share_log

Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 84%

Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 84%

诺斯罗普格鲁曼公司(NYSE:NOC)是机构投资者的首选,他们持有84%的股份。
Simply Wall St ·  06/25 08:25

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Northrop Grumman's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 9 shareholders own 52% of the company
  • Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
  • 机构持股比例显著高,意味着诺斯罗普格鲁曼的股票价格对他们的交易行为极为敏感。
  • 前9大股东拥有该公司的52%股份。
  • 分析师预测以及所有者数据可以给我们提供有关业务前景的强烈想法。

If you want to know who really controls Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 84% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果您想知道谁真正控制着诺斯罗普格鲁曼公司(纽交所:NOC),那么您必须查看它的股份登记组成。 持有该公司84%股份的是机构,即这个群体可以从其投资于该公司中最多获利(或最多损失)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. As a result, a sizeable amount of institutional money invested in a firm is generally viewed as a positive attribute.

因为机构所有者拥有庞大的资源和流动性,他们的投资决策往往带有很大的分量,尤其是对于个人投资者来说。因此,机构投资在一家公司中的大量资金通常被视为一个积极因素。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Northrop Grumman.

在下面的图表中,我们放大了诺斯罗普格鲁曼的不同所有权群体。

ownership-breakdown
NYSE:NOC Ownership Breakdown June 25th 2024
纽交所:NOC所有权分析-2024年6月25日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Northrop Grumman?

机构所有权告诉我们有关诺斯罗普格鲁曼的什么信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

We can see that Northrop Grumman does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Northrop Grumman's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看出诺斯罗普格鲁曼确实拥有机构投资者,并且他们持有该公司的相当大部分股票。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经观察了这只股票并喜欢它。但是,就像其他人一样,他们也可能错。当多个机构拥有一只股票时,存在着它们处于“拥挤交易”的风险。当这种交易出现问题时,多方可能会竞相迅速卖出股票。这种风险在一个没有成长历史的公司中更高。您可以看到诺斯罗普格鲁曼的历史收益和营业收入,但请记住,情况总是更加复杂。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NYSE:NOC Earnings and Revenue Growth June 25th 2024
纽交所:NOC营收与收益增长率分析-2024年6月25日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Northrop Grumman. Our data shows that Capital Research and Management Company is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.2% by the third-largest shareholder.

机构投资者持有该公司的50%以上,因此他们可能强烈影响董事会的决策。我们注意到对于诺斯罗普格鲁曼来说,对冲基金投资并不重要。我们的数据显示,Capital Research and Management Company是最大的股东,持有11%的流通股。为了获得背景信息,第二大股东持有约9.5%的流通股,而第三大股东持有8.2%的流通股。

We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.

我们还观察到,前9大股东持有超过股份注册的一半,还有一些小股东平衡大股东的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

尽管研究公司的机构持股可以增加您的研究价值,但研究分析师的建议也是一个好习惯,以更深入地了解股票的预期表现。有相当数量的分析师关注该股,因此了解他们对未来的总体观点可能很有用。

Insider Ownership Of Northrop Grumman

诺斯罗普格鲁曼的内部股权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

当内部人持股情况表明领导层思考和公司真正所有者一样时,内部所有权是积极的。然而,高达内部人士所有权也可能为公司内的小团体带来巨大的权力。在某些情况下,这可能是负面的。

Our data suggests that insiders own under 1% of Northrop Grumman Corporation in their own names. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$149m worth of shares. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我们的数据表明,内部人员以自己的名义仅拥有不到1%的诺斯罗普格鲁曼公司股份。由于它是一家大公司,我们只期望内部人员拥有少量股份。但值得注意的是,他们拥有价值1.49亿美元的股份。看到董事会成员拥有股份是好事,但是了解这些内部人员是否一直在买入也可能值得考虑。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 10% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通大众--包括零售投资者--拥有公司10%的股份,因此不能轻易被忽视。虽然这种所有权规模很大,但如果决策与其他大股东不一致,可能不足以改变公司政策。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Northrop Grumman that you should be aware of.

尽管考虑拥有公司的不同群体非常重要,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已经识别出了诺斯罗普格鲁曼存在的2个警告信号,您应该了解这些信号。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发