share_log

After Losing 22% in the Past Year, Amplitude, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMPL) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

After Losing 22% in the Past Year, Amplitude, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMPL) Institutional Owners Must Be Relieved by the Recent Gain

在过去的一年中,Amplitude,Inc.(纳斯达克:AMPL)已经损失了22%,机构股东对最近的收益感到宽慰
Simply Wall St ·  06/27 06:22

Key Insights

关键见解

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Amplitude implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders own 15% of Amplitude
  • 机构对Amplitude的大量持股意味着它们对公司的股价具有重大影响
  • 共有8名投资者持有该公司的多数股权,所有权为51%
  • 内部人士拥有Amplitude15%的股份

If you want to know who really controls Amplitude, Inc. (NASDAQ:AMPL), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 49% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道谁真正控制着Amplitude, Inc.(纳斯达克股票代码:AMPL),那么你必须看看其股票登记处的构成。而持有最大份额的集团是拥有49%所有权的机构。换句话说,该集团将从对公司的投资中获得最多(或损失最大)。

After a year of 22% losses, last week's 5.2% gain would be welcomed by institutional investors as a possible sign that returns might start trending higher.

在经历了22%的亏损之后,上周5.2%的涨幅将受到机构投资者的欢迎,这可能表明回报率可能开始呈上升趋势。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Amplitude, beginning with the chart below.

让我们从下图开始,深入研究Amplitude的每种所有者。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:AMPL Ownership Breakdown June 27th 2024
纳斯达克公司:AMPL 所有权明细 2024 年 6 月 27 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Amplitude?

关于Amplitude,机构所有权告诉我们什么?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构在向自己的投资者报告时通常会根据基准来衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会对股票更加热情。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在册,尤其是在它们正在成长的情况下。

We can see that Amplitude does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Amplitude's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看到,Amplitude确实有机构投资者;他们持有公司很大一部分股票。这意味着在这些机构工作的分析师已经看过这只股票,他们很喜欢。但是就像其他人一样,他们可能错了。当多家机构拥有一只股票时,总是存在处于 “拥挤交易” 的风险。当这样的交易出错时,多方可能会竞相快速出售股票。对于没有增长历史的公司,这种风险更高。你可以在下面看到Amplitude的历史收益和收入,但请记住,故事总是有更多内容。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:AMPL Earnings and Revenue Growth June 27th 2024
纳斯达克股票代码:AMPL 收益和收入增长 2024 年 6 月 27 日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Amplitude. Sequoia Capital Operations LLC is currently the company's largest shareholder with 8.4% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Battery Ventures and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 7.3%. In addition, we found that Spenser Skates, the CEO has 5.2% of the shares allocated to their name.

对冲基金在Amplitude中的股票不多。红杉资本运营有限责任公司目前是该公司的最大股东,已发行股份的8.4%。第二和第三大股东是Battery Ventures和T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.,其持股量相等,为7.3%。此外,我们发现首席执行官Spenser Skates将5.2%的股份分配给了他们的名字。

On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones.

经过进一步检查,我们发现公司一半以上的股份由前8名股东持有,这表明较大股东的利益在一定程度上被较小的股东所平衡。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

虽然研究公司的机构所有权可以为您的研究增加价值,但研究分析师的建议以更深入地了解股票的预期表现也是一种好做法。有很多分析师在报道该股,因此可能也值得一看他们的预测。

Insider Ownership Of Amplitude

Amplitude 的内部所有权

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

尽管内部人士的确切定义可能是主观的,但几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理层经营业务,但首席执行官将对董事会负责,即使他或她是董事会成员。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部所有权是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,这使其他股东更难追究董事会对决策的责任。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Amplitude, Inc.. Insiders own US$155m worth of shares in the US$1.0b company. That's quite meaningful. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我们的最新数据表明,内部人士拥有Amplitude, Inc.合理比例的股份。内部人士拥有这家价值10亿美元的公司价值1.55亿美元的股份。这很有意义。很高兴看到这样的投资水平。你可以在这里查看这些内部人士最近是否在买入。

General Public Ownership

一般公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 20% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公众——包括散户投资者——拥有该公司20%的股份,因此不容忽视。尽管这个群体不一定能做主,但它肯定会对公司的运作方式产生真正的影响。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股权所有权

With an ownership of 16%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股权公司拥有16%的所有权,可以在制定以价值创造为重点的公司战略方面发挥作用。有些人可能会喜欢这样,因为私募股权有时是追究管理层责任的激进分子。但是其他时候,私募股权在公司上市后正在售罄。

Next Steps:

后续步骤:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Amplitude , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

我觉得看看究竟谁拥有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正获得见解,我们还需要考虑其他信息。例如,投资风险的幽灵无处不在。我们已经确定了Amplitude的两个警告信号,了解它们应该是您投资过程的一部分。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但归根结底,决定这家企业所有者的表现的是未来,而不是过去。因此,我们认为最好看一下这份免费报告,该报告显示了分析师是否预测了更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的数字是使用过去十二个月的数据计算得出的,这些数据是指截至财务报表日期当月最后一天的12个月期间。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发