share_log

Here's Why Moog (NYSE:MOG.A) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly

Here's Why Moog (NYSE:MOG.A) Can Manage Its Debt Responsibly

以下是爲什麼Moog(紐交所:MOG.A)能夠負責地管理其債務
Simply Wall St ·  06/17 09:23

David Iben put it well when he said, 'Volatility is not a risk we care about. What we care about is avoiding the permanent loss of capital.' So it might be obvious that you need to consider debt, when you think about how risky any given stock is, because too much debt can sink a company. Importantly, Moog Inc. (NYSE:MOG.A) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

David Iben稱:“波動性不是我們關注的風險。我們關心的是避免永久性資本損失。” 因此,當您考慮一個給定股票的風險時,需要考慮債務,因爲過多的債務可能使一家公司陷入困境。重要的是,Moog Inc.(NYSE:MOG.A)確實存在債務。但真正的問題是,這筆債務是否會使公司陷入風險。

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時有危險?

Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

債務資助企業,直到企業無法通過新的資本或自由現金流償還債務爲止。在最壞的情況下,如果一個公司不能償還其債權人,它會破產。然而,常見的(但依然令人痛苦的)情況是,公司需要以低價籌集新的股本資本,從而永久性地稀釋股東的股權。當然,很多公司使用債務來融資增長,而沒有任何負面影響。考慮一個公司的負債水平的第一步是考慮公司的現金和負債合起來。

How Much Debt Does Moog Carry?

Moog的負債有多大?

The chart below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that Moog had US$948.6m in debt in March 2024; about the same as the year before. On the flip side, it has US$59.1m in cash leading to net debt of about US$889.5m.

下面的圖表(點擊可放大)顯示,Moog在2024年3月有948.6億美元的債務;與前一年大致相同。另一方面,它擁有總計59.1億美元的現金,因此淨債務約爲889.5億美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:MOG.A Debt to Equity History June 17th 2024
NYSE:MOG.A資產負債歷史,截至2024年6月17日

How Healthy Is Moog's Balance Sheet?

Moog的資產負債表狀況如何?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Moog had liabilities of US$1.00b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$1.28b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$59.1m and US$1.21b worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$1.01b.

根據最近公佈的資產負債表,Moog有100億美元的負債到期,應在12個月內償還,以及128億美元的負債超過12個月到期。另一方面,它擁有59.1億美元的現金和121億美元的應收賬款,應在一年內到期。因此,其負債超過現金和(短期)應收賬款的總和101億美元。

Given Moog has a market capitalization of US$5.13b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. But there are sufficient liabilities that we would certainly recommend shareholders continue to monitor the balance sheet, going forward.

考慮到Moog的市值爲51.3億美元,很難相信這些負債會對其構成威脅。但負債足夠大,我們肯定建議股東繼續關注資產負債表情況。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們通過查看淨債務除以利息、稅、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA)並計算其利息費用(利息覆蓋)來相對衡量公司的負債水平。這樣,我們考慮債務的絕對規模以及支付的利息費用。

Moog has net debt worth 1.9 times EBITDA, which isn't too much, but its interest cover looks a bit on the low side, with EBIT at only 5.2 times the interest expense. While these numbers do not alarm us, it's worth noting that the cost of the company's debt is having a real impact. Importantly, Moog grew its EBIT by 31% over the last twelve months, and that growth will make it easier to handle its debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Moog can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

Moog的淨債務爲EBITDA的1.9倍,這不算太多,但其利息覆蓋率看起來有點低,EBIT僅爲利息費用的5.2倍。雖然這些數字並不讓我們擔憂,但值得注意的是,公司的財務費用確實產生了實質性影響。重要的是,Moog在過去12個月內將EBIT增長了31%,這種增長將使其更容易處理其債務。分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是需要關注的領域。但最終,企業未來的盈利能力將決定Moog能否隨着時間推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您想了解專業人士的看法,您可能會發現有關分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. In the last three years, Moog created free cash flow amounting to 11% of its EBIT, an uninspiring performance. For us, cash conversion that low sparks a little paranoia about is ability to extinguish debt.

最後,儘管稅務局可能熱愛會計利潤,但借款人只接受真實的現金。因此,我們始終檢查多少EBIT被轉化爲自由現金流。在過去的三年中,Moog創造了相當於其EBIT的11%的自由現金流,這是一個令人失望的表現。對於我們來說,這麼低的現金轉化率引發了一些關於其消除債務的能力的擔憂。

Our View

我們的觀點

On our analysis Moog's EBIT growth rate should signal that it won't have too much trouble with its debt. But the other factors we noted above weren't so encouraging. For instance it seems like it has to struggle a bit to convert EBIT to free cash flow. Considering this range of data points, we think Moog is in a good position to manage its debt levels. Having said that, the load is sufficiently heavy that we would recommend any shareholders keep a close eye on it. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Moog you should be aware of.

我們的分析顯示,Moog的EBIT增長率應該表明它不會遇到太多的債務問題。但我們上面提到的其他因素並不那麼令人鼓舞。例如,它似乎需要努力才能將EBIT轉換爲自由現金流。考慮到這些數據點的範圍,我們認爲Moog處於管理其債務水平的良好位置。話雖如此,負擔是足夠沉重的,我們建議任何股東都要密切關注它。在分析負債水平時,資產負債表是明顯的開始地點。但最終,每個公司都可能存在超出資產負債表以外的風險。典型例子:我們發現Moog存在一項警告標誌,您應該意識到。

If you're interested in investing in businesses that can grow profits without the burden of debt, then check out this free list of growing businesses that have net cash on the balance sheet.

如果您有興趣投資能夠在不負債的情況下增長利潤的企業,請查看這份免費列表,其中列出了在資產負債表上擁有淨現金的成長型企業。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論