share_log

Private Companies Are Cybrid Technologies Inc.'s (SHSE:603212) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥494m Last Week

Private Companies Are Cybrid Technologies Inc.'s (SHSE:603212) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by CN¥494m Last Week

私營公司是 Cybrid Technologies Inc. 's(SHSE: 603212)最大的所有者在上週市值上漲4.94億元人民幣後獲得了回報
Simply Wall St ·  05/24 18:10

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Cybrid Technologies' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 52% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders
  • Institutional ownership in Cybrid Technologies is 11%
  • 賽布瑞德科技重要的私營公司所有權表明,關鍵決策受到更大公衆股東的影響
  • 前五大股東持有該公司52%的股份。
  • 賽布瑞德科技的機構持股比例爲11%

A look at the shareholders of Cybrid Technologies Inc. (SHSE:603212) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 47% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

查看賽布瑞德科技股份有限公司(SHSE:603212)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最具影響力。私營公司擁有47%的股份,在公司中持有最大份額。換句話說,該群體面對着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。

As a result, private companies collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥5.9b market cap following a 9.1% gain in the stock.

結果,私人公司上週表現最好,該公司股票上漲了9.1%,市值達到59億元人民幣。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Cybrid Technologies, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究Cybrid Technologies的每種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:603212 Ownership Breakdown May 24th 2024
SHSE:603212目前股權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cybrid Technologies?

機構投資者對Cybrid Technologies的持股比例告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Cybrid Technologies does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Cybrid Technologies' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到Cybrid Technologies確實有機構投資者,並且他們持有該公司的大部分股票。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會犯錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,查看Cybrid Technologies的盈利歷史很值得。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:603212 Earnings and Revenue Growth May 24th 2024
SHSE:603212營收和收入增長2024年5月24日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Cybrid Technologies. Suzhou Hi-Tech Zone Fanyang Technology Development Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 27% of shares outstanding. With 8.5% and 7.2% of the shares outstanding respectively, Silver Glow Investments Limited and Wujiang Dongyun Venture Capital Co., Ltd. are the second and third largest shareholders.

我們注意到對沖基金在Cybrid Technologies中沒有意義重大的投資。蘇州高新區繁陽科技發展有限公司目前是該公司最大的股東,持有27%的流通股。銀光投資有限公司和吳江東雲創投有限公司分別持有8.5%和7.2%的流通股,是第二和第三大股東。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前5位股東控制了該公司超過一半的股份,這意味着該組人對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。研究分析師的看法也可以達到同樣的效果。股票的分析師覆蓋率很低,但不多。因此,可以有更多的空間來增加其覆蓋範圍。

Insider Ownership Of Cybrid Technologies

Cybrid Technologies內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Cybrid Technologies Inc. in their own names. We do note, however, it is possible insiders have an indirect interest through a private company or other corporate structure. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥5.9b, and the board has only CN¥223k worth of shares in their own names. Many tend to prefer to see a board with bigger shareholdings. A good next step might be to take a look at this free summary of insider buying and selling.

我們的數據顯示,內部人士以自己的名義持有Cybrid Technologies Inc.不到1%的股份。 不過,我們注意到,內部人士可能通過私人公司或其他公司結構間接持有利益。 它的市值僅爲59億人民幣,董事會成員以自己的名義只持有22.3萬人民幣的股份。 許多人傾向於看到董事會持有更多股份。 下一步可以看看內部買賣股票的免費摘要。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 34% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cybrid Technologies. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

佔有34%的一般公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對Cybrid Technologies有一定的影響力。 雖然這個群體不能決定事情,但它確實能對公司的經營產生真正的影響。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

With a stake of 7.2%, private equity firms could influence the Cybrid Technologies board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

擁有7.2%股份的股權投資公司可能會影響Cybrid Technologies的董事會。 一些投資者可能會因此感到鼓舞,因爲股權投資有時能夠鼓勵幫助市場看到公司價值的戰略。或者,這些股東可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 47%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據顯示私人公司持有該公司的47%股份。僅從這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司的股份。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私人公司擁有公共公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

Many find it useful to take an in depth look at how a company has performed in the past. You can access this detailed graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow.

很多人覺得深入了解一家公司過去的表現是有用的。您可以訪問此詳細的過去收益、營業收入和現金流量圖。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論