share_log

With 86% Ownership, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

With 86% Ownership, Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD) Boasts of Strong Institutional Backing

吉利德科学公司(纳斯达克股票代码:GILD)拥有 86% 的所有权,拥有强大的机构支持
Simply Wall St ·  05/31 12:48

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Gilead Sciences' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 高机构所有权意味着吉利德科学的股价对其交易行为很敏感
  • 50% 的业务由前 15 名股东持有
  • 所有权研究以及分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票的机会

Every investor in Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 86% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

吉利德科学公司(纳斯达克股票代码:GILD)的每位投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。我们可以看到,机构拥有该公司的大部分股份,所有权为86%。换句话说,该集团面临最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者而言。因此,将大量机构资金投资于公司通常被视为理想的特征。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Gilead Sciences.

让我们仔细看看不同类型的股东能告诉我们有关吉利德科学的哪些信息。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:GILD Ownership Breakdown May 31st 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:GILD 所有权明细 2024 年 5 月 31 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Gilead Sciences?

关于吉利德科学,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见指数的回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑收购相关基准指数中包含的大型公司。

Gilead Sciences already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Gilead Sciences' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

吉利德科学已经在股份登记处设立了机构。事实上,他们拥有该公司可观的股份。这表明专业投资者有一定的信誉。但是我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会像所有人一样进行不良投资。如果多家机构同时改变对股票的看法,你可能会看到股价快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看吉利德科学的收益记录。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:GILD Earnings and Revenue Growth May 31st 2024
NASDAQGS: GILD 收益和收入增长 2024 年 5 月 31 日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Gilead Sciences is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Capital Research and Management Company with 12% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.8% and 9.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由于机构投资者拥有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能必须注意他们的偏好。吉利德科学不归对冲基金所有。从我们的数据来看,我们可以看到最大的股东是资本研究与管理公司,已发行股份的12%。同时,第二和第三大股东分别持有已发行股份的9.8%和9.2%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 15 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

经过进一步的挖掘,我们发现排名前15位的公司合并所有权为50%,这表明没有一个单一股东对公司拥有重要的控制权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和筛选股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以达到同样的目的。有相当数量的分析师在报道该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体看法可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Gilead Sciences

吉利德科学的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理成为执行委员会成员的情况并不少见,尤其是当他们是创始人或首席执行官时。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为这可能表明董事会与其他股东关系良好。但是,在某些情况下,过多的权力集中在该群体中。

Our information suggests that Gilead Sciences, Inc. insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$69m worth of shares. In this sort of situation, it can be more interesting to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,吉利德科学公司的内部人士拥有该公司不到1%的股份。由于它是一家大公司,我们只期望内部人士拥有其中的一小部分。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值6900万美元的股票。在这种情况下,看看这些内部人士是在买入还是卖出可能会更有趣。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散户投资者在内的公众拥有该公司14%的股份,因此不容忽视。这种所有权规模虽然可观,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 4 warning signs for Gilead Sciences you should know about.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,考虑风险。每家公司都有它们,我们发现了你应该知道的吉利德科学的4个警告信号。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果你像我一样,你可能需要考虑这家公司是会成长还是会萎缩。幸运的是,您可以查看这份免费报告,其中显示了分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发