share_log

Lincoln Educational Services' (NASDAQ:LINC) Earnings Aren't As Good As They Appear

Lincoln Educational Services' (NASDAQ:LINC) Earnings Aren't As Good As They Appear

林肯教育服務公司(納斯達克股票代碼:LINC)的收益沒有看起來那麼好
Simply Wall St ·  03/15 15:15

Even though Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (NASDAQ:LINC) posted strong earnings recently, the stock hasn't reacted in a large way. We looked deeper into the numbers and found that shareholders might be concerned with some underlying weaknesses.

儘管林肯教育服務公司(納斯達克股票代碼:LINC)最近公佈了強勁的收益,但該股的反應並不大。我們更深入地研究了這些數字,發現股東可能會擔心一些潛在的弱點。

earnings-and-revenue-history
NasdaqGS:LINC Earnings and Revenue History March 15th 2024
NASDAQGS: LINC 收益和收入歷史記錄 2024 年 3 月 15 日

Zooming In On Lincoln Educational Services' Earnings

放大林肯教育服務的收入

In high finance, the key ratio used to measure how well a company converts reported profits into free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio (from cashflow). In plain english, this ratio subtracts FCF from net profit, and divides that number by the company's average operating assets over that period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.

在高級財務中,用於衡量公司將報告的利潤轉化爲自由現金流(FCF)的關鍵比率是應計比率(來自現金流)。簡而言之,該比率從淨利潤中減去FCF,然後將該數字除以該時期公司的平均運營資產。該比率向我們顯示了公司的利潤超過其FCF的程度。

Therefore, it's actually considered a good thing when a company has a negative accrual ratio, but a bad thing if its accrual ratio is positive. That is not intended to imply we should worry about a positive accrual ratio, but it's worth noting where the accrual ratio is rather high. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.

因此,當公司的應計比率爲負時,這實際上被認爲是一件好事,但是如果應計比率爲正,則被認爲是一件壞事。這並不意味着我們應該擔心應計比率爲正,但值得注意的是,應計比率相當高的地方。值得注意的是,有一些學術證據表明,總的來說,高應計比率對短期利潤來說是個壞兆頭。

For the year to December 2023, Lincoln Educational Services had an accrual ratio of 0.47. As a general rule, that bodes poorly for future profitability. And indeed, during the period the company didn't produce any free cash flow whatsoever. Over the last year it actually had negative free cash flow of US$15m, in contrast to the aforementioned profit of US$26.0m. Coming off the back of negative free cash flow last year, we imagine some shareholders might wonder if its cash burn of US$15m, this year, indicates high risk. Having said that, there is more to the story. The accrual ratio is reflecting the impact of unusual items on statutory profit, at least in part.

在截至2023年12月的一年中,林肯教育服務的應計比率爲0.47。通常,這對未來的盈利能力來說是個壞兆頭。事實上,在此期間,該公司沒有產生任何自由現金流。在過去的一年裏,它實際上有 負面的 自由現金流爲1500萬美元,而上述利潤爲2600萬美元。在去年自由現金流爲負的背景下,我們想象一些股東可能會懷疑其今年1500萬美元的現金消耗是否表明存在高風險。話雖如此,故事還有更多。應計比率至少部分反映了不尋常項目對法定利潤的影響。

That might leave you wondering what analysts are forecasting in terms of future profitability. Luckily, you can click here to see an interactive graph depicting future profitability, based on their estimates.

這可能會讓你想知道分析師對未來盈利能力的預測。幸運的是,您可以單擊此處查看根據他們的估計描繪未來盈利能力的交互式圖表。

How Do Unusual Items Influence Profit?

不尋常的物品如何影響利潤?

Given the accrual ratio, it's not overly surprising that Lincoln Educational Services' profit was boosted by unusual items worth US$27m in the last twelve months. While we like to see profit increases, we tend to be a little more cautious when unusual items have made a big contribution. We ran the numbers on most publicly listed companies worldwide, and it's very common for unusual items to be once-off in nature. And, after all, that's exactly what the accounting terminology implies. Lincoln Educational Services had a rather significant contribution from unusual items relative to its profit to December 2023. All else being equal, this would likely have the effect of making the statutory profit a poor guide to underlying earnings power.

考慮到應計比率,在過去十二個月中,價值2700萬美元的不尋常項目提振了林肯教育服務的利潤也就不足爲奇了。雖然我們希望看到利潤增加,但當不尋常的物品做出重大貢獻時,我們往往會更加謹慎一些。我們統計了全球大多數上市公司的數字,不尋常的物品在自然界中很常見。而且,畢竟,這正是會計術語的含義。相對於其截至2023年12月的利潤,林肯教育服務公司的不尋常項目做出了相當可觀的貢獻。在其他條件相同的情況下,這可能會使法定利潤成爲衡量潛在盈利能力的不良指導。

Our Take On Lincoln Educational Services' Profit Performance

我們對林肯教育服務盈利表現的看法

Lincoln Educational Services had a weak accrual ratio, but its profit did receive a boost from unusual items. On reflection, the above-mentioned factors give us the strong impression that Lincoln Educational Services'underlying earnings power is not as good as it might seem, based on the statutory profit numbers. If you'd like to know more about Lincoln Educational Services as a business, it's important to be aware of any risks it's facing. When we did our research, we found 3 warning signs for Lincoln Educational Services (2 are a bit concerning!) that we believe deserve your full attention.

林肯教育服務公司的應計比率較低,但其利潤確實得到了不尋常項目的提振。經過反思,上述因素給我們留下了深刻的印象,即根據法定利潤數字,林肯教育服務的潛在盈利能力並不像看起來那樣好。如果您想進一步了解林肯教育服務作爲一家企業,請務必了解其面臨的任何風險。當我們進行研究時,我們發現了林肯教育服務的 3 個警告信號(2 個有點令人擔憂!)我們認爲值得你全神貫注。

Our examination of Lincoln Educational Services has focussed on certain factors that can make its earnings look better than they are. And, on that basis, we are somewhat skeptical. But there is always more to discover if you are capable of focussing your mind on minutiae. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. So you may wish to see this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying.

我們對林肯教育服務的審查側重於某些可能使其收入看起來好於實際的因素。而且,在此基礎上,我們有些懷疑。但是,如果你能夠將注意力集中在細節上,總會有更多的事情需要發現。例如,許多人認爲高股本回報率是有利的商業經濟的標誌,而另一些人則喜歡 “關注資金”,尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。因此,你可能希望看到這份免費收藏的擁有高股本回報率的公司,或者這份內部人士正在購買的股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論