share_log

Owning 47% in Bentley Systems, Incorporated (NASDAQ:BSY) Means That Insiders Are Heavily Invested in the Company's Future

Owning 47% in Bentley Systems, Incorporated (NASDAQ:BSY) Means That Insiders Are Heavily Invested in the Company's Future

擁有Bentley Systems公司47%股份(納斯達克:BSY)意味着內部人士對該公司的未來有重大投資。
Simply Wall St ·  06/06 08:38

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Significant insider control over Bentley Systems implies vested interests in company growth
  • The top 8 shareholders own 54% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in Bentley Systems is 38%
  • Bentley Systems股東對公司增長有重大影響
  • 前8大股東擁有該公司54%的股份
  • Bentley Systems的機構持股比例爲38%

Every investor in Bentley Systems, Incorporated (NASDAQ:BSY) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 47% to be precise, is individual insiders. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Bentley Systems股份有限公司(納斯達克:BSY)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東。持有該公司股份數量最多的股東群體是個人內部人士,精確地說,約佔47%。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該股東群體將受益最多(或者在股票市場下滑時損失最多)。

So it follows, every decision made by insiders of Bentley Systems regarding the company's future would be crucial to them.

因此,Bentley Systems內部股東對公司未來的每個決策都至關重要。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Bentley Systems.

讓我們更詳細地了解一下各類股東對Bentley Systems的影響。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:BSY Ownership Breakdown June 6th 2024
2024年6月6日納斯達克上Bentley Systems的股權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bentley Systems?

機構持股對Bentley Systems的影響

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Bentley Systems does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Bentley Systems' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到Bentley Systems確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司的相當一部分股份。這表明受到專業投資者的一定信任,但我們不能憑此就斷言它是個好公司,因爲機構也會像個人投資者一樣,做出錯誤的投資決策。當多個機構持有一支股票的時候,總是存在着“擁擠的交易”的風險,如果這種交易出現問題,多方可能會競相快速拋售股票。這種風險在一個沒有成長曆史的公司中尤其高。請參考下面的Bentley Systems歷史收益和營業收入,但請注意,這只是整個故事的一部分。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:BSY Earnings and Revenue Growth June 6th 2024
2024年6月6日納斯達克上Bentley Systems的收益和營業收入

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Bentley Systems. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Corinne Bentley with 11% of shares outstanding. Marie Bentley is the second largest shareholder owning 9.0% of common stock, and The Vanguard Group, Inc. holds about 7.0% of the company stock. In addition, we found that Gregory Bentley, the CEO has 3.4% of the shares allocated to their name.

我們注意到對Bentley Systems沒有有意義的投資的對沖基金。從我們的數據來看,最大的股東是Corinne Bentley,擁有11%的流通股份。Marie Bentley是第二大股東,擁有9.0%的普通股,Vanguard Group Inc.持有公司約7.0%的股份。此外,我們發現總裁Gregory Bentley擁有公司3.4%的股份。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

進一步調查發現,超過一半的Bentley Systems股份歸前8位股東所有,這表明大股東和小股東的利益在一定程度上得到平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Bentley Systems

Bentley Systems內部股權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Bentley Systems, Incorporated. Insiders own US$7.3b worth of shares in the US$16b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

看來Bentley Systems的內部股東擁有公司相當大的一部分股份。內部股東在這家價值160億美元的公司中擁有價值73億美元的股份,這是非常有意義的。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 15% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Bentley Systems. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

持有15%股份的普通投資者對Bentley Systems有一定的影響力。雖然這樣的持股量可能不足以影響政策的決策,但他們仍然可以在公司政策上產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Bentley Systems .

雖然考慮公司的不同股東是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。爲此,你應該注意到Bentley Systems存在一個我們發現的1個警告信號。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論