We Think Overseas Education's (SGX:RQ1) Profit Is Only A Baseline For What They Can Achieve
We Think Overseas Education's (SGX:RQ1) Profit Is Only A Baseline For What They Can Achieve
Even though Overseas Education Limited's (SGX:RQ1) recent earnings release was robust, the market didn't seem to notice. Our analysis suggests that investors might be missing some promising details.
儘管海外教育有限公司(新加坡證券交易所股票代碼:RQ1)最近發佈的業績表現強勁,但市場似乎沒有注意到。我們的分析表明,投資者可能遺漏了一些令人鼓舞的細節。
Zooming In On Overseas Education's Earnings
放大海外教育的收入
One key financial ratio used to measure how well a company converts its profit to free cash flow (FCF) is the accrual ratio. To get the accrual ratio we first subtract FCF from profit for a period, and then divide that number by the average operating assets for the period. The ratio shows us how much a company's profit exceeds its FCF.
用於衡量公司將其利潤轉化爲自由現金流(FCF)的效果的一個關鍵財務比率是應計比率。爲了獲得應計比率,我們首先從一段時間內的利潤中減去FCF,然後將該數字除以該期間的平均運營資產。該比率向我們顯示了公司的利潤超過其FCF的程度。
As a result, a negative accrual ratio is a positive for the company, and a positive accrual ratio is a negative. While having an accrual ratio above zero is of little concern, we do think it's worth noting when a company has a relatively high accrual ratio. Notably, there is some academic evidence that suggests that a high accrual ratio is a bad sign for near-term profits, generally speaking.
因此,負應計比率對公司來說是正數,而正應計比率是負數。雖然應計比率高於零並不令人擔憂,但我們確實認爲,當公司的應計比率相對較高時,值得注意。值得注意的是,有一些學術證據表明,總的來說,高應計率對短期利潤來說是個壞兆頭。
For the year to December 2023, Overseas Education had an accrual ratio of -0.10. That implies it has good cash conversion, and implies that its free cash flow solidly exceeded its profit last year. Indeed, in the last twelve months it reported free cash flow of S$25m, well over the S$6.73m it reported in profit. Overseas Education did see its free cash flow drop year on year, which is less than ideal, like a Simpson's episode without Groundskeeper Willie.
在截至2023年12月的一年中,海外教育的應計率爲-0.10。這意味着它具有良好的現金轉化率,也意味着其去年的自由現金流穩步超過了利潤。事實上,在過去的十二個月中,該公司報告的自由現金流爲2500萬新元,遠遠超過其公佈的673萬新元的利潤。海外教育的自由現金流確實同比下降,這並不理想,就像辛普森沒有場地管理員威利的劇集一樣。
Note: we always recommend investors check balance sheet strength. Click here to be taken to our balance sheet analysis of Overseas Education.
注意:我們始終建議投資者檢查資產負債表的實力。點擊此處查看我們的海外教育資產負債表分析。
Our Take On Overseas Education's Profit Performance
我們對海外教育盈利表現的看法
Overseas Education's accrual ratio is solid, and indicates strong free cash flow, as we discussed, above. Because of this, we think Overseas Education's earnings potential is at least as good as it seems, and maybe even better! And on top of that, its earnings per share increased by 27% in the last year. At the end of the day, it's essential to consider more than just the factors above, if you want to understand the company properly. If you want to do dive deeper into Overseas Education, you'd also look into what risks it is currently facing. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Overseas Education you should be mindful of and 1 of them is concerning.
正如我們在上面討論的那樣,海外教育的應計率穩健,表明自由現金流強勁。正因爲如此,我們認爲海外教育的盈利潛力至少和看起來一樣好,甚至可能更好!最重要的是,其每股收益在去年增長了27%。歸根結底,如果你想正確地了解公司,必須考慮的不僅僅是上述因素。如果你想更深入地研究海外教育,你還需要研究它目前面臨的風險。一個很好的例子:我們發現了你應該注意的3個海外教育警告信號,其中一個令人擔憂。
Today we've zoomed in on a single data point to better understand the nature of Overseas Education's profit. But there are plenty of other ways to inform your opinion of a company. For example, many people consider a high return on equity as an indication of favorable business economics, while others like to 'follow the money' and search out stocks that insiders are buying. While it might take a little research on your behalf, you may find this free collection of companies boasting high return on equity, or this list of stocks that insiders are buying to be useful.
今天,我們放大了單一數據點,以更好地了解海外教育利潤的性質。但是,還有很多其他方法可以讓你對公司的看法。例如,許多人認爲高股本回報率是有利的商業經濟的標誌,而另一些人則喜歡 “關注資金”,尋找內部人士正在買入的股票。雖然可能需要你進行一些研究,但你可能會發現這份免費收集的擁有高股本回報率的公司,或者這份內部人士正在購買的股票清單很有用。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。