share_log

In the Wake of Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LYEL) Latest US$130m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

In the Wake of Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LYEL) Latest US$130m Market Cap Drop, Institutional Owners May Be Forced to Take Severe Actions

在LYEL的最新1.3億市值下跌之後,機構投資者可能被迫採取嚴厲措施。
Simply Wall St ·  06/21 06:33

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Lyell Immunopharma implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 6 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 機構對Lyell免疫藥物的大量持股意味着他們對公司的股價有顯著影響。
  • 前6大股東擁有公司51%的股份。
  • 分析師預測以及所有者數據可以給我們提供有關業務前景的強烈想法。

A look at the shareholders of Lyell Immunopharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:LYEL) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 52% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

觀察Lyell Immunopharma, Inc. (NASDAQ: LYEL)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。我們可以看到機構佔有這家公司的大部分股權,擁有52%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最多的利益(或如果經濟下滑,將損失最多)。

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$130m. The recent loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 37% for stockholders, may not sit well with this group of investors. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. Hence, if weakness in Lyell Immunopharma's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

因此,基金可能需要賣出股票,這對個人投資者可能不理想。機構或“流動性提供者”掌控大量資金,因此這些類型的投資者通常對股票價格的變動具有很大的影響力。因此,如果Lyell免疫藥物的股價繼續走弱,機構投資者可能會感到被迫賣出股票,這對個人投資者可能不理想。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lyell Immunopharma, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入了解Lyell免疫藥物的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:LYEL Ownership Breakdown June 21st 2024
NasdaqGS: LYEL所有權分佈2024年6月21日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lyell Immunopharma?

機構所有權告訴我們關於Lyell免疫藥物的什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

We can see that Lyell Immunopharma does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Lyell Immunopharma's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

我們可以看到Lyell Immunopharma確實擁有機構投資者,他們持有公司的很大部分股票。這表明專業投資者中有一些可信度。但我們不能僅憑這個事實,因爲有時機構也會做出錯誤的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多個機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看一下Lyell免疫藥物下面的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:LYEL Earnings and Revenue Growth June 21st 2024
NasdaqGS: LYEL業績和營收增長2024年6月21日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Lyell Immunopharma. The company's largest shareholder is Arch Venture Partners, L.P., with ownership of 14%. GSK plc is the second largest shareholder owning 12% of common stock, and Mwg Management Ltd. holds about 7.9% of the company stock.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半以上的股份,因此它們可以集體行使重大的權力。我們注意到對於Lyell Immunopharma來說,對沖基金並沒有意義。該公司最大的股東是Arch Venture Partners,L.P.,持有14%的股權。GSK plc是第二大股東,持有普通股的12%,Mwg Management Ltd.持有公司股份的約7.9%。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 6 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒也是有意義的,以知道風向如何。就我們所知,目前並沒有該公司的分析師覆蓋。因此,可能被忽略了。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Lyell Immunopharma

Lyell免疫藥物的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$19m worth of the US$535m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們可以看到個人擁有Lyell Immunopharma, Inc.股份。就個人而言,內部人員共擁有價值1900萬美元的價值美元公司股份。看到內部人員進行了一些投資是好的,但是了解一下這些內部人員是否一直在購買股票是值得的。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 12% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Lyell Immunopharma. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有12%的股份,廣大公衆,主要包括個人投資者,對Lyell Immunopharma造成了一定影響。這種所有權的規模雖然相當大,但如果決策不與其他大股東保持同步,則可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 20% stake in Lyell Immunopharma. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.

私人股權投資公司持有Lyell免疫藥物20%的股份。這表明他們在重要的政策決策方面可能具有影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權基金長揸,但一般來說,他們的投資時間較短,不會在公共公司中投資,而與名字相同的一樣。過一段時間後,他們可能會尋求出售和重新分配資金。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有權

It appears to us that public companies own 12% of Lyell Immunopharma. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

我們看到公共公司持有Lyell Immunopharma的12%。很難說準,但這表明它們具有相互交織的業務利益。這可能是一種戰略性利益,因此值得關注這個領域的所有權變化。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Lyell Immunopharma better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 5 warning signs for Lyell Immunopharma (2 shouldn't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

考慮股東的不同群體總是值得的。但是,要更好地了解Lyell Immunopharma,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們發現了5個警示信號,表示Lyell Immunopharma存在風險(其中有2個不應被忽視!)在這裏投資之前,您應該注意這些警示信號。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論