share_log

Institutional Investors in Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (NYSE:WD) See US$242m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

Institutional Investors in Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (NYSE:WD) See US$242m Decrease in Market Cap Last Week, Although Long-term Gains Have Benefitted Them.

沃克和鄧祿普公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:WD)的機構投資者上週的市值下降了2.42億美元,儘管長期收益使他們受益。
Simply Wall St ·  05/26 10:23

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Walker & Dunlop's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 8 shareholders
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 極高的機構持有意味着Walker&Dunlop的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
  • 前八大股東持有該業務的51%。
  • 最近由內部人士出售。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (NYSE:WD), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 84% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要想真正了解Walker&Dunlop, Inc. (NYSE:WD)誰在掌控,了解業務的所有權結構是十分重要的。持有公司84%所有權的機構是擁有最大份額的群體。換句話說,該群體將會從他們對該公司的投資中獲得最大的收益(或者最大的虧損)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$3.2b last week. However, the 34% one-year return to shareholders may have helped lessen their pain. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

該公司市值上週下跌至3.2億美元后,機構投資者是受到最大影響的群體。然而,34%的股東一年的回報或許有助於減輕他們的痛苦。然而,我們會假設他們將會密切關注未來的弱點。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Walker & Dunlop, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入挖掘一下Walker&Dunlop的每一種所有者,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:WD Ownership Breakdown May 26th 2024
NYSE:WD所有權分佈2024年5月26日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Walker & Dunlop?

機構持股告訴我們什麼關於Walker&Dunlop?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

We can see that Walker & Dunlop does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Walker & Dunlop's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到,Walker&Dunlop確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司的相當一部分股票。這表明專業投資者中有一些可信度。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變他們對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得看一下Walker&Dunlop下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:WD Earnings and Revenue Growth May 26th 2024
NYSE:WD收益和營收增長2024年5月26日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Walker & Dunlop is not owned by hedge funds. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 16% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 11% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.9% by the third-largest shareholder. Furthermore, CEO William Walker is the owner of 2.7% of the company's shares.

機構投資者佔據公司的50%以上,因此他們可能會共同影響公司董事會的決策。Walker&Dunlop不是由對沖基金持有的。目前,BlackRock, Inc.是該公司的最大股東,持有16%的流通股。作爲背景,第二大股東持有大約11%的流通股,其次是第三大股東持有5.9%的股份。此外,CEO William Walker擁有該公司2.7%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Walker & Dunlop

Walker&Dunlop的內部所有權

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

雖然“內部人士”的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Walker & Dunlop, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$170m. Most would see this as a real positive. If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到,內部人擁有Walker&Dunlop,Inc.的股份。內部人持有US$170m的實質性股份。大多數人會將此視爲真正的好事。如果您想探究內部人的利益相關性,可以點擊此處查看內部人是否在買賣。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

一般公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有該公司11%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽略。雖然這種所有權規模可能不足以在他們的利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Walker & Dunlop has 4 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

我覺得查看公司所有者非常有趣。但是要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如承擔風險——Walker&Dunlop有4個警告信號,我們認爲您應該了解。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論