share_log

Wondershare Technology Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300624) 3.8% Loss Last Week Hit Both Individual Investors Who Own 52% as Well as Institutions

Wondershare Technology Group Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:300624) 3.8% Loss Last Week Hit Both Individual Investors Who Own 52% as Well as Institutions

萬興科技集團股份有限公司(SZSE:300624)上週下跌了3.8%,既影響了佔52%的個人投資者,也影響了機構投資者。
Simply Wall St ·  06/20 18:53

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Wondershare Technology Group's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 43% ownership
  • Insider ownership in Wondershare Technology Group is 15%
  • 萬興科技的大量零售投資者持股表明關鍵決策受到更廣泛股東的影響。
  • 共有25位投資者擁有該公司的大多數股份,佔公司股份43%。
  • 萬興科技的內部擁有權爲15%。

A look at the shareholders of Wondershare Technology Group Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300624) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 52% to be precise, is retail investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

簡單地看一下萬興科技的股東就可以了解哪一組最具有影響力。在該公司持有的股票數量最多的一組人中,約佔52%的爲零售投資者。換句話說,該組人從其對公司的投資中獲得最大的收益(或跌幅)。

While institutions who own 18% came under pressure after market cap dropped to CN¥10b last week,retail investors took the most losses.

雖然機構投資者持有18%的股份,但上週市值下降至100億元后,零售投資者遭受了最大的損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Wondershare Technology Group, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究萬興科技的每種所有者類型,首先從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300624 Ownership Breakdown June 20th 2024
SZSE:300624股權分佈於2024年6月20日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Wondershare Technology Group?

機構擁有權告訴我們萬興科技已經被投資機構認可。但是,最好還是警惕依賴所謂的機構投資者提供的認證信息。他們也有時會犯錯。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總存在一個“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易失敗時,多個方面可能會競相快速出售股票。當公司沒有增長曆史時,這種風險更大。您可以看到萬興科技的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住這個故事並不止這些。

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

Wondershare Technology Group already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Wondershare Technology Group's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

萬興科技已經在股份名冊上註冊了機構投資者,他們確實擁有公司的一定比例。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度,但是最好不要過分依賴它。他們也有時會犯錯。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總存在一個“擁擠交易”的風險。當這樣的交易失敗時,多個方面可能會競相快速出售股票。當公司沒有增長曆史時,這種風險更大。您可以看到萬興科技的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住這個故事並不止這些。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300624 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 20th 2024
SZSE:300624盈利和營業收入增長於2024年6月20日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Wondershare Technology Group. With a 15% stake, CEO Tobee Wu is the largest shareholder. With 12% and 2.4% of the shares outstanding respectively, Shenzhen Yixing Investment Co., Ltd. and National Council for Social Security Fund are the second and third largest shareholders.

我們注意到,對萬興科技並沒有太多相關投資的對沖基金。首席執行官吳斌擁有15%的股份,是最大的股東。深圳易興投資有限公司和全國社會保障基金分別擁有12%和2.4%的流通股。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of Wondershare Technology Group

似乎內部人員擁有萬興科技的相當大比例。市值僅爲100億元,而內部人員自己擁有16億人民幣的股票。這是相當重要的。大多數人會認爲這表明在這樣的大型公司中與股東的充分對齊。您可以單擊此處查看這些內部人員是否購買或出售。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

雖然內部人員的精確定義可能具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果經理是創始人或CEO,那麼他們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Wondershare Technology Group Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥10b, and insiders have CN¥1.6b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

通常,一般公衆,即個人投資者,持有萬興科技相當大比例的股份,佔到了52%左右,表明這是一隻相當主流的股票。這種所有權規模爲一般公衆投資者賦予了某些集體權力。他們可以並且可能會對執行薪酬、股息政策和擬議的業務收購等事項產生影響。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 52% stake in Wondershare Technology Group, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 14%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們的數據表明,私有公司持有該公司14%的股份。單憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,所以值得研究誰擁有這些私有公司。有時候,內部人員或其他相關方可以通過單獨的私人公司擁有公共公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

雖然考慮所有擁有一家公司的群體很重要,但還有其他更重要的因素。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想發現分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份有關分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論