share_log

After the Recent Decline, Lafang China Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603630) CEO Gui Qian Wu's Holdings Have Lost 16% of Their Value

After the Recent Decline, Lafang China Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603630) CEO Gui Qian Wu's Holdings Have Lost 16% of Their Value

在最近的下跌之後,拉芳中國有限公司, Ltd(上海證券交易所代碼:603630)首席執行官吳桂謙的持股已損失了16%的價值
Simply Wall St ·  04/16 21:54

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Lafang ChinaLtd's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • 59% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
  • Lafang ChinaLTD擁有大量內部所有權,這表明公司擴張具有內在利益
  • 59% 的業務由前兩位股東持有
  • 使用公司過去業績的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現

A look at the shareholders of Lafang China Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603630) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 59% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看拉芳中國股份有限公司的股東, Ltd(上海證券交易所代碼:603630)可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有59%所有權的個人內部人士。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by CN¥459m.

結果,在市值下降4.59億元人民幣之後,內部人士整體遭受了最大的損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lafang ChinaLtd, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究拉芳中國有限公司的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:603630 Ownership Breakdown April 17th 2024
SHSE: 603630 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lafang ChinaLtd?

關於拉芳中國有限公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

Less than 5% of Lafang ChinaLtd is held by institutional investors. This suggests that some funds have the company in their sights, but many have not yet bought shares in it. If the company is growing earnings, that may indicate that it is just beginning to catch the attention of these deep-pocketed investors. We sometimes see a rising share price when a few big institutions want to buy a certain stock at the same time. The history of earnings and revenue, which you can see below, could be helpful in considering if more institutional investors will want the stock. Of course, there are plenty of other factors to consider, too.

拉芳中國有限責任公司只有不到5%的股份由機構投資者持有。這表明一些基金將目光投向了該公司,但許多基金尚未購買該公司的股票。如果該公司正在增加收益,那可能表明它才剛剛開始引起這些財力雄厚的投資者的注意。當一些大型機構想同時購買某隻股票時,我們有時會看到股價上漲。你可以在下面看到的收益和收入的歷史可能有助於考慮是否會有更多的機構投資者想要這隻股票。當然,還有很多其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:603630 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 17th 2024
SHSE: 603630 2024 年 4 月 17 日收益和收入增長

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Lafang ChinaLtd. The company's CEO Gui Qian Wu is the largest shareholder with 40% of shares outstanding. Laurena Wu is the second largest shareholder owning 19% of common stock, and Shenzhen Shenghao Kaiyuan Investment Enterprise (Limited Partnership) holds about 1.3% of the company stock.

對沖基金在拉芳中國有限公司的股份不多。該公司首席執行官吳桂謙是最大股東,持有40%的已發行股份。Laurena Wu是第二大股東,擁有19%的普通股,深圳盛豪開元投資企業(有限合夥)持有公司約1.3%的股份。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

在進一步挖掘之後,我們發現前兩位股東共同控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着他們擁有影響公司決策的巨大權力。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。我們目前沒有收到分析師對該股的任何報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。

Insider Ownership Of Lafang ChinaLtd

拉芳中國有限公司的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間確實有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Lafang China Co.,Ltd. This gives them effective control of the company. Given it has a market cap of CN¥2.6b, that means they have CN¥1.5b worth of shares. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

我們的信息表明,內部人士擁有拉芳中國有限公司一半以上的股份。, Ltd. 這使他們能夠有效控制公司。鑑於其市值爲26億元人民幣,這意味着他們擁有價值15億元人民幣的股票。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望(免費)了解他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司38%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lafang ChinaLtd better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Lafang ChinaLtd (1 is concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,要更好地了解Lafang ChinaLTD,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了 Lafang ChinaLTD 的 2 個警告信號(1 個令人擔憂!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

當然,這可能不是最值得買入的股票。因此,您可能希望看到我們免費收集的具有良好財務狀況的有趣潛在客戶。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論