Textron Inc. (NYSE:TXT) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 87% of the Company
Textron Inc. (NYSE:TXT) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 87% of the Company
Key Insights
关键见解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Textron's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 10 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 高机构所有权意味着德事隆的股价对其交易行为很敏感
- 共有10名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为51%
- 分析师的预测以及所有权数据可以使人们对企业前景有深刻的了解
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Textron Inc. (NYSE:TXT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 87% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解谁真正控制了德事隆公司(纽约证券交易所代码:TXT),了解业务的所有权结构非常重要。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有87%所有权的机构。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将受益最大(如果股价下跌,则损失最大)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.
由于机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者而言。因此,向公司投资的大量机构资金通常被视为积极属性。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Textron.
在下图中,我们放大了德事隆的不同所有权组。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Textron?
关于德事隆,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Textron. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Textron's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
如您所见,机构投资者持有德事隆的大量股份。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看德事隆的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Textron. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 9.4% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 8.7% of the company stock.
投资者应注意,机构实际上拥有公司一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同行使巨大的权力。我们注意到,对冲基金没有对德事隆进行有意义的投资。Vanguard Group, Inc.目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份的12%。T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.是第二大股东,拥有9.4%的普通股,贝莱德公司持有该公司约8.7%的股份。
We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我们做了进一步的挖掘,发现10位大股东约占登记册的51%,这意味着除了较大的股东外,还有一些较小的股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Textron
德事隆的内部所有权
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。公司管理层对董事会负责,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员自己也是董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。
Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Textron Inc. in their own names. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$90m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的数据表明,内部人士以自己的名义拥有德事隆公司不到1%的股份。这是一家非常大的公司,因此看到内部人士拥有该公司的很大一部分股份会令人惊讶。尽管他们的持股量不到1%,但我们可以看到董事会成员共拥有价值9000万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。看到至少有一部分内部所有权总是件好事,但可能值得检查一下这些内部人士是否一直在出售。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 13% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Textron. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
德事隆拥有13%的所有权,主要由个人投资者组成的公众对德事隆有一定程度的影响力。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Textron better, we need to consider many other factors.
拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,为了更好地了解德事隆,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜欢更深入地了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以在这张详细图表中找到历史收入和收入。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。