State or Government Own 20% of Industrial Securities Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:601377) Shares but Retail Investors Control 53% of the Company
State or Government Own 20% of Industrial Securities Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:601377) Shares but Retail Investors Control 53% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Industrial SecuritiesLtd by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 25 shareholders own 46% of the company
- 12% of Industrial SecuritiesLtd is held by Institutions
- 零售投資者對興業證券有重要控制意味着普通公衆有更多的權力來影響管理和治理上的決策。
- 前 25 名股東擁有該公司的 46%。
- 12%的興業證券由機構持有。
If you want to know who really controls Industrial Securities Co.,Ltd. (SHSE:601377), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 53% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正掌控着興業證券股份有限公司(SHSE:601377),那麼你就必須看看其股東登記簿的構成。我們可以看到,佔有53%的零售投資者擁有該公司的絕大部分股權,也就是說,如果股票上漲,這個群體最有利益(或者如果出現下滑,他們最容易失去利益)。 與之相比,國有部門或政府所持有的股份僅佔該公司的20%。在下面的圖表中,我們放大了興業證券的不同所有權群體。
Meanwhile, state or government make up 20% of the company's shareholders.
同時,國家或政府佔公司股東的20%。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Industrial SecuritiesLtd.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了興業證券的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Industrial SecuritiesLtd?
興業證券有哪些機構投資者?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Industrial SecuritiesLtd. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Industrial SecuritiesLtd's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在興業證券中佔有相當大的股權。這可能表明,該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。但是,在依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證時最好保持警惕,因爲他們也會犯錯誤。如果多個機構同時改變對一支股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得看看下面的興業證券收入歷史記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Industrial SecuritiesLtd. Our data shows that Fujian Provincial Department of Finance is the largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.7% and 3.2% of the stock.
我們注意到,對興業證券股份有限公司持有的股份中,福建省財政廳持股量最大,佔比20%。與之相比,第二大和第三大股東分別持有約8.7%和3.2%的股份。我們的數據顯示,對興業證券沒有明顯的對沖基金投資。
A deeper look at our ownership data shows that the top 25 shareholders collectively hold less than half of the register, suggesting a large group of small holders where no single shareholder has a majority.
對我們的所有權數據進行更深入的研究表明,前25名股東的持股總額不到註冊表的一半,表明有一個小股東的大群體,其中沒有單個股東擁有多數股份。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以增加您的研究價值,但研究分析師建議是了解股票預期表現的更深入的做法。相當多的分析師都對該股票進行了研究,因此您可以輕鬆地查看預測增長。
Insider Ownership Of Industrial SecuritiesLtd
興業證券Ltd的內部股權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,在管轄範圍之間會有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終對董事會負責。但是,經理擔任執行董事會成員並非不尋常,特別是如果他們是創始人或CEO。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. Not all jurisdictions have the same rules around disclosing insider ownership, and it is possible we have missed something, here. So you can click here learn more about the CEO.
看起來,私營企業擁有安徽皖能電力股票的58%。這值得深入挖掘。如果相關方,如內部人士,在其中一傢俬營企業中擁有利益,那麼應該在年度報告中披露。私人企業也可能對公司有戰略利益。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, collectively holds 53% of Industrial SecuritiesLtd shares. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
大部分由個體投資者組成的普通公衆共持有興業證券53%的股份。這種所有權水平使得來自更廣泛公衆的投資者在決定董事會組成、高管薪酬和股息支付比率等關鍵政策決策方面有一定的影響力。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 14%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們可以看到,私營公司持有該公司已發行股份的14%。這值得更深入地研究。如果相關方,如內部人士,對其中一傢俬有公司有利益,那麼這應在年度報告中披露。私營公司也可能對該公司具有戰略興趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Industrial SecuritiesLtd better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Industrial SecuritiesLtd (1 is potentially serious) that you should be aware of.
總之,考慮到許多其他因素,了解興業證券還需要深入探究。例如,我們已經發現了3個關於興業證券的警示信號(其中1個潛在地非常嚴重),你應該對此有所了解。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,只使用公正的方法論,我們的文章並不意味着提供任何金融建議。文章不構成買賣任何股票的建議,也不考慮您的目標或您的財務狀況。我們的目標是帶給您基本數據驅動的長期關注分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St沒有任何股票頭寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
對本文有反饋?關於內容有所顧慮?直接和我們聯繫。或者發送電子郵件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。