Institutional Investors in Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF) Must Be Dismayed After Prices Dropped by 9.6% Last Week
Institutional Investors in Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF) Must Be Dismayed After Prices Dropped by 9.6% Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Knife River implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 19 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Recent purchases by insiders
- 机构对Knife River的大量持股意味着他们对公司的股价有重要的影响。
- 共有19个投资者拥有该公司50%的所有权。
- 最近有内部人员购买。
If you want to know who really controls Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 80% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道谁真正控制了Knife River Corporation (NYSE:KNF),那么你将不得不查看其股权登记资料。而拥有最大份额的是拥有80%所有权的机构。这意味着,如果该股票上涨,该集团将获得最多的收益(或者如果股市下跌,将承担最大的损失)。
And following last week's 9.6% decline in share price, institutional suffered the most losses.
在上周9.6%的股价下跌后,机构遭受了最大的损失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Knife River.
让我们更仔细地看看股东的不同类型可以告诉我们关于Knife River的什么信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Knife River?
机构持有Knife River的股份,这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资决策,就像其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,大股价下跌并不罕见。因此,值得检查Knife River的过去收益轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住其他要考虑的因素。
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Knife River. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Knife River, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如图所示,机构投资者在Knife River中持有相当数量的股份。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的可信度。但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会做出糟糕的投资决策,就像其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图抛售股票,大股价下跌并不罕见。 因此,值得检查Knife River的过去收益轨迹(如下)。当然,也要记住其他要考虑的因素。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Knife River. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 3.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
机构投资者拥有公司的50%以上股份,因此他们可能会强烈影响董事会的决策。我们注意到对Knife River来说,对冲基金并没有意义。目前,BlackRock,Inc.是这家公司的最大股东,持有12%的流通股。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有流通股的10%和3.5%。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 19 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.
经过进一步的挖掘,我们发现前19名股东在公司中拥有50%的股份,这表明没有单一股东对公司具有重大控制力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。
Insider Ownership Of Knife River
Knife River公司内部的持股情况
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
虽然内部人员的具体定义可能是主观的,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人员。公司管理层应向董事会回答问题,后者应代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高层管理人员也会成为董事会成员。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
Our information suggests that Knife River Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a pretty big company, so it would be possible for board members to own a meaningful interest in the company, without owning much of a proportional interest. In this case, they own around US$25m worth of shares (at current prices). It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我们的信息表明,Knife River Corporation内部人员拥有不到1%的公司股份。这是一家相当大的公司,因此董事会成员可以拥有该公司相当大的利益,而不拥有太多的比例利益。在这种情况下,他们拥有价值约2500万美元的股票(按当前价格计算)。拥有至少一些内部人员的股份是好事,但检查一下这些内部人员是否一直在抛售有意义。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Knife River. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
拥有19%所有权的普通公众,大多是个人投资者,对Knife River有一定的影响力。尽管该群体不能决定如何运营公司,但他们确实可以对公司运营产生真正的影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Knife River better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Knife River has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
考虑到公司的股东有不同的群体,这是值得思考的事情。但要更好地了解Knife River,我们还需要考虑其他很多因素。例如,承担风险——Knife River有一个我们认为你应该注意的1个警示信号。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想发现分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份有关分析师预测的免费报告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或电邮 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。