share_log

After Losing 0.6% in the Past Year, JOYY Inc. (NASDAQ:YY) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

After Losing 0.6% in the Past Year, JOYY Inc. (NASDAQ:YY) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

在過去一年中下跌0.6%後,歡聚公司 (納斯達克:YY) 的機構持有者一定會對最近的收益感到寬慰。
Simply Wall St ·  06/24 07:21

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in JOYY implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
  • Insider ownership in JOYY is 41%
  • 機構對歡聚的實質性持股意味着他們對公司股價有重大影響。
  • 總共有5位投資者擁有該公司的52%股權。
  • 歡聚內部持有股份比例爲41%。

A look at the shareholders of JOYY Inc. (NASDAQ:YY) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 43% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

看一眼歡聚公司(納斯達克證券代碼:YY)的股東們,我們就可以知道哪個群體最強大。 持有最大權益的是機構,持股比例爲43%。也就是說,如果股價上漲(或者如果出現下滑),這個群體將獲益最大(或者損失最大)。

Institutional investors would appreciate the 3.6% increase in share price last week, given their one-year losses have totalled a disappointing 0.6%.

機構投資者對上週股價的3.6%漲幅感到滿意,因爲他們一年的虧損總額達到了令人失望的0.6%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about JOYY.

讓我們仔細查看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們什麼關於歡聚。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqGS:YY Ownership Breakdown June 24th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼YY 2024年6月24日持股情況分析

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About JOYY?

機構持股告訴我們什麼關於歡聚?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構衡量其業績的標準是一個近似於當地市場的指數。因此,他們通常更加關注包括在主要指數中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in JOYY. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see JOYY's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你看到的,機構投資者在歡聚中持有相當大的股權。這意味着服務於這些機構的分析師已經研究過這個股票,並且他們喜歡它。但是就像其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。當多個機構持有一支股票時,總會存在着'擁擠交易'的風險。當這種交易失敗時,多個方承諾以最快的速度拋售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以看到歡聚的歷史收益和營業收入,但要記住,故事還有更多。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqGS:YY Earnings and Revenue Growth June 24th 2024
納斯達克股票代碼YY 2024年6月24日收益和營業收入增長率分析

It looks like hedge funds own 6.0% of JOYY shares. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. With a 30% stake, CEO Xueling Li is the largest shareholder. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 6.0% of the stock.

看起來,對沖基金擁有歡聚的6.0%股份。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是相當積極的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內創造價值(並提高股價)。首席執行官Xueling Li擁有30%的股份,是最大的股東。相比之下,第二大和第三大股東持有大約10%和6.0%的股份。

On looking further, we found that 52% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.

進一步了解後,我們發現52%的股份由前5名股東持有。 換句話說,這些股東對公司的決策有相當大的影響。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

儘管研究公司的機構持股可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。有相當數量的分析師關注該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體觀點可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of JOYY

歡聚內部持股比例很高。內部人員在這家17億美元的公司中擁有7.06億美元的股份。這是非常有意義的。看看這裏,看看這些內部人員最近是否有在購買。

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,在管轄範圍之間會有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理擔任執行董事會成員並非不尋常,特別是如果他們是創始人或CEO。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in JOYY Inc.. Insiders own US$706m worth of shares in the US$1.7b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

擁有10%股權的普通公衆,主要由個人投資者組成,對歡聚有一定的影響力。雖然這種所有權可能不足以使政策決策朝他們的方向傾斜,但他們仍然可以對企業政策產生集體影響。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

With a 10% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over JOYY. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體很值得注意,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經發現了對歡聚的3個警告信號(其中一個是值得關注的!),在你投資之前你應該了解清楚這些信息。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for JOYY (1 is concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體很值得注意,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們已經發現了對歡聚的3個警告信號(其中一個是值得關注的!),在你投資之前你應該了解清楚這些信息。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論