Sinoma Science & Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:002080) Market Cap Dropped CN¥1.2b Last Week; Public Companies Bore the Brunt
Sinoma Science & Technology Co.,Ltd.'s (SZSE:002080) Market Cap Dropped CN¥1.2b Last Week; Public Companies Bore the Brunt
Key Insights
主要见解
- Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd's significant public companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 60% of the company is held by a single shareholder (China National Building Material Company Limited)
- Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 中材科技的重要上市公司所有权表明,核心决策受到来自更大公众股东的影响。
- 公司的60%由一个股东持有(中国建材股份有限公司)。
- 所有权研究和分析师预测数据有助于更好地了解股票市场的机会。
A look at the shareholders of Sinoma Science & Technology Co.,Ltd. (SZSE:002080) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 60% stake, public companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
观察中材科技股份有限公司(深交所:002080)的股东可以告诉我们哪个群体最有权力。公共公司持有最多的股权,占60%。换句话说,这个群体面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。
As market cap fell to CN¥22b last week, public companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
由于市值上周跌至220亿元,公共公司将面临该公司股东中最大的损失。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd.
在下图中,我们放大了中材科技股份有限公司不同的所有权群体。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd?
机构投资者对中材科技股份有限公司有何看法?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。
We can see that Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我们可以看到,中材科技股份有限公司确实拥有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司的很大一部分股票。这表明在专业投资者中有一定的信誉。但我们不能仅凭这个事实,因为机构有时也会做出糟糕的投资决策,就像其他人一样。如果两个大型机构投资者同时试图卖出一只股票,很常见看到股价大幅下跌。因此,值得查看中材科技股份有限公司过去的收益轨迹(如下所示)。当然,也要记住还有其他因素要考虑。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd. The company's largest shareholder is China National Building Material Company Limited, with ownership of 60%. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. National Council for Social Security Fund is the second largest shareholder owning 1.1% of common stock, and China Asset Management Co. Ltd. holds about 0.9% of the company stock.
我们注意到对中材科技股份有限公司没有任何有意义的对冲基金投资。该公司的最大股东是中国建材股份有限公司,持股60%。由于持有如此巨大的股权,我们推断他们对公司未来有重大控制权。全国社会保障基金理事会是第二大股东,拥有普通股的1.1%,而中国资产管理股份有限公司持有公司股票的0.9%左右。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
尽管研究公司机构所有权数据是有意义的,但了解分析师的情绪也很有意义,以了解市场的走向。因为有很多分析师正在跟踪这个股票,所以看看他们的预测可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd
中材科技股份有限公司的内部所有权
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。
We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.
我们注意到我们的数据并没有显示任何董事会成员拥有股份。董事会成员至少拥有一些个人持仓是不寻常的,因此我们的数据可能有缺陷。下一步是检查CEO的薪酬水平。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 32% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
看来私营公司持有大华股份的9.0%。仅从这个事实中很难得出任何结论,所以值得调查一下这些私营公司的所有人是谁。有时内部人员或其他相关方可能会通过一个单独的私营公司拥有公开公司的股份。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有权
Public companies currently own 60% of Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
公共公司目前拥有中材科技股份有限公司的60%股票。我们不能确定,但这很可能是一种战略股份。这些企业可能非常相似,或者彼此合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Sinoma Science & TechnologyLtd is showing 4 warning signs in our investment analysis , you should know about...
虽然考虑到拥有一家公司的不同群体确实很值得,但还有其他更重要的因素。请注意,中材科技股份有限公司显示出投资分析中的四个警告信号,您应该知道......
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最终,未来最重要。您可以在这份关于该公司分析师预测的免费报告中获取有关信息。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或电邮 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,也可以发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com