share_log

Private Companies Who Hold 44% of Powerwin Tech Group Limited (HKG:2405) Gained 25%, Insiders Profited as Well

Private Companies Who Hold 44% of Powerwin Tech Group Limited (HKG:2405) Gained 25%, Insiders Profited as Well

持有Powerwin Tech Group Limited(HKG: 2405)44%股份的私人公司上涨了25%,内部人士也获利
Simply Wall St ·  05/22 18:38

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Powerwin Tech Group's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 2 investors have a majority stake in the company with 74% ownership
  • Insider ownership in Powerwin Tech Group is 31%
  • Powerwin Tech Group的私人公司所有权表明,关键决策受到更大公众的股东影响。
  • 共有2家投资者拥有74%的股权,控制该公司大多数股份。
  • Powerwin Tech Group的内部所有权为31%。

If you want to know who really controls Powerwin Tech Group Limited (HKG:2405), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 44% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制Powerwin Tech Group Limited (HKG:2405),那么你必须看其股份登记簿的构成。私人公司拥有44%的股份,是该公司持股最多的团体,也就是说,该团体将从其对公司的投资中获得最大的收益(或亏损最多)。

While private companies were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 25% price gain, insiders also received a 31% cut.

尽管上周25%的价格增长后,私人公司是获得了最大收益的团体,但内部人员也分到了31%的股份。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Powerwin Tech Group.

在下图中,我们放大了Powerwin Tech Group的不同所有权团体。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2405 Ownership Breakdown May 22nd 2024
SEHK:2405所有权结构2024年5月22日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Powerwin Tech Group?

Powerwin Tech Group缺少机构股东,这告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

机构不拥有股票的原因有多种解释。最常见的是公司相对于管理基金过小,因此机构不必仔细审查公司。也有可能是基金经理人不持有股票,因为他们不确信该股票表现良好。机构投资者可能并不认为该业务的历史增长令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己看到Zibuyu Group的过去营业收入表现。

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Powerwin Tech Group's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.

公司没有机构股东的原因有很多,比如流动性(每天交易的股票数量)不足,机构在买入大量股票时可能很难,或者公司没有募资的需求。另一方面,职业投资者可能会避开某个公司,因为他们认为这不是最好的投资场所。Powerwin Tech Group的收入和营收纪录(如下图)可能对机构投资者缺乏吸引力----或者他们根本没有仔细研究该公司的业务。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2405 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 22nd 2024
SEHK:2405收益和营收增长2024年5月22日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Powerwin Tech Group. Common Excellence International Group Limited is currently the company's largest shareholder with 44% of shares outstanding. With 30% and 0.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, Xiang Rong Li and Lu Yu are the second and third largest shareholders. Lu Yu, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

对Powerwin Tech Group而言,对冲基金持股不多。目前,Common Excellence International Group Limited是该公司最大的股东,持有44%的已发行股票。Xiang Rong Li和Lu Yu分别持有30%和0.7%的已发行股票,是第二和第三大股东。而Lu Yu是第三大股东,同时也是董事会成员。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

经过进一步挖掘,我们发现前两个股东共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,说明他们有相当大的影响力来影响公司的决策。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权数据是有意义的,但考虑到分析师的看法,了解风向也是有意义的。我们的信息表明,该股票没有任何分析师的覆盖,因此它可能鲜为人知。

Insider Ownership Of Powerwin Tech Group

Powerwin Tech Group的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Powerwin Tech Group Limited. It has a market capitalization of just HK$3.1b, and insiders have HK$962m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们最近的数据表明,内部人员拥有Powerwin Tech Group Limited的相当比例。该公司的市值仅为31亿港币,而内部人员自己持有9.62亿港元的股份,看到内部人员对公司产生了投资的热情是很好的。要注意的是,值得进一步研究的是,有时内部人员通过对某个私人公司的持股而不是以个人身份利益涉及公开公司。如果这些内部人员最近一直在买入,就值得检查一下。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 25% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公众(包括零售投资者)拥有该公司25%的股份,并因此不能轻视他们。虽然这种持股规模可能不足以扭转政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 44%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我们可以看到,私人公司占已发行股份的44%。私人公司可能是相关方。有时内部人员通过在私人公司中持有股份而涉及公共公司,并不代表他们以个人身份进行投资。虽然难以得出任何普遍结论,但值得注意的是,这是一个可以进行进一步研究的领域。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Powerwin Tech Group you should know about.

虽然考虑到不同的股东团体对公司的所有权非常值得,但还有其他更重要的因素需要考虑。例如,考虑风险。每个公司都有风险,我们已经发现Powerwin Tech Group存在两个警戒信号。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果您更愿意查看另一家具有潜在更强财务状况的公司,请不要错过这份由强大财务数据支撑的有趣公司的免费列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发