share_log

Will Alector (NASDAQ:ALEC) Spend Its Cash Wisely?

Will Alector (NASDAQ:ALEC) Spend Its Cash Wisely?

Alector(納斯達克:Alec)會明智地使用現金嗎?
Simply Wall St ·  06/07 07:48

Even when a business is losing money, it's possible for shareholders to make money if they buy a good business at the right price. For example, although Amazon.com made losses for many years after listing, if you had bought and held the shares since 1999, you would have made a fortune. But while the successes are well known, investors should not ignore the very many unprofitable companies that simply burn through all their cash and collapse.

即使企業虧損,如果股東以正確的價格買入好的企業,也有可能賺錢。例如,儘管亞馬遜上市後多年處於虧損狀態,但如果您從1999年開始購買並持有股票,就會賺大錢。然而,雖然這些成功案例衆所周知,但投資者不應忽視很多虧損的公司,這些公司僅僅耗費所有現金並最終破產。

So, the natural question for Alector (NASDAQ:ALEC) shareholders is whether they should be concerned by its rate of cash burn. In this article, we define cash burn as its annual (negative) free cash flow, which is the amount of money a company spends each year to fund its growth. Let's start with an examination of the business' cash, relative to its cash burn.

那麼,Alector(納斯達克:ALEC)的股東們自然會問是否應該擔心它的現金消耗速度。在本文中,我們將現金消耗定義爲其年度(負)自由現金流,這是公司每年用於資助其增長的金額。讓我們從審查業務的現金相對於其現金消耗開始。

When Might Alector Run Out Of Money?

Alector將何時用盡現金?

A company's cash runway is the amount of time it would take to burn through its cash reserves at its current cash burn rate. When Alector last reported its March 2024 balance sheet in May 2024, it had zero debt and cash worth US$562m. Looking at the last year, the company burnt through US$199m. That means it had a cash runway of about 2.8 years as of March 2024. Arguably, that's a prudent and sensible length of runway to have. Depicted below, you can see how its cash holdings have changed over time.

一家公司的現金儲備量是指其用當前現金消耗速度消耗完現金儲備的時間。2024年3月,Alector最後一次公佈了其財務報表,當時其沒有債務,現金價值爲5.62億美元。去年,該公司消耗了1.99億美元。這意味着,截至2024年3月,其現金儲備量約爲2.8年。可以看到其現金持有情況的變化如下圖所示。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NasdaqGS:ALEC Debt to Equity History June 7th 2024
納斯達克GS:ALEC的資產負債歷史,截至2024年6月7日

How Well Is Alector Growing?

Alector的增長狀況如何?

On balance, we think it's mildly positive that Alector trimmed its cash burn by 4.6% over the last twelve months. But the revenue dip of 23% in the same period was a bit concerning. Considering both these metrics, we're a little concerned about how the company is developing. Clearly, however, the crucial factor is whether the company will grow its business going forward. For that reason, it makes a lot of sense to take a look at our analyst forecasts for the company.

總體而言,我們認爲,在過去十二個月中,Alector將其現金消耗減少了4.6%,這是一個稍微積極的跡象。但同期營收下降了23%,這有點令人擔憂。考慮到這兩個指標,我們有一些對該公司的發展感到擔憂。不過,關鍵因素顯然是該公司將來是否能增長其業務。因此,看一下我們的公司分析師預測非常有意義。

How Hard Would It Be For Alector To Raise More Cash For Growth?

Alector籌集更多資金以實現增長有多難?

Alector seems to be in a fairly good position, in terms of cash burn, but we still think it's worthwhile considering how easily it could raise more money if it wanted to. Generally speaking, a listed business can raise new cash through issuing shares or taking on debt. Commonly, a business will sell new shares in itself to raise cash and drive growth. We can compare a company's cash burn to its market capitalisation to get a sense for how many new shares a company would have to issue to fund one year's operations.

在現金消耗方面,Alector似乎處於相當不錯的位置,但我們仍然認爲,考慮一下它是否能夠輕鬆籌集更多資金是值得的。一般來說,上市公司可以通過發行股票或增加負債來籌集新資金。通常,一家企業會發售自身的新股來籌集資金並推動增長。我們可以將公司的現金消耗與其市值進行比較,以了解一家公司需要發行多少新股才能籌集一年的運營資金。

Since it has a market capitalisation of US$463m, Alector's US$199m in cash burn equates to about 43% of its market value. From this perspective, it seems that the company spent a huge amount relative to its market value, and we'd be very wary of a painful capital raising.

由於Alector的市值爲4.63億美元,其1.99億美元的現金消耗相當於其市值的約43%。從這個角度來看,似乎該公司相對於其市值花費了大量資金,我們應該非常警惕其痛苦的資本募集。

So, Should We Worry About Alector's Cash Burn?

那麼,我們應該擔心Alector的現金消耗嗎?

Even though its cash burn relative to its market cap makes us a little nervous, we are compelled to mention that we thought Alector's cash runway was relatively promising. We don't think its cash burn is particularly problematic, but after considering the range of factors in this article, we do think shareholders should be monitoring how it changes over time. Taking an in-depth view of risks, we've identified 3 warning signs for Alector that you should be aware of before investing.

儘管其現金消耗相對於市值讓我們有點緊張,但我們被迫提到,我們認爲Alector的現金儲備能力相對較好。我們並不認爲其現金消耗特別成問題,但在考慮了本文中的各種因素後,我們確實認爲股東們應該監控其變化。在深入了解風險的情況下,我們爲Alector確定了3個投資前需要知道的警示信號。

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies, and this list of stocks growth stocks (according to analyst forecasts)

當然,你可以通過其他途徑找到一項出色的投資。所以請查看這個有趣的公司免費清單,以及這個預測爲增長股的股票清單(根據分析師預測)。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論