share_log

Is Partners Value Investments LP (CVE:PVF.UN) Popular Amongst Insiders?

Is Partners Value Investments LP (CVE:PVF.UN) Popular Amongst Insiders?

Partners Value Investments LP(CVE:PVF.UN)在内部人士中受欢迎吗?
Simply Wall St. ·  2021/02/01 21:02

The big shareholder groups in Partners Value Investments LP (CVE:PVF.UN) have power over the company. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies. I quite like to see at least a little bit of insider ownership. As Charlie Munger said 'Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome.

Partners Value Investments LP(CVE:PVF.UN)的大股东集团对公司拥有控制权。机构通常持有较成熟公司的股票,而内部人士拥有相当一部分较小公司的情况并不少见。我非常希望看到至少有一点内部人持股。正如查理·芒格(Charlie Munger)所说,“给我看动机,我就会告诉你结果。”

With a market capitalization of CA$3.7b, Partners Value Investments is a decent size, so it is probably on the radar of institutional investors. Our analysis of the ownership of the company, below, shows that institutions are not on the share registry. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Partners Value Investments.

Partner Value Investments的市值为37亿加元,规模可观,因此可能受到机构投资者的关注。下面我们对公司所有权的分析表明,机构不在股票登记处。让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于Partner Value Investments的哪些信息。

Check out our latest analysis for Partners Value InvestmentsTSXV:PVF.UN Ownership Breakdown February 1st 2021What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Partners Value Investments?

查看我们对合作伙伴价值投资的最新分析TSXV:PVF.联合国所有权明细2021年2月1日关于合伙人价值投资,机构所有权的缺失告诉了我们什么?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我们不倾向于看到机构投资者持有风险很高、交易清淡或规模很小的公司的股票。虽然我们有时确实会看到大公司没有登记在册的机构,但这种情况并不特别常见。

There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Partners Value Investments' earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.TSXV:PVF.UN Earnings and Revenue Growth February 1st 2021

对于机构为何不持有股票,有多种解释。最常见的是,相对于管理下的资金,该公司规模太小,因此该机构不愿费心密切关注该公司。或者,该公司可能有某些方面让机构投资者望而却步。合作伙伴价值投资公司的收益和收入记录(见下文)可能对机构投资者没有说服力--或者他们可能只是没有仔细观察过业务。TSXV:PVF.UN收益和收入增长2021年2月1日

Partners Value Investments is not owned by hedge funds. Partners Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 50% of shares outstanding. With 5.0% and 2.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, Samuel Pollock and Partners (III) Limited are the second and third largest shareholders.

Partner Value Investments不属于对冲基金。Partner Limited目前是该公司的最大股东,持有50%的流通股。Samuel Pollock and Partners(III)Limited分别占已发行股份的5.0%和2.7%,是第二和第三大股东。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 55% stake.

对股东登记的更详细的研究表明,两个最大的股东通过他们55%的股份在公司拥有相当大的所有权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.Insider Ownership Of Partners Value Investments

研究机构持股是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的效果。目前我们没有得到任何分析师对该股的报道,因此该公司不太可能被广泛持有。合伙人价值投资的内部人持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同国家对内部人的定义可能略有不同,但董事会成员总是算数的。管理层最终要向董事会负责。然而,经理人担任执行董事会成员的情况并不少见,特别是如果他们是创始人或首席执行官的话。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部人持股是积极的,因为这可以表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。然而,在某些情况下,太多的权力集中在这个群体中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Partners Value Investments LP. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth CA$187m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.General Public Ownership

我们可以看到,内部人士持有Partners Value Investments LP的股份。内部人士持有价值1.87亿加元的可观股份。大多数人会认为这是一个真正的积极因素。很高兴看到内部人士的投资达到这样的水平。你可以查看这里,看看那些内部人士最近是否一直在买入。一般公有制

The general public holds a 42% stake in Partners Value Investments. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.Private Company Ownership

公众持有Partner Value Investments 42%的股份。虽然这个群体不一定能发号施令,但它肯定能对公司的运营方式产生真正的影响。私营公司所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 53%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.Next Steps:

我们的数据显示,私营公司持有该公司53%的股份。也许有必要对此进行更深入的研究。如果相关方,如内部人士,对在这些私营公司中,这一点应该在年报中披露。私营公司也可能对该公司拥有战略利益。接下来的步骤:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团是很值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。

Many find it usefulto take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access thisdetailed graphof past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

许多人认为它很有用。要深入了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以访问此详细图表过去的收益、收入和现金流。

Of coursethis may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see ourfreecollection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

当然了这可能不是最值得买的股票。。因此,您可能希望看到我们的免费令人感兴趣的潜在客户集合,拥有有利的财务状况。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用过去12个月的数据计算的,指的是截至财务报表日期的最后一个月的12个月期间。这可能与全年年报数据不一致。

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

这篇由《华尔街日报》撰写的文章本质上是笼统的。它不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也没有考虑你的目标或你的财务状况。我们的目标是为您带来由基本面数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不会将最新的对价格敏感的公司公告或定性材料考虑在内。简单地说,华尔街在提到的任何股票中都没有头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content?Get in touchwith us directly.Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

对这篇文章有什么反馈吗?担心内容吗?保持联系直接与我们联系。或者,也可以给编辑团队发电子邮件,地址是simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发