share_log

Agricultural Bank of China Limited's (HKG:1288) Market Cap Surged HK$52b Last Week, Sovereign Wealth Funds Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded

Agricultural Bank of China Limited's (HKG:1288) Market Cap Surged HK$52b Last Week, Sovereign Wealth Funds Who Have a Lot Riding on the Company Were Rewarded

上週中國農業銀行(agrbk n2510)市值增加520億港元,對該公司投資的主權財富基金獲得了回報。
Simply Wall St ·  06/24 18:27

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Agricultural Bank of China's significant sovereign wealth funds ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • 75% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
  • 中國農業銀行重要的主權財富基金持股表明,其關鍵決策受到來自更大公衆的股東的影響。
  • 前2大股東持有75%的業務。
  • 所有權研究和分析師預測數據有助於更好地了解股票市場的機會。

If you want to know who really controls Agricultural Bank of China Limited (HKG:1288), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are sovereign wealth funds with 47% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果您想了解真正控制中國農業銀行股份有限公司(HKG:1288)的人,則必須查看其股權登記簿的構成。而持有最大份額的團體是持有47%所有權的主權財富基金。換句話說,該組面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

As a result, sovereign wealth funds collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit HK$1.5t market cap following a 4.7% gain in the stock.

因此,由於公司股價上漲4.7%,市值達到HK $1.5t,主權財富基金上週的總得分最高。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Agricultural Bank of China.

在下面的圖表中,我們放大了中國農業銀行的不同所有權群體。

ownership-breakdown
SEHK:1288 Ownership Breakdown June 24th 2024
SEHK:1288所有權分佈2024年6月24日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Agricultural Bank of China?

機構所有權告訴我們有關中國農業銀行的什麼?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

We can see that Agricultural Bank of China does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Agricultural Bank of China's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,中國農業銀行確實擁有機構投資者;他們持有公司的很大一部分股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但是和其他任何人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總會有一種“擁擠的交易”風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個方可能會爭相快速出售股票。在一個沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更大。您可以查看以下中國農業銀行的歷史收益和營收,但請記住,故事總會更復雜。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SEHK:1288 Earnings and Revenue Growth June 24th 2024
SEHK:1288收益和營收增長2024年6月24日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Agricultural Bank of China. Central Huijin Investment Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 40% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 35% and 6.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我們注意到,對於中國農業銀行,對沖基金沒有意義的投資。中央匯金投資有限責任公司目前是該公司的最大股東,持有流通股的40%。同時,第二大和第三大股東分別持有流通股的35%和6.7%。

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 2 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

經過進一步挖掘,我們發現前兩個股東共同控制了公司50%以上的股份,說明他們有相當大的影響力來影響公司的決策。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Agricultural Bank of China

中國農業銀行的內部持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

內部人員的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終計數。公司管理層回答董事會,在此應代表股東利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員也在董事會上。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. It is rare to see such a low level of personal ownership, amongst the board (and it is possible that our data might be incomplete). Concerned investors should check here to see if insiders have been selling or buying.

我們注意到,我們的數據不顯示任何董事會成員持股。在董事會之間看到這麼低的個人持股是罕見的(這可能是我們的數據可能不完整)。有關人士應該在這裏檢查以查看內部人士是否在出售或購買。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

普通公衆(包括零售投資者)持有該公司12%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略它們。雖然這個群體不能決定一切,但是肯定會對公司的運營產生影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.

我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.

我喜歡更深入地了解公司過去的表現。您可以在以下詳細圖表中找到歷史收益和收入。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論