share_log

Chongqing Department StoreLtd's (SHSE:600729) Earnings Growth Rate Lags the 1.9% CAGR Delivered to Shareholders

Chongqing Department StoreLtd's (SHSE:600729) Earnings Growth Rate Lags the 1.9% CAGR Delivered to Shareholders

重庆百货(SHSE:600729)盈利增长率低于股东获得的1.9%年复合增长率
Simply Wall St ·  06/22 20:57

In order to justify the effort of selecting individual stocks, it's worth striving to beat the returns from a market index fund. But the main game is to find enough winners to more than offset the losers At this point some shareholders may be questioning their investment in Chongqing Department Store Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:600729), since the last five years saw the share price fall 19%.

为了证明选择个股的努力是有价值的,值得努力打败市场指数基金的回报。 但主要的目的是找到足够的赢家以抵消输家。此时,一些股东可能会对重庆百货股份有限公司(SHSE:600729)的投资感到质疑,因为过去五年股价下跌了19%。

If the past week is anything to go by, investor sentiment for Chongqing Department StoreLtd isn't positive, so let's see if there's a mismatch between fundamentals and the share price.

如果过去一周是参考的话,我们可以发现重庆百货股份有限公司的投资者情绪不是很好,因此让我们看看基本面和股票价格之间是否存在不匹配。

In his essay The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville Warren Buffett described how share prices do not always rationally reflect the value of a business. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price.

在他的文章《格雷厄姆和多德斯维尔超级投资者》中,沃伦·巴菲特描述了股票价格并不总是反映公司价值的合理方式。考虑市场对公司的看法如何发生变化的一个不完美但简单的方法是将每股收益(EPS)的变化与股价的变动进行比较。股票价格并不总是反映公司价值的合理方式沃伦·巴菲特曾经描述过,股价并不总是理性地反映了企业的价值。评估市场对一家公司的情绪如何变化的一个有缺陷但合理的方法是将每股收益(EPS)与股价进行比较。

While the share price declined over five years, Chongqing Department StoreLtd actually managed to increase EPS by an average of 7.9% per year. Given the share price reaction, one might suspect that EPS is not a good guide to the business performance during the period (perhaps due to a one-off loss or gain). Alternatively, growth expectations may have been unreasonable in the past.

虽然股价在五年内下跌,但重庆百货股份有限公司每股收益实际上每年平均增长了7.9%。考虑到股价的反应,人们可能会怀疑EPS指导该期间业务绩效是否良好(可能由于一次性损失或收益)。或者,过去的增长期望可能是不切实际的。增加稳定的股息并不能真正解释股价为什么下跌。然而,营业收入每年以复合年均15%的速度下降。由于收入疲软以及现金支出增加,市场可能认为,它的黄金时期已经过去。

Generally speaking we'd hope to see stronger share price increases on the back of sustained EPS growth, but other metrics may hold a clue to why the share price performance is relatively modest.

一般来说,我们希望看到持续的EPS增长带来更强劲的股价增长,但其他指标可能会解释股价表现相对温和的原因。

The steady dividend doesn't really explain why the share price is down. However, revenue has declined at a compound annual rate of 15% per year. With revenue weak, and increased payouts of cash, the market might be taking the view that its best days are behind it.

SHSE:600729营收和收益增长2024年6月23日。

The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

下面的图表显示了收益和营收随时间的变化情况(通过单击图像揭示确切的值)。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:600729 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 23rd 2024
SHSE:600729股票于2024年6月23日发布了盈利和营业收入增长报告。

We know that Chongqing Department StoreLtd has improved its bottom line lately, but what does the future have in store? You can see what analysts are predicting for Chongqing Department StoreLtd in this interactive graph of future profit estimates.

我们知道近期重庆百货股份有限公司的净利润已经改善,但未来会发生什么? 您可以在未来利润预测的交互式图表中查看分析师对重庆百货股份有限公司的预测。

What About Dividends?

那么分红怎么样呢?

When looking at investment returns, it is important to consider the difference between total shareholder return (TSR) and share price return. The TSR incorporates the value of any spin-offs or discounted capital raisings, along with any dividends, based on the assumption that the dividends are reinvested. So for companies that pay a generous dividend, the TSR is often a lot higher than the share price return. As it happens, Chongqing Department StoreLtd's TSR for the last 5 years was 9.6%, which exceeds the share price return mentioned earlier. And there's no prize for guessing that the dividend payments largely explain the divergence!

在考虑投资回报时,重要的是考虑总股东回报(TSR)和股票回报之间的差异。 TSR包括任何剥离或折让的资本筹集(基于股息被重新投资的假设),以及任何股息。因此,对于支付慷慨的股息公司而言,TSR通常比股票回报高得多。就中国神威药业集团而言,其TSR在过去5年中达到了75%。这超过了我们之前提到的股票回报。该公司支付的股息已经提高了总股东回报。总股东回报股票回报 TSR包含股息再投资的假设下,分拆或折价融资的任何价值,以及任何股息。因此,对于支付丰厚股息的公司, TSR通常比股票回报高得多。恰好,过去5年重庆百货股份有限公司的TSR为9.6%,超过了前面提到的股票回报。并且毫不奇怪地说,股息支付主要解释了差异!

A Different Perspective

不同的观点

The total return of 14% received by Chongqing Department StoreLtd shareholders over the last year isn't far from the market return of -14%. The silver lining is that longer term investors would have made a total return of 1.9% per year over half a decade. If the fundamental data remains strong, and the share price is simply down on sentiment, then this could be an opportunity worth investigating. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Even so, be aware that Chongqing Department StoreLtd is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...

重庆商业大厦有限公司股东在过去一年内获得了14%的总回报,与市场回报-14%相差不远。好消息是,较长期的投资者在过去五年中每年收获1.9%的总回报。如果基本数据仍然强劲,股价只是因为情绪而下跌,那么这可能是值得研究的机会。我觉得以股票价格作为业务表现的代理来查看较长期的股票价格非常有趣。但是为了真正获得洞察力,我们还需要考虑其他信息。即便如此,请注意,重庆商业大厦有限公司在我们的投资分析中显示出2个警示信号,您应该知道......

But note: Chongqing Department StoreLtd may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies with past earnings growth (and further growth forecast).

但请注意:重庆百货股份有限公司可能不是最好的购买股票。因此,看看这个自由列表,其中包含过去收益增长的有趣公司(以及更多的增长预测)。

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Chinese exchanges.

请注意,本文引用的市场回报反映了目前在中国交易所上市的股票的市场加权平均回报。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或电邮 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发