share_log

Gemdale Corporation's (SHSE:600383) Last Week's 14% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

Gemdale Corporation's (SHSE:600383) Last Week's 14% Decline Must Have Disappointed Retail Investors Who Have a Significant Stake

金地集團(SHSE: 600383)上週下跌了14%,一定讓持有大量股份的散戶投資者感到失望
Simply Wall St ·  06/02 20:05

Key Insights

主要見解

  • The considerable ownership by retail investors in Gemdale indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 17 shareholders
  • 25% of Gemdale is held by Institutions
  • 金地集團零售投資者擁有相當多的持股,這意味着他們在管理和業務策略上擁有更大的發言權。
  • 17名股東持有50%的業務。
  • 機構持有金地集團25%的業務。

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Gemdale Corporation (SHSE:600383), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 46% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

要了解金地集團(SHSE:600383)真正的控制者,重要的是了解業務的所有權結構。我們可以看到,零售投資者擁有公司的46%所有權份額,也就是說,如果股票上漲(或者下跌),他們將獲得最大的受益(或損失最大)。

And following last week's 14% decline in share price, retail investors suffered the most losses.

上週股價下跌14%,零售投資者遭受了最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Gemdale.

下圖展示了金地集團的不同所有權組合。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:600383 Ownership Breakdown June 3rd 2024
SHSE:600383所有權結構圖(2024年6月3日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Gemdale?

機構持股在金地集團中扮演了什麼樣的角色?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Gemdale does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Gemdale's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到金地有機構投資者,他們持有公司相當比例的股票,這暗示了那些機構的分析師已經看過這支股票並且他們喜歡它。但是就像其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多個機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在他們在一筆'擁擠交易'中的風險。當這樣一筆交易出現問題時,多方將可能競相快速賣出股票,這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到金地的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是更多。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600383 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 3rd 2024
SHSE:600383 2024年6月3日收益和營業收入增長

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Gemdale. Our data shows that FunDe Sino Life Insurance Co., Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 22% of shares outstanding. With 8.1% and 7.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, Funde Sino Life Insurance Co., Ltd., Asset Management Arm and Shenzhen Futian Investment Holdings Co.,Ltd are the second and third largest shareholders.

我們注意到,對於金地,對沖基金沒有實質性的投資。我們的數據顯示,富邦人壽保險股份有限公司是第一大股東,持有22%的流通股。其次是富邦人壽保險股份有限公司資產管理部和深圳福田投資控股有限公司,分別持有8.1%和7.8%的流通股。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 17 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

從股東註冊表可以看到,17名股東控制了50%的所有權,意味着沒有任何一個股東擁有大多數的控股權。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of Gemdale

金地集團內部股權佔比情況

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Gemdale Corporation. But they may have an indirect interest through a corporate structure that we haven't picked up on. It's a big company, so even a small proportional interest can create alignment between the board and shareholders. In this case insiders own CN¥55m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們最近的數據顯示,內部股東持有金地集團不到1%的股權,但他們可能通過我們沒有發現的企業結構間接擁有利益。這是一家大公司,因此即使擁有小比例的股權也可以在董事會和股東之間產生一定的協調性。在這種情況下,內部人持有價值5500萬元的股票。看到董事會成員持有股票很好,但值得檢查的是這些內部人是否一直在購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 46% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Gemdale. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

擁有46%股權的大衆投資者,主要包括個人投資者,對金地集團具有一定的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能還不足以在利益方面影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 29%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有29%的發行股票。僅僅從這個事實中很難得出任何結論,因此值得探究誰擁有那些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方會通過單獨的私人公司持有公開公司的股權。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Like risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Gemdale (of which 1 is a bit concerning!) you should know about.

雖然考慮一家公司的不同持股群體很值得,但還有更重要的因素。例如風險。每家公司都有風險,我們發現了Gemdale的3個警告信號(其中1個有點令人擔憂!)你應該知道。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論