share_log

Retail Investors Are Lotus Health Group Company's (SHSE:600186) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥479m Last Week

Retail Investors Are Lotus Health Group Company's (SHSE:600186) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥479m Last Week

散户投资者是莲花健康集团公司(SHSE: 600186)的最大所有者,在上周市值上涨4.79亿元人民币后获得了回报
Simply Wall St ·  04/30 20:42

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Lotus Health Group's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 48% ownership
  • Institutions own 10% of Lotus Health Group
  • 莲花健康集团拥有大量散户投资者的所有权,这表明关键决策受到广大公众股东的影响
  • 共有17名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为48%
  • 机构拥有莲花健康集团10%的股份

A look at the shareholders of Lotus Health Group Company (SHSE:600186) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 52% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看看莲花健康集团公司(SHSE: 600186)的股东可以告诉我们哪个集团最强大。我们可以看到,散户投资者拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为52%。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

As a result, retail investors collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥7.8b market cap following a 6.5% gain in the stock.

结果,散户投资者上周集体得分最高,该公司的市值在股价上涨6.5%后达到78亿元人民币。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lotus Health Group.

在下图中,我们放大了莲花健康集团的不同所有权组。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600186 Ownership Breakdown May 1st 2024
SHSE: 600186 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 1 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lotus Health Group?

关于莲花健康集团,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

Lotus Health Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lotus Health Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

莲花健康集团已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果两个大型机构投资者试图同时抛售股票,股价大幅下跌的情况并不少见。因此,值得查看莲花健康集团过去的收益轨迹(见下文)。当然,请记住,还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600186 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 1st 2024
SHSE: 600186 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 1 日

Lotus Health Group is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Zhoukou Chengtou Development Group Co., Ltd., with ownership of 13%. With 10% and 5.0% of the shares outstanding respectively, Wuhu Liantai Investment Management Center (Limited Partnership) and Congyang Lianxing Business Service Management Center Partnership Enterprise (Limtied Partnership) are the second and third largest shareholders.

莲花健康集团不归对冲基金所有。公司的最大股东是周口城投发展集团有限公司,持股13%。芜湖联泰投资管理中心(有限合伙)和丛阳联兴商业服务管理中心合伙企业(有限合伙)分别占已发行股份的10%和5.0%,是第二和第三大股东。

Our studies suggest that the top 17 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

我们的研究表明,前17名股东共同控制的公司股份不到一半,这意味着该公司的股票被广泛传播,没有占主导地位的股东。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。据我们所知,没有分析师对该公司进行报道,因此它可能处于雷达之下。

Insider Ownership Of Lotus Health Group

莲花健康集团的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间确实有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人士,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. Given we are not picking up on insider ownership, we may have missing data. Therefore, it would be interesting to assess the CEO compensation and tenure, here.

我们注意到,我们的数据并未显示任何董事会成员个人持有股份。鉴于我们没有获得内部所有权,我们可能缺少数据。因此,在这里评估首席执行官的薪酬和任期会很有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 52% stake in Lotus Health Group, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

公众通常是个人投资者,持有莲花健康集团52%的大量股份,这表明该股相当受欢迎。这种所有权规模赋予了公众投资者一定的集体权力。他们可以而且可能确实会影响有关高管薪酬、股息政策和拟议业务收购的决策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有权

It seems that Private Companies own 38%, of the Lotus Health Group stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

私人公司似乎拥有莲花健康集团38%的股票。私营公司可能是关联方。有时,内部人士通过控股私营公司而对上市公司拥有权益,而不是以个人身份拥有权益。尽管很难得出任何宽泛的结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个需要进一步研究的领域。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我觉得看看究竟是谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们也需要考虑其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜欢更深入地了解一家公司过去的表现。您可以在这张详细图表中找到历史收入和收入。

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.

当然,这可能不是最值得买入的股票。因此,来看看这份免费的有趣公司名单吧。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发