Netac Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300042) Market Cap Dropped CN¥449m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt
Netac Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300042) Market Cap Dropped CN¥449m Last Week; Individual Investors Bore the Brunt
Key Insights
关键见解
- Netac Technology's significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- A total of 18 investors have a majority stake in the company with 42% ownership
- Insider ownership in Netac Technology is 12%
- Netac Technology拥有大量个人投资者的所有权,这表明关键决策受到广大公众股东的影响
- 共有18名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为42%
- Netac Technology的内部所有权为12%
If you want to know who really controls Netac Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300042), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道谁真正控制了Netac科技股份有限公司(深圳证券交易所代码:300042),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。我们可以看到,个人投资者拥有公司的大部分股份,所有权为58%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
And following last week's 8.1% decline in share price, individual investors suffered the most losses.
继上周股价下跌8.1%之后,个人投资者遭受的损失最大。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Netac Technology.
让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们关于Netac Technology的什么。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240411/0-080ff42321c1c72b84a30a17cfee0b74-0-85c6e60a1023969a695d228ba773026a.png/big)
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Netac Technology?
关于Netac技术,机构所有权告诉我们什么?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。
Institutions have a very small stake in Netac Technology. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. If the business gets stronger from here, we could see a situation where more institutions are keen to buy. When multiple institutional investors want to buy shares, we often see a rising share price. The past revenue trajectory (shown below) can be an indication of future growth, but there are no guarantees.
机构在Netac Technology中持有很小的股份。这表明该公司受到一些基金的关注,但目前在专业投资者中并不特别受欢迎。如果业务从此变得更加强大,我们可能会看到更多机构热衷于收购的情况。当多个机构投资者想要购买股票时,我们经常会看到股价上涨。过去的收入轨迹(如下所示)可以预示未来的增长,但无法保证。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240411/0-080ff42321c1c72b84a30a17cfee0b74-1-1ef6bdd91200549521abe41e994ff5f4.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Netac Technology. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Shaoguan Jinye Development Co., Ltd. with 25% of shares outstanding. With 9.2% and 2.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Guoshun Deng and Golden Eagle Asset Management Co. Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.
我们注意到,对冲基金没有对Netac Technology进行有意义的投资。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是韶关金业发展有限公司,其已发行股份的25%。邓国顺和金鹰资产管理有限公司分别持有9.2%和2.5%的已发行股份Ltd. 是第二和第三大股东。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 18 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
在研究我们的所有权数据时,我们发现18位最大股东共同拥有的股份登记册不到50%,这意味着没有一个人拥有多数股权。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但研究分析师的情绪以了解风向哪个方向吹来也是有意义的。分析师对该股的报道很少,但报道不多。因此,它还有获得更多报道的余地。
Insider Ownership Of Netac Technology
Netac Technology 的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Netac Technology Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥5.1b, and insiders have CN¥630m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有Netac科技有限公司合理比例的股份。它的市值仅为51亿元人民币,内部人士以自己的名义持有价值6.3亿元人民币的股票。我们可以说这表明了与股东的一致性,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然很小;一些内部人士可能已经创立了该公司。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人士是否在买入或卖出。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 58% stake in Netac Technology, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.
公众通常是个人投资者,持有Netac Technology58%的大量股份,这表明Netac Technology是一只相当受欢迎的股票。有了这么多的所有权,散户投资者可以在影响股东回报的决策中共同发挥作用,例如股息政策和董事任命。他们还可以行使权力,对可能不会提高盈利能力的收购或合并进行投票。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有权
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 26%, of the company's shares. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我们的数据表明,私人公司持有该公司26%的股份。私人公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过持有私营公司的股权而对上市公司感兴趣,而不是以个人身份获得权益。虽然很难得出任何广泛的中风结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个有待进一步研究的领域。
Next Steps:
后续步骤:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Netac Technology , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
尽管值得考虑拥有公司的不同群体,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,以永远存在的投资风险幽灵为例。我们已经确定了Netac Technology的1个警告信号,了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。