share_log

Recent 5.8% Pullback Would Hurt Ganyuan Foods Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002991) Insiders

Recent 5.8% Pullback Would Hurt Ganyuan Foods Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002991) Insiders

最近的5.8%回撤将对甘源食品股份有限公司(SZSE:002991)内部人士造成伤害。
Simply Wall St ·  06/21 20:02

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant insider control over Ganyuan Foods implies vested interests in company growth
  • 57% of the company is held by a single shareholder (Binsheng Yan)
  • Institutions own 20% of Ganyuan Foods
  • 甘源食品的重要内部控制意味着股东在公司的成长方向上有既得利益。
  • 57%的公司股份由单一股东(晏斌圣)持有。
  • 机构拥有甘源食品的20%股份。

If you want to know who really controls Ganyuan Foods Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002991), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 63% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想知道谁真正控制甘源食品股份有限公司(SZSE:002991),那么您需要看一下该公司股份持有者构成。我们可以看到个人内部股东持有了该公司63%的所有权。换句话说,该集团面对的可能出现的上涨或下跌风险最大。

As market cap fell to CN¥5.9b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.

随着市值去年下跌至59亿元,内部股东将面临比公司其他股东群体更大的损失。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Ganyuan Foods.

下面的图表展示了甘源食品不同股东群体的股份情况。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:002991 Ownership Breakdown June 22nd 2024
SZSE:002991所有权结构分布图 2024年6月22日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ganyuan Foods?

机构持股情况能告诉我们关于甘源食品的什么信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Ganyuan Foods. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Ganyuan Foods' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在甘源食品中持有相当数量的股份。这表明专业投资者对该公司有一定的信誉,但我们不能仅仅依靠这个事实,因为机构有时会做出错误的投资决策,就像每个人一样。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,股价可能会快速下跌。因此,值得下面的甘源食品收益历史图表的参考。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:002991 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 22nd 2024
SZSE:002991收益和营业收入增长图表 2024年6月22日

Ganyuan Foods is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Binsheng Yan is the largest shareholder with 57% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.9% by the third-largest shareholder.

甘源食品不是由对冲基金所持有。我们的数据显示,晏斌圣是最大的股东,持有57%的流通股份。由于持有如此大的股份,我们推断他们对公司的未来具有重要控制权。为作比较,第二大股东持股量约为6.1%,第三大股东持股量为4.9%。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师建议是了解股票预期表现的更深入的做法。相当多的分析师都对该股票进行了研究,因此您可以轻松地查看预测增长。

Insider Ownership Of Ganyuan Foods

甘源食品的内部股权情况

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,在管辖范围之间会有所不同。我们的数据反映了个人内部人员,至少涵盖了董事会成员。管理层最终对董事会负责。但是,经理担任执行董事会成员并非不寻常,特别是如果他们是创始人或CEO。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Ganyuan Foods Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a CN¥3.7b stake in this CN¥5.9b business. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的信息表明,内部股东持有甘源食品股份有限公司超过一半。这使得他们能够有效地掌控公司。因此,他们在这家市值达到59亿元的公司中拥有37亿元的股份。大多数人会认为这是一个好的迹象,表明内部股东与股东拥有强大的一致性。您可以点击这里查看这些内部股东是否有买卖行为。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

With a 16% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Ganyuan Foods. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

拥有16%的普通股股份的公众大多由个人投资者组成,对甘源食品有一定的影响力。虽然这个群体不能完全决定公司的大局,但肯定对公司的经营产生了实际的影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Ganyuan Foods better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Ganyuan Foods has 2 warning signs (and 1 which is significant) we think you should know about.

考虑到拥有某家公司的股票的不同股东群体总是值得思考的问题,但要更好地理解甘源食品,我们需要考虑许多其他因素。例如风险——我们认为甘源食品存在2个警示信号(其中1个是重大警示信号),您可以点击此处了解详情。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发