Gome Finance Technology Co., Ltd.'s (HKG:628) Market Cap Increased by HK$720m, Insiders Receive a 38% Cut
Gome Finance Technology Co., Ltd.'s (HKG:628) Market Cap Increased by HK$720m, Insiders Receive a 38% Cut
Key Insights
主要見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Gome Finance Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- Juan Du owns 61% of the company
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 內部人士似乎對國美金融科技的成長有着濃厚的興趣。這可以從他們擁有的大量股份中看出。
- Juan Du擁有該公司的61%股份。
- 公司過去的業績以及所有權數據,有助於形成對業務前景的強烈想法。
Every investor in Gome Finance Technology Co., Ltd. (HKG:628) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual insiders own the lion's share in the company with 38% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
Gome Finance Technology Co.,Ltd.(HKG:628)的每個投資者都應該注意最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,個人內部人員擁有該公司的大部分股份,佔有38%的所有權。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最大的收益(或在經濟衰退時蒙受最大的損失)
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit HK$1.2b market cap following a 18% gain in the stock.
因此,內部人士在上週股價上漲18%後,該公司市值達到了12億港元,並獲得最高排名。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Gome Finance Technology.
在下面的圖表中,我們着重討論了國美金融科技的不同所有權群體。
![ownership-breakdown](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240625/0-9d29320f91a2484fc2d127c09c760842-0-153babadb497c7e2f9bab97c0258f1ef.png/big)
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Gome Finance Technology?
機構股東缺位,這是什麼告訴我們有關於國美金融科技的情況?
Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.
通常,不活躍的小公司缺少機構投資者,但大公司缺少機構投資者則不太常見。
There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. It is also possible that fund managers don't own the stock because they aren't convinced it will perform well. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Gome Finance Technology, for yourself, below.
機構投資用戶可能沒有注意到新上市的小公司,因爲大型的基金經理人不可能佔領公司的重大份額,導致基金類型缺位的可能性非常大。而機構投資者因爲對公司未來表現不確定而未持有該股票。你可以自己看看國美金融科技的歷史營業收入情況。
![earnings-and-revenue-growth](https://usnewsfile.moomoo.com/public/MM-PersistNewsContentImage/7781/20240625/0-9d29320f91a2484fc2d127c09c760842-1-dd7791c577361a896c15a38a06fe871e.png/big)
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Gome Finance Technology. Our data shows that Juan Du is the largest shareholder with 61% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Chun-Shun Ko is the second largest shareholder, holding 13%.
我們注意到,對國美金融科技的投資基金不能佔據重要的股份。我們的數據顯示,Juan Du是最大的股東,擁有61%的股份。這意味着他們控制了公司未來的利益。Chun-Shun Ko 成爲第二大股東,持有13%的股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但還是研究分析師的建議,以深入了解股票預期表現,是一個好習慣。就我們所知,該公司沒有分析師覆蓋,因此可能沒有引起注意。
Insider Ownership Of Gome Finance Technology
國美金融科技的內部股權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Gome Finance Technology Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just HK$1.2b, and insiders have HK$456m worth of shares in their own names. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息表明,內部人士在國美金融科技佔有重要的股權。市值只有12億港元,內部人士自己擁有價值4.56億港元的股份,這在業界是非常罕見的。了解這些內部人士最近是否一直在購買股票可能有幫助。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆(包括零售投資者)擁有公司的14%股份,因此在公司政策不與大股東同步時,這個股份的大小雖然相當可觀,但可能不足以改變整個公司的決策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Gome Finance Technology is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
我認爲深入了解公司的股權結構非常有趣,但要真正了解情況,我們還需要考慮其他信息。要知道,在我們的投資分析中,Gome Finance Technology顯示了1個警告標誌,您應該知道……
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我們免費的潛力股票收藏,這些股票具有有利的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或電郵 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,也可以發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com