share_log

Hangzhou AGS MedTech Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688581) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Cheng Zhang, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 13% Last Week

Hangzhou AGS MedTech Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:688581) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Cheng Zhang, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 13% Last Week

杭州艾格斯医疗科技有限公司's(SHSE: 688581)最看涨的内部人士是首席执行官张成,他们的持股价值上周上涨了13%
Simply Wall St ·  04/24 00:55

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significant insider control over HangzhouS MedTech implies vested interests in company growth
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 55% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in HangzhouS MedTech is 24%
  • 对杭州医疗科技的重大内部控制意味着公司增长的既得利益
  • 共有2位投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为55%
  • 杭州医疗科技的机构所有权为24%

Every investor in Hangzhou AGS MedTech Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688581) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 40% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

杭州艾格斯医疗科技股份有限公司(上海证券交易所代码:688581)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。个人内部人士拥有40%的股份,是公司的最大股份。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 13% gain.

结果,内部人士是上周13%涨幅的最大受益者。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of HangzhouS MedTech, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究杭州医疗科技的每种类型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688581 Ownership Breakdown April 24th 2024
SHSE: 688581 所有权明细 2024 年 4 月 24 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About HangzhouS MedTech?

关于杭州医疗科技,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in HangzhouS MedTech. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of HangzhouS MedTech, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如您所见,机构投资者持有杭州医疗科技的大量股份。这可能表明该公司在投资界具有一定程度的信誉。但是,最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所谓的验证。他们有时也会弄错。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看杭州医疗科技过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688581 Earnings and Revenue Growth April 24th 2024
SHSE: 688581 收益和收入增长 2024 年 4 月 24 日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in HangzhouS MedTech. The company's CEO Cheng Zhang is the largest shareholder with 40% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 15% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.7% by the third-largest shareholder.

我们注意到,对冲基金没有对杭州医疗科技进行有意义的投资。该公司首席执行官张成是最大股东,持有40%的已发行股份。就背景而言,第二大股东持有约15%的已发行股份,其次是第三大股东持有5.7%的所有权。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 55% stake.

对股东登记处的更详细的研究表明,有两位大股东通过其55%的股份拥有公司的大量所有权。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。尽管有一些分析师的报道,但该公司的报道可能并不广泛。因此,在未来它可能会引起更多关注。

Insider Ownership Of HangzhouS MedTech

杭州医疗科技的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部所有权表明领导层像公司的真正所有者一样思考时,内部所有权是积极的。但是,高度的内部所有权也可以赋予公司内部的一小部分人巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Hangzhou AGS MedTech Co., Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥1.7b worth of shares in the CN¥4.2b company. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,内部人士持有杭州AGS医疗科技有限公司的大量股份。内部人士拥有这家42亿元人民币公司价值17亿元人民币的股份。这可能表明创始人仍然拥有大量股份。你可以点击这里查看他们是否在买入或卖出。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in HangzhouS MedTech. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有杭州医疗科技13%的股份。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 9.0%, of the HangzhouS MedTech stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

私人公司似乎拥有杭州医疗科技9.0%的股份。私营公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过控股私营公司而对上市公司拥有权益,而不是以个人身份拥有权益。尽管很难得出任何宽泛的结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个需要进一步研究的领域。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

Public companies currently own 15% of HangzhouS MedTech stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

上市公司目前拥有杭州医疗科技15%的股份。我们无法确定,但这很可能是一个战略利益。这些企业可能是相似的,也可以是合作的。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand HangzhouS MedTech better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with HangzhouS MedTech , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

拥有公司股份的不同群体总是值得考虑的。但是,要更好地了解杭州的医疗科技,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如,投资风险的幽灵无处不在。我们已经确定了杭州医疗科技的1个警告信号,我们知道它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发