share_log

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Allogene Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ALLO) Latest 12% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

Institutional Investors May Adopt Severe Steps After Allogene Therapeutics, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ALLO) Latest 12% Drop Adds to a Year Losses

繼Allogene Therapeutics, Inc.之後,機構投資者可能會採取嚴厲措施s(納斯達克股票代碼:ALLO)最近12%的跌幅增加了年度虧損
Simply Wall St ·  05/23 13:46

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Allogene Therapeutics' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構持股數量高意味着Allogene Therapeutics的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 該公司共有8個股東擁有51%的股權。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

A look at the shareholders of Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ:ALLO) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 55% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

觀察Allogene Therapeutics, Inc. (納斯達克股票代碼: ALLO) 的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體是最強大的。佔股55%的機構是擁有最大股份的群體。換句話說,該群體最有可能(或最不可能)從他們對該公司的投資中獲得最多的收益或承受最多的損失。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$73m. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 51% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Allogene Therapeutics, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

因此,在市值下跌7,300萬美元后,機構投資者遭受了最高的損失。最近的虧損加上股東持股一年的51%的虧損,可能不會對這群投資者心情好。機構或“流動性提供者”控制着大量資金,因此這類投資者通常對股票價格的波動有很大的影響力。因此,如果下降趨勢持續,機構可能面臨出售Allogene Therapeutics的壓力,這可能會對個人投資者產生負面影響。在下面的圖表中,我們放大了Allogene Therapeutics各個所有權群體的不同。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Allogene Therapeutics.

下面的圖表中,我們放大了Allogene Therapeutics的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:ALLO Ownership Breakdown May 23rd 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:ALLO所有權的拆分情況2024年5月23日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Allogene Therapeutics?

機構持股量告訴我們關於Allogene Therapeutics的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Allogene Therapeutics already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Allogene Therapeutics' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

Allogene Therapeutics已經擁有機構投資者的持股登記簿。實際上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這可以表明公司在投資界具有一定的信譽度。然而,最好謹慎地依靠機構投資者所認爲的合理性。他們也會犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變對股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下Allogene Therapeutics的收益歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:ALLO Earnings and Revenue Growth May 23rd 2024
納斯達克股票代碼:ALLO2024年5月23日的收入和營收增長

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Allogene Therapeutics. FMR LLC is currently the largest shareholder, with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 9.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Furthermore, CEO David Chang is the owner of 3.7% of the company's shares.

機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可以共同強烈影響董事會的決策。我們注意到對Allogene Therapeutics沒有很大的投資。FMR有限責任公司目前是最大的股東,持有公司12%的股份。同時,第二大股東和第三大股東分別持有公司流通股的11%和9.0%。此外,CEO David Chang是該公司股份的擁有者,持有公司3.7%的股份

We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

內部人員擁有佛山藍火箭電子股份有限公司的重要比例。內部人員在這家69億元人民幣的企業中持有25億元人民幣的股份,看到內部人員如此投資是很好的。如果這些內部人員最近一直在購買,那就值得檢查。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Allogene Therapeutics

Allogene Therapeutics的內部持股情況

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Allogene Therapeutics, Inc.. In their own names, insiders own US$32m worth of stock in the US$555m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以看到內部人員擁有Allogene Therapeutics的股份。內部人員以自己的名義擁有價值3200萬美元的股票,佔這家價值55.5億美元公司的百分之多少比。看到內部人員的投資是好事,但值得檢查的是這些內部人員是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

我覺得研究誰真正擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。爲此,您應該意識到Lazard存在3個警告信號。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 9.0% stake in Allogene Therapeutics. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有Allogene Therapeutics的9.0%的股份。這表明他們可以在重要政策決策上具有影響力。有些人可能喜歡這樣的情況,因爲私募股權公司有時是激進分子,他們追究管理層的責任。但有時,私募股權公司會出脫股份,把公司推向公共市場。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 11% of Allogene Therapeutics. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

據我們了解,公共公司擁有Allogene Therapeutics的11%的股份。很難說股份的確切用途,但這表明他們已經獲得了共同的商業利益。這可能是一項戰略投資,因此值得關注這個領域股權的變化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Allogene Therapeutics better, we need to consider many other factors. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Allogene Therapeutics (of which 1 is a bit concerning!) you should know about.

思考股東的不同群體總是有益的。但要更好地了解Allogene Therapeutics,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如風險。每個公司都有風險,我們已經發現Allogene Therapeutics的 3個預警信號 (其中1個有點令人擔憂!)你應該知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論