share_log

Is MasterBrand (NYSE:MBC) Using Too Much Debt?

Is MasterBrand (NYSE:MBC) Using Too Much Debt?

MasterBrand(紐約證券交易所代碼:MBC)是否使用過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  05/29 08:00

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, MasterBrand, Inc. (NYSE:MBC) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

禾倫·巴菲特稱:“波動性與風險遠非同義詞”。因此當你考慮這隻股票有多大風險時,必須考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能會導致公司破產。重要的是,MasterBrand, Inc.(NYSE:MBC)確實存在債務。但更重要的問題是:這筆債務產生了多大的風險?

When Is Debt A Problem?

什麼時候負債才是一個問題?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.

債務可以幫助業務,直到業務遇到難以用新的資本或者自由現金流來還清債務的時候。如果公司無法滿足償還債務的法律義務,股東可能什麼也拿不到。但更常見(但仍然痛苦)的情況是以低價籌集新的股本資本,從而永久稀釋股東持有的股份。話雖這麼說,最常見的情況是公司合理控制其債務,並使之發揮作用。在考慮一個公司使用的債務量時,首先要做的是看看其現金和債務的結合。

How Much Debt Does MasterBrand Carry?

MasterBrand承擔了多少債務?

The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that MasterBrand had debt of US$708.0m at the end of March 2024, a reduction from US$939.6m over a year. On the flip side, it has US$153.7m in cash leading to net debt of about US$554.3m.

下面的圖片(點擊可放大)顯示,MasterBrand在2024年3月底的債務爲7.08億美元,比一年前的9.396億美元減少。另一方面,它有1.537億美元的現金,導致淨債務約爲5.543億美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:MBC Debt to Equity History May 29th 2024
NYSE:MBC 債務/股本歷史數據 2024年5月29日

A Look At MasterBrand's Liabilities

MasterBrand的負債情況

The latest balance sheet data shows that MasterBrand had liabilities of US$340.4m due within a year, and liabilities of US$830.7m falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$153.7m and US$224.4m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total US$793.0m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,MasterBrand的負債中有3.404億美元在一年內到期,830.7 million美元的負債在此後到期。另一方面,它在一年內有1.537億美元的現金和2.244億美元的應收賬款。因此,其負債比其現金和短期應收賬款的組合多了7.93億美元。

MasterBrand has a market capitalization of US$2.06b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But it's clear that we should definitely closely examine whether it can manage its debt without dilution.

MasterBrand 的市值爲20.6億美元,所以如果需要,它很可能籌集資金來改善其資產負債表。但是很明顯,我們應該仔細審查它是否能夠在不稀釋股東的情況下管理其債務。

In order to size up a company's debt relative to its earnings, we calculate its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) divided by its interest expense (its interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

爲了衡量公司債務相對於其收益的大小,我們計算其淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前收益(EBITDA)以及其稅前收益與利息支出(其利息覆蓋率)的比率。這樣,我們既考慮了債務的絕對量,也考慮了所支付的利率。

MasterBrand has net debt worth 1.5 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 4.9 times the interest expense. While these numbers do not alarm us, it's worth noting that the cost of the company's debt is having a real impact. We saw MasterBrand grow its EBIT by 2.4% in the last twelve months. Whilst that hardly knocks our socks off it is a positive when it comes to debt. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if MasterBrand can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

MasterBrand 的淨債務值爲EBITDA的1.5倍,不算太多,但是其利息覆蓋倍數看起來有點低,EBIT只有利息費用的4.9倍。雖然這些數字不會使我們驚慌,但值得注意的是,公司的債務成本正在產生實際影響。我們看到MasterBrand在過去12個月中將EBIT增長了2.4%。雖然這不能讓我們感到十分興奮,但在處理債務方面卻是一個好兆頭。在債務方面,我們最多從資產負債表中學到。但是,最終業務的未來利潤能力將決定MasterBrand是否能夠長期加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您專注於未來,請查看此免費報告,以了解分析師的利潤預測。

Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. During the last three years, MasterBrand produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 73% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最後,公司只能用真正的現金而不是會計利潤來償還債務。因此,我們需要清楚地看到EBIT是否導致相應的自由現金流。在過去三年中,MasterBrand產生了穩健的自由現金流,相當於其EBIT的73%,與我們的預期大致相當。這筆真正的現金意味着它可以在希望的時候減少債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

On our analysis MasterBrand's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow should signal that it won't have too much trouble with its debt. But the other factors we noted above weren't so encouraging. For instance it seems like it has to struggle a bit to handle its total liabilities. Considering this range of data points, we think MasterBrand is in a good position to manage its debt levels. But a word of caution: we think debt levels are high enough to justify ongoing monitoring. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for MasterBrand you should be aware of.

根據我們的分析,MasterBrand的EBIT轉化爲自由現金流應該表明其應對債務不會遇到太大的困難。但我們上面提到的其他因素並不令人鼓舞。例如,似乎它必須努力應對其總負債。綜合考慮這些數據點,我們認爲MasterBrand有能力管理其債務水平。但是需要注意的是:我們認爲債務水平已經高到需要持續監測的程度。同時,每個公司都可能存在超出資產負債表範圍的風險。例如我們已經發現了1個MasterBrand的警告信號,您應該知道。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

如果您在所有這些工作之後,更感興趣於擁有堅實資產負債表的快速發展公司,請立即查看我們的淨現金成長股列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論