share_log

Institutional Owners May Ignore TETRA Technologies, Inc.'s (NYSE:TTI) Recent US$51m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

Institutional Owners May Ignore TETRA Technologies, Inc.'s (NYSE:TTI) Recent US$51m Market Cap Decline as Longer-term Profits Stay in the Green

机构投资者可能会忽略TETRA Technologies, Inc.(纽交所:TTI)最近5,100万美元的市值下跌,因为长期利润保持稳定。
Simply Wall St ·  06/18 10:23

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, TETRA Technologies' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • A total of 14 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
  • Insiders own 10% of TETRA Technologies
  • 鉴于机构在该股票中所持有的大量股份,脂鲤技术的股价可能会因他们的交易决策而变得脆弱。
  • 共有14名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,占有50%的所有权。
  • 内部人员持有脂鲤技术的10%股份。

Every investor in TETRA Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:TTI) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 70% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

所有脂鲤技术股票的股东(NYSE:TTI)都应该了解最强大的股东群体。随着机构持有70%的股份,该集团拥有公司的最大股份。也就是说,如果股票上涨,该集团将获得最多的利益(或者如果有下降,将失去最多的利益)。

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$422m last week. However, the 12% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

在上周公司的市值下降至4.22亿美元后,机构投资者是受到最大影响的一个群体。但是,股东们在一年中获得了12%的回报,这可能减轻了打击。但他们很可能对未来的损失持谨慎态度。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of TETRA Technologies.

在下图中,我们放大了脂鲤技术的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:TTI Ownership Breakdown June 18th 2024
NYSE:TTI所有权分布2024年6月18日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About TETRA Technologies?

机构所有权对脂鲤技术有何含义?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in TETRA Technologies. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of TETRA Technologies, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

正如您所见,机构投资者在脂鲤技术有着相当大的持股。这意味着为那些机构工作的分析师已经研究了该股票并喜欢它。但是,就像任何其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。如果两个大型机构投资者同时尝试卖出股票,很容易看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得检查脂鲤技术过去的盈利轨迹(如下所示)。当然,要记住还有其他因素需要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:TTI Earnings and Revenue Growth June 18th 2024
NYSE:TTI盈利和营业收入增长2024年6月18日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in TETRA Technologies. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 7.8% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 6.3% and 5.8% of the stock. Furthermore, CEO Brady Murphy is the owner of 1.7% of the company's shares.

由于机构投资者持有已发行股票的一半以上,董事会可能需要注意他们的偏好。对于脂鲤技术而言,对冲基金持股不多。目前黑石集团是最大的股东,占有7.8%的流通股。与之相比,第二和第三大股东持有约6.3%和5.8%的股份。此外,首席执行官布雷迪·墨菲拥有公司1.7%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 14 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

对我们的所有权数据进行更仔细的研究表明,前14名股东拥有50%的股权,意味着没有单一股东持有绝对多数股权。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of TETRA Technologies

脂鲤技术的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人士的精确定义可能是主观的,几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,如果他们是创始人或CEO,经理成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in TETRA Technologies, Inc.. Insiders have a US$43m stake in this US$422m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,内部人员在脂鲤技术中持有很大的股份。内部人员拥有这家价值4.22亿美元的公司的4300万美元的股份。我们认为这显示了与股东的一致性,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然很小;一些内部人员可能创办了这家公司。您可以单击此处查看内部人员是否一直在购买或出售股票。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公众(包括散户投资者)拥有公司的20%股份,因此不能轻易忽略。虽然这个群体不能必然占据主导地位,但它肯定可以对公司的运营产生实际的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand TETRA Technologies better, we need to consider many other factors. Be aware that TETRA Technologies is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

总之,了解持股人的不同群体始终是值得考虑的问题。但是,要更好地了解脂鲤技术,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。请注意,脂鲤技术在我们的投资分析中有一个警告信号,您应该知道……

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发