share_log

Following a 9.7% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (NYSE:ALEX) Institutional Owners

Following a 9.7% Decline Over Last Year, Recent Gains May Please Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (NYSE:ALEX) Institutional Owners

由于去年下降了9.7%,因此Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (纽交所:ALEX)的机构所有者最近的收益可能会令人满意
Simply Wall St ·  06/06 06:15

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Alexander & Baldwin's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
  • Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 机构大量持有股份意味着Alexander & Baldwin的股票价格对他们的交易行为非常敏感。
  • 前6名股东持有公司51%的股份。
  • 所有权研究结合过去的表现数据可以帮助更好地理解股票的机会。

Every investor in Alexander & Baldwin, Inc. (NYSE:ALEX) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 88% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.(NYSE:ALEX)的每个投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。机构持有88%的股份,是公司中持股最多的群体,如果股票上涨将获利最多(或者如果出现衰退则亏损最多)。

Institutional investors would probably welcome last week's 4.2% increase in the share price after a year of 9.7% losses as a sign that returns may to begin trending higher.

经过一年9.7%的亏损后,机构投资者很可能对上周股价上涨4.2%的涨势表示欢迎,看起来收益可能开始趋势上升。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Alexander & Baldwin.

让我们仔细地看看不同类型的股东可以告诉我们关于Alexander & Baldwin的什么信息。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:ALEX Ownership Breakdown June 6th 2024
NYSE:ALEX所有权分布2024年6月6日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Alexander & Baldwin?

机构所有权对Alexander & Baldwin有何影响?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

Alexander & Baldwin already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Alexander & Baldwin's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

Alexander & Baldwin已经有机构投资者在股票注册表上了。实际上,他们在公司中拥有相当一部分的股份。这可能表明该公司在投资社区中有一定的信誉度。但是最好谨慎地依赖机构投资者所带来的所谓的认证。他们也有时会犯错。当多家机构投资者持有一只股票时,总会存在着一个“拥挤的交易”的风险。当这样一笔交易出现问题时,多方面可能会竞争快速卖出该股票。在一个没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到Alexander & Baldwin的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事并不止于此。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:ALEX Earnings and Revenue Growth June 6th 2024
NYSE:ALEX利润和营业收入增长2024年6月6日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Alexander & Baldwin is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 18% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 16% and 5.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

由于机构投资者持有超过一半的已发行股份,理事会可能会注意他们的偏好。Alexander & Baldwin没有被对冲基金所持有。从我们的数据来看,最大的股东是BlackRock,Inc.,持有18%的流通股。然而,第二和第三大的股东分别持有流通股的16%和5.5%。

We did some more digging and found that 6 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们进行了更深入的研究,发现前6名股东大约占有51%的持股比例,意味着除了大股东以外,还有一些小股东,因此在一定程度上平衡了各自的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

虽然研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议以加深对股票预期表现的全面了解也是一个好习惯。虽然有部分分析师的覆盖,但该公司可能没有受到广泛的关注。因此,在未来可能会受到更多关注。

Insider Ownership Of Alexander & Baldwin

Alexander & Baldwin的内部所有权

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少捕捉到董事会成员的记录。公司管理人员向董事会报告,后者应该代表股东的利益。值得注意的是,有时高级管理人员自己也在董事会中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

We can see that insiders own shares in Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$16m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们可以看到内部人员拥有Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.的股份。这是一家大公司,所以看到这种程度的一致性是好的。内部人员持有价值1600万美元的股份(以当前价格计算)。看到内部人员进行投资是好的。您可以在这里查看最近的购买情况。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

一般公众——包括零售投资者——在公司中拥有11%的股份,因此不容易被忽略。虽然持股规模相当大,但如果决策与其他大股东不同步,这可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Alexander & Baldwin has 3 warning signs (and 2 which are a bit unpleasant) we think you should know about.

我觉得看一个公司到底由谁拥有是非常有趣的事情。但是,为了真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,需要承担风险——Alexander & Baldwin有3个警告信号(其中2个有点令人不悦),我们认为您需要了解到这些内容。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发