率?
Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.
大多数公司需要来自某个地方的钱来增加利润。这些现金可以来自发行股票、留存收益或债务。在第一和第二种情况下,投资回报率将反映出现金投资业务的使用情况。在后一种情况下,用于增长的债务将提高回报,但不会影响总权益。因此,债务的使用可以提高投资回报率,尽管比喻地说,在暴风雨天气中还会带来额外的风险。
Dana's Debt And Its 2.6% ROE
达娜的债务及其2.6%的投资回报率
Dana clearly uses a high amount of debt to boost returns, as it has a debt to equity ratio of 1.44. Its ROE is quite low, even with the use of significant debt; that's not a good result, in our opinion. Debt does bring extra risk, so it's only really worthwhile when a company generates some decent returns from it.
达纳显然使用大量债务来提高回报,因为其负债权益比率为1.44。即使使用了巨额债务,其投资回报率也相当低;在我们看来,这不是一个好结果。债务确实会带来额外的风险,因此只有当公司从中获得可观的回报时,债务才是真正值得的。
Conclusion
结论
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. Companies that can achieve high returns on equity without too much debt are generally of good quality. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.
股本回报率对于比较不同业务的质量很有用。能够在不负债过多的情况下获得高股本回报的公司通常质量很好。如果两家公司的债务与股权比率大致相同,而一家公司的投资回报率更高,那么我通常更喜欢投资回报率更高的那家公司。
But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. So you might want to take a peek at this data-rich interactive graph of forecasts for the company.
但是,当企业质量很高时,市场通常会以反映这一点的价格出价。与股票价格所反映的预期相比,利润增长率尤其值得考虑。因此,你可能想看看这张数据丰富的公司预测交互式图表。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
当然,通过寻找其他地方,你可能会找到一笔不错的投资。因此,来看看这份有趣的公司的免费清单吧。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。