share_log

DuPont De Nemours, Inc. (NYSE:DD) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 73%

DuPont De Nemours, Inc. (NYSE:DD) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 73%

杜邦德莫斯公司(纽交所:DD)是机构投资者的最爱,他们拥有73%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  06/24 07:33

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, DuPont de Nemours' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • The top 25 shareholders own 49% of the company
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 由于机构持有杜邦的股份较大,因此他们的交易决策可能会对杜邦德诺尔的股价造成影响。
  • 前25大股东拥有该公司的49%。
  • 内部人员最近一直在卖出。

Every investor in DuPont de Nemours, Inc. (NYSE:DD) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 73% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

杜邦德诺尔(纽交所:DD)的每位投资者都应该知道最强大的股东群体。持有公司股份最多的群体,准确地说约占73%,是机构。换句话说,该群体面临着最大的上涨潜力(或下跌风险)。

Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由于他们拥有的巨额资金和研究能力,机构所有权往往具有很大的影响力,特别是对于个人投资者来说。因此,拥有大量机构资金投资于公司往往被认为是一种令人向往的品质。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of DuPont de Nemours, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入探讨杜邦德诺尔的每种业主类型,从下面的图表开始。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:DD Ownership Breakdown June 24th 2024
纽交所:DD所有权拆分2024年6月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DuPont de Nemours?

机构持有权告诉我们关于杜邦德诺尔的什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

DuPont de Nemours already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of DuPont de Nemours, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

杜邦德诺尔的股份注册表上已经有机构投资者。事实上,他们在公司中拥有可观的股份。这意味着为那些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们喜欢它。但是像其他人一样,他们也可能出错。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出一只股票,股价大幅下跌并不罕见。因此,值得检查杜邦德诺尔的过去盈利轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素要考虑。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:DD Earnings and Revenue Growth June 24th 2024
纽交所:DD盈利和营收增长2024年6月24日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in DuPont de Nemours. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc. with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.1% and 5.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

投资者应该注意机构实际上拥有公司的一半以上的股份,因此它们可以共同拥有重大影响力。我们注意到,对杜邦德诺尔持有最多股份的是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,占流通股的11%。与此同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有流通股的7.1%和5.2%。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

经过我们的所有权数据研究,我们发现前25位股东共同拥有不到50%的股份,表明没有任何个人拥有多数利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。

Insider Ownership Of DuPont de Nemours

杜邦德诺尔的内部持股情况

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

公司内部人员的定义可能是主观的,并且在不同的司法管辖区之间是不同的。我们的数据反映了个别内部人员,至少捕捉到了董事会成员。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员也必须向董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of DuPont de Nemours, Inc.. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$73m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们最近的数据表明,内部持有杜邦德诺尔的股份不到1%。规模如此之大,我们不应该指望内部持有大量股票。他们共同拥有7300万美元的股票。董事会成员拥有股份是好事,但也可能值得检查这些内部人员是否一直在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 27% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公众,包括散户投资人,拥有该公司27%的股份,因此不能轻易忽略。虽然该群体不能决定公司的政策,但它确实可以对公司的经营产生实际影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - DuPont de Nemours has 4 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

虽然考虑一个公司的不同业主群体非常重要,但还有其他因素更为重要。例如,承担风险——杜邦德诺尔有4个警告信号,我们认为您应该知道。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想发现分析师对未来增长的预测,请不要错过这份有关分析师预测的免费报告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发