The Recent 14% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Zhong Zhou's Week, Acrel Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:300286) Most Bullish Insider
The Recent 14% Gain Must Have Brightened CEO Zhong Zhou's Week, Acrel Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:300286) Most Bullish Insider
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significant insider control over AcrelLtd implies vested interests in company growth
- The top 5 shareholders own 53% of the company
- Institutions own 20% of AcrelLtd
- 對AcrelLtd的重大內部控制意味着公司增長中的既得利益
- 前五名股東擁有公司53%的股份
- 機構擁有 AcrelLtd 20% 的股份
A look at the shareholders of Acrel Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:300286) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 40% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
來看看 Acrel Co. 的股東, Ltd.(深圳證券交易所代碼:300286)可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。個人內部人士擁有40%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。
As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 14% gain.
結果,內部人士是上週14%漲幅的最大受益者。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of AcrelLtd.
在下圖中,我們放大了AcrelLtd的不同所有權組。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AcrelLtd?
關於AcrelLtd,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。
We can see that AcrelLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of AcrelLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到,AcrelLtd確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下AcrelLtd過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
AcrelLtd is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Zhong Zhou with 19% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 16% and 7.5% of the stock.
AcrelLtd不歸對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大的股東是首席執行官周忠,其已發行股份的19%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約16%和7.5%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前五名股東控制着公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種好做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of AcrelLtd
AcrelLtd 的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行委員會成員的情況並不少見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Acrel Co.,Ltd.. Insiders have a CN¥1.7b stake in this CN¥4.3b business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Acrel Co合理比例的股份。,有限公司。業內人士持有這筆43億元人民幣的業務17億加元的股份。很高興看到內部人士對這項業務進行如此投資。可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 22% stake in AcrelLtd. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有AcrelLtd22%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 16%, of the AcrelLtd stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
看來私營公司擁有AcrelLtd股票的16%。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with AcrelLtd , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向AcrelLtd確定了1個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。