share_log

Lincoln Educational Services' (NASDAQ:LINC) Earnings Aren't As Good As They Appear

Lincoln Educational Services' (NASDAQ:LINC) Earnings Aren't As Good As They Appear

林肯教育服务公司(纳斯达克股票代码:LINC)的收益没有看起来那么好
Simply Wall St ·  03/15 15:15

Even though Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (NASDAQ:LINC) posted strong earnings recently, the stock hasn't reacted in a large way. We looked deeper into the numbers and found that shareholders might be concerned with some underlying weaknesses.

尽管林肯教育服务公司(纳斯达克股票代码:LINC)最近公布了强劲的收益,但该股的反应并不大。我们更深入地研究了这些数字,发现股东可能会担心一些潜在的弱点。

earnings-and-revenue-history
NasdaqGS:LINC Earnings and Revenue History March 15th 2024
NASDAQGS: LINC 收益和收入历史记录 2024 年 3 月 15 日

Zooming In On Lincoln Educational Services' Earnings

放大林肯教育服务的收入

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.

在高级财务中,用于衡量公司将报告的利润转化为自由现金流(FCF)的关键比率是应计比率(来自现金流)。简而言之,该比率从净利润中减去FCF,然后将该数字除以该时期公司的平均运营资产。该比率向我们显示了公司的利润超过其FCF的程度。

Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

因此,当公司的应计比率为负时,这实际上被认为是一件好事,但是如果应计比率为正,则被认为是一件坏事。这并不意味着我们应该担心应计比率为正,但值得注意的是,应计比率相当高的地方。值得注意的是,有一些学术证据表明,总的来说,高应计比率对短期利润来说是个坏兆头。

For the year to December 2023, Lincoln Educational Services had an accrual ratio of 0.47. As a general rule, that bodes poorly for future profitability. And indeed, during the period the company didn't produce any free cash flow whatsoever. Over the last year it actually had negative free cash flow of US$15m, in contrast to the aforementioned profit of US$26.0m. Coming off the back of negative free cash flow last year, we imagine some shareholders might wonder if its cash burn of US$15m, this year, indicates high risk. Having said that, there is more to the story. The accrual ratio is reflecting the impact of unusual items on statutory profit, at least in part.

在截至2023年12月的一年中,林肯教育服务的应计比率为0.47。通常,这对未来的盈利能力来说是个坏兆头。事实上,在此期间,该公司没有产生任何自由现金流。在过去的一年里,它实际上有 负面的 自由现金流为1500万美元,而上述利润为2600万美元。在去年自由现金流为负的背景下,我们想象一些股东可能会怀疑其今年1500万美元的现金消耗是否表明存在高风险。话虽如此,故事还有更多。应计比率至少部分反映了不寻常项目对法定利润的影响。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

这可能会让你想知道分析师对未来盈利能力的预测。幸运的是,您可以单击此处查看根据他们的估计描绘未来盈利能力的交互式图表。

How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit?

不寻常的物品如何影响利润?

Given the accrual ratio, it's not overly surprising that Lincoln Educational Services' profit was boosted by unusual items worth US$27m in the last twelve months. While we like to see profit increases, we tend to be a little more cautious when unusual items have made a big contribution. We ran the numbers on most publicly listed companies worldwide, and it's very common for unusual items to be once-off in nature. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. Lincoln Educational Services had a rather significant contribution from unusual items relative to its profit to December 2023. All else being equal, this would likely have the effect of making the statutory profit a poor guide to underlying earnings power.

考虑到应计比率,在过去十二个月中,价值2700万美元的不寻常项目提振了林肯教育服务的利润也就不足为奇了。虽然我们希望看到利润增加,但当不寻常的物品做出重大贡献时,我们往往会更加谨慎一些。我们统计了全球大多数上市公司的数字,不寻常的物品在自然界中很常见。而且,毕竟,这正是会计术语的含义。相对于其截至2023年12月的利润,林肯教育服务公司的不寻常项目做出了相当可观的贡献。在其他条件相同的情况下,这可能会使法定利润成为衡量潜在盈利能力的不良指导。

Our Take On Lincoln Educational Services' Profit Performance

我们对林肯教育服务盈利表现的看法

Lincoln Educational Services had a weak accrual ratio, but its profit did receive a boost from unusual items. On reflection, the above-mentioned factors give us the strong impression that Lincoln Educational Services'underlying earnings power is not as good as it might seem, based on the statutory profit numbers. If you'd like to know more about Lincoln Educational Services as a business, it's important to be aware of any risks it's facing. When we did our research, we found 3 warning signs for Lincoln Educational Services (2 are a bit concerning!) that we believe deserve your full attention.

林肯教育服务公司的应计比率较低,但其利润确实得到了不寻常项目的提振。经过反思,上述因素给我们留下了深刻的印象,即根据法定利润数字,林肯教育服务的潜在盈利能力并不像看起来那样好。如果您想进一步了解林肯教育服务作为一家企业,请务必了解其面临的任何风险。当我们进行研究时,我们发现了林肯教育服务的 3 个警告信号(2 个有点令人担忧!)我们认为值得你全神贯注。

Our examination of Lincoln Educational Services has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And, on that basis, we are somewhat skeptical. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying.

我们对林肯教育服务的审查侧重于某些可能使其收入看起来好于实际的因素。而且,在此基础上,我们有些怀疑。但是,如果你能够将注意力集中在细节上,总会有更多的事情需要发现。例如,许多人认为高股本回报率是有利的商业经济的标志,而另一些人则喜欢 “关注资金”,寻找内部人士正在买入的股票。因此,你可能希望看到这份免费收藏的拥有高股本回报率的公司,或者这份内部人士正在购买的股票清单。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发