share_log

Jinhai Medical Technology Limited's (HKG:2225) Stock Price Dropped 7.1% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy

Jinhai Medical Technology Limited's (HKG:2225) Stock Price Dropped 7.1% Last Week; Individual Investors Would Not Be Happy

近海医疗科技有限公司(HKG:2225)的股票价格上周下跌了7.1%;个人投资者不会开心
Simply Wall St ·  06/14 18:20

Key Insights

主要见解

  • The considerable ownership by individual investors in Jinhai Medical Technology indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
  • 49% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Guobao Chen)
  • Insider ownership in Jinhai Medical Technology is 49%
  • 锦海医疗科技的个人投资者相对较多,表明他们在管理和业务策略上具有更大的发言权。
  • 49%的公司股份由单一股东(陈国宝)持有。
  • 锦海医疗科技的内部持股比例为49%。

A look at the shareholders of Jinhai Medical Technology Limited (HKG:2225) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 51% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

看一下锦海医疗科技有限公司(HKG:2225)的股东,我们可以知道哪个群体最有权力。个人投资者以51%的股份持有公司的最大股权。换句话说,该群体可以从其对公司的投资中获益最多(或损失最多)。

While insiders, who own 49% shares weren't spared from last week's HK$439m market cap drop, individual investors as a group suffered the maximum losses

虽然持有49%股份的内部人也无法幸免于上周的4.39亿港元市值下跌,但个人投资者作为一个群体却遭受了最大的损失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Jinhai Medical Technology.

让我们更仔细地看一下不同类型的股东对锦海医疗科技的启示。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:2225 Ownership Breakdown June 14th 2024
SEHK:2225股权分布2024年6月14日

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Jinhai Medical Technology?

机构股东缺席针对锦海医疗科技的怎样的提示?

We don't tend to see institutional investors holding stock of companies that are very risky, thinly traded, or very small. Though we do sometimes see large companies without institutions on the register, it's not particularly common.

我们不会看到机构投资者持有非常高风险、交易较少或非常小的公司的股票。虽然有时会看到大公司没有机构在注册表上,但这并不是特别普遍的情况。

There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. On the other hand, it's always possible that professional investors are avoiding a company because they don't think it's the best place for their money. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Jinhai Medical Technology, for yourself, below.

没有机构持有公司股份的原因可能有很多。通常,小型新上市公司不会吸引资金管理人员的注意,因为大型资金管理人员不可能在公司中建立有意义的头寸。另一方面,专业投资者可能避开某个公司,因为他们认为这不是他们的最佳投资选择。机构投资者可能并不认为业务的历史增长令人印象深刻,或者可能存在其他因素。您可以在下面自行查看锦海医疗科技的历史收入业绩。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:2225 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 14th 2024
SEHK:2225的收益和营收增长2024年6月14日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Jinhai Medical Technology. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is Guobao Chen (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 49% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder.

对于锦海医疗科技,对冲基金没有太多的股份。根据我们的数据,最大的股东是持有49%流通股的陈国宝(他还拥有最高关键执行者的头衔)。当内部人持有公司的大量股份时,这通常被认为是一个好迹象,在这种情况下,我们很高兴看到公司内部人扮演关键利益相关者的角色。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

普通公众持有北方铜业的23%股份。虽然这个群体不能决定公司的命运,但它肯定会对公司运营方式产生真正的影响。

Insider Ownership Of Jinhai Medical Technology

锦海医疗科技的内部持股

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人士的精确定义可能是主观的,几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,如果他们是创始人或CEO,经理成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Jinhai Medical Technology Limited. Insiders have a HK$2.8b stake in this HK$5.7b business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们最新的数据显示,公司内部人持有锦海医疗科技有限公司的相当比例。内部人在这家市值为57亿港元的公司中持有2.8亿港元。我们认为这表明了内部人与股东的契合,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然相当小;一些内部人可能创立了这个业务。您可以在此处查看那些内部人是否在买卖。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 51% of Jinhai Medical Technology shares. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

大部分由个人投资者组成的公众股东共持有锦海医疗科技的51%股份。具有这种所有权,散户投资者可以共同参与影响股东回报的决策,如股息政策和董事任命。他们还可以行使否决获利可能不高的收购或合并的权力。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Jinhai Medical Technology that you should be aware of.

虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是非常值得的,但还有更重要的因素。例如,我们已经为锦海医疗科技确定了1个警告信号,您应该知道。

If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.

如果您更愿意查看另一家具有潜在更强财务状况的公司,请不要错过这份由强大财务数据支撑的有趣公司的免费列表。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发