share_log

Rumere Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:301088) Stock Price Dropped 19% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

Rumere Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:301088) Stock Price Dropped 19% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

Rumere Co., Ltd. 's (SZSE: 301088) 上週股價下跌了19%;私營公司不會感到高興
Simply Wall St ·  04/17 00:39

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over RumereLtd by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • The largest shareholder of the company is Suzhou Rumere Group Co., Ltd. with a 52% stake
  • 23% of RumereLtd is held by insiders
  • 私營公司對Rumereltd的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 該公司的最大股東是蘇州魯米爾集團有限公司,持有52%的股份
  • Rumereltd 23% 的股份由內部人士持有

A look at the shareholders of Rumere Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:301088) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 52% to be precise, is private companies. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看看 Rumere Co. 的股東, Ltd.(深圳證券交易所代碼:301088)可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有該公司股份最多的集團是私營公司,準確地說約爲52%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。

While insiders, who own 23% shares weren't spared from last week's CN¥527m market cap drop, private companies as a group suffered the maximum losses

儘管擁有23%股票的內部人士未能倖免於上週5.27億元人民幣的市值下跌,但私營公司作爲一個整體遭受的損失最大

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of RumereLtd, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究RumerEltd的每種所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:301088 Ownership Breakdown April 17th 2024
SZSE: 301088 所有權明細 2024 年 4 月 17 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RumereLtd?

關於RumerEltd,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購相關基準指數中包含的大型公司。

We can see that RumereLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see RumereLtd's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,Rumereltd確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 “擁擠交易” 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Rumereltd的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:301088 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 17th 2024
SZSE: 301088 2024年4月17日收益和收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in RumereLtd. The company's largest shareholder is Suzhou Rumere Group Co., Ltd., with ownership of 52%. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. Jian Guo is the second largest shareholder owning 22% of common stock, and Qingtao Yu holds about 1.2% of the company stock. Qingtao Yu, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Rumereltd進行有意義的投資。公司的最大股東是蘇州魯米爾集團有限公司,擁有52%的股權。由於所有權持有如此巨額的股份,我們推斷他們對公司的未來擁有重大控制權。郭建是第二大股東,擁有22%的普通股,餘清濤持有公司約1.2%的股份。第三大股東餘慶濤也恰好擁有董事會成員的頭銜。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。儘管有一些分析師的報道,但該公司的報道可能並不廣泛。因此,在未來它可能會引起更多關注。

Insider Ownership Of RumereLtd

RumerelTD 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高度的內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部的一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Rumere Co.,Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥598m worth of shares in the CN¥2.6b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

內部人士似乎擁有魯米爾公司的很大一部分股份。,有限公司。內部人士擁有這家26億元人民幣公司價值5.98億元人民幣的股份。這可能表明創始人仍然擁有大量股份。你可以點擊這裏查看他們是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 20% stake in RumereLtd. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Rumereltd20%的股份。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 52%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的52%。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for RumereLtd (1 is potentially serious!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了 RumerEltd 的 2 個警告信號(1 個可能很嚴重!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這一點。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論