Fenbo Holdings Limited's (NASDAQ:FEBO) Senior Key Executive Kin Shing Li Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 44% Last Week
Fenbo Holdings Limited's (NASDAQ:FEBO) Senior Key Executive Kin Shing Li Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 44% Last Week
Key Insights
主要见解
- Fenbo Holdings' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- The largest shareholder of the company is Kin Shing Li with a 72% stake
- Past performance of a company along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- Fenbo控股的重要内部持股表明了对公司扩张的固有利益。
- 公司最大的股东是李健升,持股比例为72%。
- 公司过去的业绩以及所有权数据,有助于形成对业务前景的强烈想法。
If you want to know who really controls Fenbo Holdings Limited (NASDAQ:FEBO), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 81% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
如果你想知道谁在真正控制Fenbo控股有限公司(纳斯达克:FEBO),那么你就必须看它的股份登记册的构成。在这家公司中拥有最多股份的团体,精确地说,约占81%,是个人内部持股者。换句话说,该团体最可能从他们对公司的投资中获益最多(或失去最多)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$157m market cap following a 44% gain in the stock.
因此,内部人员成为上周得分最高的人,因为该公司股票上涨44%,市值达到1.57亿美元。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Fenbo Holdings, beginning with the chart below.
让我们深入了解Fenbo控股的每种所有者类型,从下面的图表开始。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Fenbo Holdings?
机构缺乏Fenbo控股的股权告诉我们什么?
Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.
机构不拥有股票的原因有多种解释。最常见的是公司相对于管理基金过小,因此机构不必仔细审查公司。也有可能是基金经理人不持有股票,因为他们不确信该股票表现良好。机构投资者可能并不认为该业务的历史增长令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己看到Zibuyu Group的过去营业收入表现。
There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Fenbo Holdings' earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.
机构不持有一只股票的原因可能有多种解释。最常见的是,相对于管理的资金来说,该公司的规模太小,因此机构根本不会仔细研究该公司。或者,可能有关于该公司的某些事情使机构投资者远离它。Fenbo控股的收入和营业收入记录(如下图所示)可能对机构投资者没有说服力,或者他们根本没有仔细研究该业务。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Fenbo Holdings. Our data suggests that Kin Shing Li, who is also the company's Senior Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 72%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. The second and third largest shareholders are Ming Pang Fung and Tong Lam Yuk, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 4.5%.
我们注意到,对于Fenbo控股而言,对冲基金没有实质性的投资。我们的数据表明,公司的高级关键执行官李健升持有最多的股份,达到72%。当内部人员持有一家公司的大量股票时,投资者认为这是一个积极的迹象,因为它表明内部人员愿意将他们的财富绑定在公司的未来上。第二大和第三大股东是冯明鹏和吕东林,他们持有相同数量的股份,占4.5%。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。分析师观点也可以达到相同的目的。我们的信息表明,这只股票没有任何分析师覆盖,所以它可能不是很出名。
Insider Ownership Of Fenbo Holdings
Fenbo控股的内部所有权
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Fenbo Holdings Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a US$128m stake in this US$157m business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.
我们最近的数据表明,内部人员拥有Fenbo控股有限公司的大部分所有权。这意味着他们可以共同为公司做出决策。所以他们在这家价值1.57亿美元的公司中拥有1280万美元的持股。大多数人会高兴看到董事会与他们一起投资。你可能希望免费发现他们是否一直在买卖。
General Public Ownership
一般大众所有权
With a 19% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Fenbo Holdings. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
拥有19%的一般公众,主要由个人投资者组成,对Fenbo控股有一定的影响。尽管这种所有权的规模可能不足以左右其政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Fenbo Holdings , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
虽然考虑拥有一家公司的不同群体很有价值,但还有其他更重要的因素。可以考虑到投资风险一直存在的威胁。我们已经确定了Fenbo控股的两个警告信号,了解它们应该是你的投资过程的一部分。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
当然,这也可能不是最好的股票交易。因此,您可能想看看我们免费的潜力股票收藏,这些股票具有有利的财务状况。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com
对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。