share_log

Ningbo Zhoushan Port (SHSE:601018) Investors Are Sitting on a Loss of 11% If They Invested Five Years Ago

Ningbo Zhoushan Port (SHSE:601018) Investors Are Sitting on a Loss of 11% If They Invested Five Years Ago

如果五年前投资则宁波港(SHSE:601018)的投资者面对11%的亏损。
Simply Wall St ·  06/13 20:29

In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But even the best stock picker will only win with some selections. So we wouldn't blame long term Ningbo Zhoushan Port Company Limited (SHSE:601018) shareholders for doubting their decision to hold, with the stock down 21% over a half decade.

为了证明选择个股收益的努力是值得的,需要追求高于市场指数基金的回报。但即使是最好的股票选择者,也仅仅在个别选择上获胜。一些股票的选择是必须的。因为在过去的五年中,宁波港股票下跌了21%,因此,我们并不会责怪长期股东选择持有。

It's worthwhile assessing if the company's economics have been moving in lockstep with these underwhelming shareholder returns, or if there is some disparity between the two. So let's do just that.

值得评估公司的经济状况是否与这些不尽如人意的股东回报同时发展并步调一致,或者两者之间是否存在差异。因此,让我们来看看。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

在他的文章《格雷厄姆和多德斯维尔超级投资者》中,沃伦·巴菲特描述了股票价格并不总是反映公司价值的合理方式。考虑市场对公司的看法如何发生变化的一个不完美但简单的方法是将每股收益(EPS)的变化与股价的变动进行比较。股票价格并不总是反映公司价值的合理方式沃伦·巴菲特曾经描述过,股价并不总是理性地反映了企业的价值。评估市场对一家公司的情绪如何变化的一个有缺陷但合理的方法是将每股收益(EPS)与股价进行比较。

During the unfortunate half decade during which the share price slipped, Ningbo Zhoushan Port actually saw its earnings per share (EPS) improve by 2.4% per year. So it doesn't seem like EPS is a great guide to understanding how the market is valuing the stock. Or possibly, the market was previously very optimistic, so the stock has disappointed, despite improving EPS.

在不幸的半个十年之内,虽然股价下跌,但宁波港的每股收益(EPS)实际上每年提高了2.4%。因此,似乎EPS并不是了解市场如何对待该股票的良好指引。或者可能是因为市场先前非常乐观,所以股票尽管EPS有所改善,但依旧是一个失望的股票。

Given that EPS has increased, but the share price has fallen, it's fair to say that market sentiment around the stock has become more negative. Having said that, if the EPS gains continue we'd expect the share price to improve, longer term.

考虑到EPS增加但股价下跌,可以说市场对该股票的情绪变得更加负面。话虽如此,如果EPS增长持续下去,我们预计股价会在较长时间内得到改善。

You can see how EPS has changed over time in the image below (click on the chart to see the exact values).

您可以在下面的图片中查看每股收益如何随时间变化(单击图表以查看确切的价值)。

earnings-per-share-growth
SHSE:601018 Earnings Per Share Growth June 14th 2024
SHSE: 601018每股收益增长2024年6月14日

We're pleased to report that the CEO is remunerated more modestly than most CEOs at similarly capitalized companies. But while CEO remuneration is always worth checking, the really important question is whether the company can grow earnings going forward. It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on Ningbo Zhoushan Port's earnings, revenue and cash flow.

我们很高兴报告说,与同等资本化的公司相比,CEO的报酬较为适中。但是,虽然CEO的报酬值得核查,但真正重要的问题是该公司能否在未来增加收益。这可能非常值得查看我们有关宁波港营收,收入和现金流的免费报告。

What About Dividends?

那么分红怎么样呢?

It is important to consider the total shareholder return, as well as the share price return, for any given stock. The TSR is a return calculation that accounts for the value of cash dividends (assuming that any dividend received was reinvested) and the calculated value of any discounted capital raisings and spin-offs. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. As it happens, Ningbo Zhoushan Port's TSR for the last 5 years was -11%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

考虑任何给定股票的股东总回报和股价回报是非常重要的。TSR是一种回报计算,考虑了现金股息(假设任何收到的股息都被再投资)的价值以及任何折价的融资和分拆的计算价值。因此,对于支付丰厚股息的公司,TSR通常比股价回报高得多。恰好宁波港的过去5年的TSR为-11%,超过了前面提到的股价回报。并且毫无疑问,股息支付在很大程度上解释了这种分歧!

A Different Perspective

不同的观点

We're pleased to report that Ningbo Zhoushan Port shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 1.4% over one year. That's including the dividend. That certainly beats the loss of about 2% per year over the last half decade. The long term loss makes us cautious, but the short term TSR gain certainly hints at a brighter future. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks, for example - Ningbo Zhoushan Port has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

我们很高兴报告说,宁波港股东在一年内获得了1.4%的总股东回报。其中包括股息。这当然要好于在过去的半个十年中每年约2%的损失。长期亏损让我们保持谨慎,但短期的TSR增长当然暗示了更美好的未来。我认为看待长期股票价格作为业务表现的代理非常有趣。但是要真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,承担风险-宁波港有1个警示标志,我们认为您应该了解。

Of course Ningbo Zhoushan Port may not be the best stock to buy. So you may wish to see this free collection of growth stocks.

当然,宁波港可能不是最好的股票选择。因此,您可能希望查看此增长股票的免费集合。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Chinese exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在中国交易所上市的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发