share_log

The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed AAC Technologies Holdings Inc. (HKG:2018) Insiders Who Own 42% of the Company

The Recent Pullback Must Have Dismayed AAC Technologies Holdings Inc. (HKG:2018) Insiders Who Own 42% of the Company

最近的回調一定讓擁有該公司42%股份的瑞聲科技控股有限公司(HKG: 2018)內部人士感到沮喪
Simply Wall St ·  05/21 01:40

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • AAC Technologies Holdings' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Institutional ownership in AAC Technologies Holdings is 27%
  • 瑞聲科技控股公司擁有大量內部所有權,表明公司擴張有固有的利益
  • 共有3位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 瑞聲科技控股的機構所有權爲27%

If you want to know who really controls AAC Technologies Holdings Inc. (HKG:2018), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 42% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果你想知道誰真正控制了瑞聲科技控股有限公司(HKG: 2018),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,個別內部人士擁有公司的大部分股份,所有權爲42%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。

And following last week's 13% decline in share price, insiders suffered the most losses.

繼上週股價下跌13%之後,內部人士遭受的損失最大。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of AAC Technologies Holdings, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究瑞聲科技控股公司的每種類型的所有者。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2018 Ownership Breakdown May 21st 2024
香港交易所:2018 所有權明細 2024 年 5 月 21 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About AAC Technologies Holdings?

關於瑞聲科技控股公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in AAC Technologies Holdings. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of AAC Technologies Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所見,機構投資者持有瑞聲科技控股公司的大量股份。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看瑞聲科技控股公司過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2018 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 21st 2024
香港交易所:2018 年收益及收入增長 2024 年 5 月 21 日

AAC Technologies Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. Chun Yuan Wu is currently the largest shareholder, with 22% of shares outstanding. With 20% and 9.3% of the shares outstanding respectively, Zhengmin Pan and JPMorgan Chase & Co, Private Banking and Investment Banking Investments are the second and third largest shareholders. Zhengmin Pan, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

瑞聲科技控股公司不歸對沖基金所有。吳春元目前是最大股東,已發行股份的22%。潘正民和摩根大通、私人銀行和投資銀行投資分別擁有20%和9.3%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。第二大股東潘正敏也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 51% stake.

對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,前三名股東通過其51%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的目的。有很多分析師在報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of AAC Technologies Holdings

瑞聲科技控股公司的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of AAC Technologies Holdings Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful HK$12b stake in this HK$29b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

內部人士似乎擁有瑞聲科技控股公司的很大一部分股份。有趣的是,內部人士在這項290億港元的業務中擁有120億港元的大量股份。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

With a 31% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over AAC Technologies Holdings. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

瑞聲科技控股擁有31%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對瑞聲科技控股有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand AAC Technologies Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with AAC Technologies Holdings , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解瑞聲科技控股公司,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向瑞聲科技控股公司發現了一個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂?直接聯繫我們。 或者,給編輯團隊 (at) simplywallst.com 發送電子郵件。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法根據歷史數據和分析師的預測提供評論,我們的文章無意作爲財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。簡而言之,華爾街沒有持有任何上述股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論