share_log

Retail Investors Among Shenzhen Dynanonic Co., Ltd's (SZSE:300769) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 7.9% Price Drop

Retail Investors Among Shenzhen Dynanonic Co., Ltd's (SZSE:300769) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 7.9% Price Drop

德方纳米(SZSE:300769)的最大股东之一是散户投资者,上周7.9%的股价下跌给他们带来冲击。
Simply Wall St ·  06/23 20:35

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significant control over Shenzhen Dynanonic by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 50% of the business is held by the top 24 shareholders
  • Insider ownership in Shenzhen Dynanonic is 31%
  • 零售投资者对深圳德方纳米的重大控制意味着,普通公众具有更多影响管理和治理相关决策的权力。
  • 最高的24位股东持有公司50%的股份。
  • 深圳德方纳米的内部所有权为31%。

Every investor in Shenzhen Dynanonic Co., Ltd (SZSE:300769) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 44% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

深圳德方纳米股份有限公司(SZSE:300769)的每个投资者都应该了解最强大的股东群体。而拥有最大份额的群体则是持有44%股权的零售投资者。换句话说,该集团可能获得最多(或失去最多)的回报。

While the holdings of retail investors took a hit after last week's 7.9% price drop, insiders with their 31% also suffered.

尽管零售投资者的持股在上周的7.9%股价下跌后受到打击,拥有31%股权的内部人员也遭受了损失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shenzhen Dynanonic, beginning with the chart below.

让我们更深入地了解深圳德方纳米的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。

ownership-breakdown
SZSE:300769 Ownership Breakdown June 24th 2024
SZSE:300769 2024年6月24日所有权比例

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Dynanonic?

机构投资者拥有相当比例的深圳德方纳米的股份。这意味着为那些机构工作的分析师们看到了这只股票,他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。当多个机构拥有某只股票时,总会存在他们处于"拥挤的交易"。当这样的交易出现问题时,多个方面可能会争相迅速出售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到深圳德方纳米的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是更加复杂。

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Shenzhen Dynanonic. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shenzhen Dynanonic's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,机构投资者在深圳德方纳米中有相当比例的股份。这意味着为那些机构工作的分析师看到了这只股票,他们喜欢它。但就像其他人一样,他们也可能是错的。当多个机构拥有某只股票时,总会存在他们处于"拥挤的交易"。当这样的交易出现问题时,多个方面可能会争相迅速出售股票。在没有增长历史的公司中,这种风险更高。您可以在下面看到深圳德方纳米的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是更加复杂。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SZSE:300769 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 24th 2024
SZSE:300769 2024年6月24日收益和营业收入增长

Shenzhen Dynanonic is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Xuewen Ji, with ownership of 14%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 4.1% of the stock. Lingyong Kong, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.

深圳德方纳米不是由对冲基金持有的。公司最大的股东是纪学文,持有14%的股份。相比之下,第二大和第三大股东持有约13%和4.1%的股份。同时,第二大股东孔令勇也是该公司的首席执行官。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 24 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

仔细观察我们的所有权数据可以发现,前24名股东持有的股份总合占50%,意味着没有单一股东占有多数。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以深入了解股票的预期表现。有许多分析师对这支股票进行了覆盖,因此了解他们的预测可能值得一试。

Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Dynanonic

看起来内幕人员拥有深圳德方纳米的相当比例。内幕人员持有该8.3亿人民币公司价值25亿人民币的股份。这是相当有意义的投资。您可以在这里查看这些内幕人员最近是否一直在购买。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人士的精确定义可能是主观的,几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,如果他们是创始人或CEO,经理成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Shenzhen Dynanonic Co., Ltd. Insiders own CN¥2.5b worth of shares in the CN¥8.3b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

通常个人投资者的公众拥有深圳德方纳米44%的股份。尽管拥有这么多的股份可能不足以改变公司政策,如果该决策与其他大股东不一致。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 44% stake in Shenzhen Dynanonic. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体是值得的,但有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经确定了深圳德方纳米存在1个警告信号,这是您应该了解的。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Shenzhen Dynanonic that you should be aware of.

虽然考虑公司不同的所有群体是值得的,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经确定了深圳德方纳米存在1个警告信号,这是您应该了解的。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发