share_log

Pinming Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688109) Insiders, Who Hold 54% of the Firm Would Be Disappointed by the Recent Pullback

Pinming Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688109) Insiders, Who Hold 54% of the Firm Would Be Disappointed by the Recent Pullback

品名科技股份有限公司 (SHSE:688109) 內部人士持有該公司54%的股份,對最近的回落感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  06/06 18:58

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Pinming Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 4 shareholders own 55% of the company
  • Institutions own 12% of Pinming Technology
  • 似乎內部人士對品名科技的增長有明顯的利益,這可以從他們持有大量股份得到證實。
  • 前 4 大股東擁有公司的 55% 股份。
  • 機構持有品名科技12%的股權。

If you want to know who really controls Pinming Technology Co., Ltd. (SHSE:688109), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 54% to be precise, is individual insiders. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

如果您想知道真正控制品名科技有限公司(SHSE:688109)的人是誰,那麼您就必須查看其股權登記簿的構成。持有公司大部分股份,佔比約54%的是多個個人內部人士,這意味着如果股票上漲(或出現下行趨勢),他們將獲益最大(或損失最大)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 17%.

上週,隨着股票下跌17%,內部持有人遭受了最大的損失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Pinming Technology.

下圖是品名科技不同所有權集團的細節。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:688109 Ownership Breakdown June 6th 2024
上海證券交易所:688109股權結構拆解 (時間:2024年6月6日)

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pinming Technology?

機構持股給我們關於品名科技的什麼啓示?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

Pinming Technology already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Pinming Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

品名科技的股權登記簿上已經有機構了。實際上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。但是,最好不要過度依賴所謂的機構投資者提供的認可。他們有時也會犯錯。當多個機構擁有某個股票時,總是存在一定風險,即它們屬於“擁擠交易。”當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方可能會競相快速拋售股票。這種風險在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面看到品名科技的歷史收益和營收情況,但請記住,故事總是更加複雜。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:688109 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 6th 2024
上海證券交易所:688109收入和營收增長 (時間:2024年6月6日)

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Pinming Technology. Xujun Mo is currently the largest shareholder, with 26% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 12% and 10% of the stock. Jun Li, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

我們注意到,對於品名科技,對沖基金並沒有進行有意義的投資。目前,Xujun Mo是公司流通股份中最大的股東,持股比例爲26%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約12%和10%的股份。Jun Li是第三大股東,也是董事會成員的稱號。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 4 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前四名股東控制了公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該集團對公司的決策具有相當大的影響力。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但還是研究分析師的建議,以深入了解股票預期表現,是一個好習慣。就我們所知,該公司沒有分析師覆蓋,因此可能沒有引起注意。

Insider Ownership Of Pinming Technology

品名科技的內部人士持股比例超過了一半。這使他們擁有大量的權力。因此,他們在這家價值19億元的公司中持有10億元的股份。大多數人會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能會希望免費發現他們是否一直在買賣。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

內部人員的定義在不同國家可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計入內部人員。管理層最終向董事會回答。然而,經理往往會成爲執行董事會成員,尤其是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Pinming Technology Co., Ltd. stock. This gives them a lot of power. So they have a CN¥1.0b stake in this CN¥1.9b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

擁有22%的股份,普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,在品名科技中具有一定的影響力。雖然這些人不能決定一切,但他們確實可以對公司的運營產生真正的影響。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 22% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Pinming Technology. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

考慮到持有股份的不同集團通常都值得思考。但是,爲了更好地了解品名科技,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險這一永恒的惡魔。我們已經確定了品名科技的3個警告標誌(其中有至少1個非常重要),了解這些標誌應該是您投資過程的一部分。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 12%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有該公司股份的12%。可能要深入研究這一點。如果相關方,如內部人員,對其中一個私人公司有利益,那應該在年報中披露。私人公司也可能對公司有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Pinming Technology better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Pinming Technology (at least 1 which is significant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

擁有名爲品名科技有限公司(SHSE: 688109)所有權是一件令人振奮的事情,但是它也需要更深入地考慮許多因素。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論