share_log

Is Regal Rexnord (NYSE:RRX) Using Too Much Debt?

Is Regal Rexnord (NYSE:RRX) Using Too Much Debt?

Regal Rexnord (纽交所:RRX) 是否使用了过多债务?
Simply Wall St ·  07/03 07:32

Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We can see that Regal Rexnord Corporation (NYSE:RRX) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

有人说,波动性,而不是债务,是投资者思考风险的最佳方式,但沃伦·巴菲特曾说过一句名言:“波动性远非风险的代名词。”当我们思考一家公司的风险有多大时,我们总是喜欢考虑其债务的用途,因为债务过载可能导致破产。我们可以看到,富豪雷克斯诺德公司(纽约证券交易所代码:RRX)确实在其业务中使用了债务。但更重要的问题是:这笔债务会带来多大的风险?

When Is Debt A Problem?

债务何时会成为问题?

Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

当企业无法通过自由现金流或以诱人的价格筹集资金来轻松履行这些义务时,债务和其他负债就会成为风险。在最坏的情况下,如果公司无法向债权人付款,它可能会破产。尽管这种情况并不常见,但我们经常会看到负债公司永久稀释股东,因为贷款人迫使他们以不良价格筹集资金。当然,债务的好处在于它通常代表廉价资本,尤其是当它以高回报率进行再投资的能力取代公司的稀释时。当我们检查债务水平时,我们首先要同时考虑现金和债务水平。

What Is Regal Rexnord's Net Debt?

Regal Rexnord 的净负债是多少?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Regal Rexnord had US$6.24b of debt in March 2024, down from US$7.28b, one year before. On the flip side, it has US$465.3m in cash leading to net debt of about US$5.78b.

你可以点击下图查看历史数字,但它显示富豪雷克斯诺德在2024年3月的债务为62.4亿美元,低于一年前的72.8亿美元。另一方面,它拥有4.653亿美元的现金,净负债约为57.8亿美元。

debt-equity-history-analysis
NYSE:RRX Debt to Equity History July 3rd 2024
纽约证券交易所:RRX 债务与股本的比率历史记录 2024 年 7 月 3 日

How Healthy Is Regal Rexnord's Balance Sheet?

Regal Rexnord 的资产负债表有多健康?

According to the last reported balance sheet, Regal Rexnord had liabilities of US$1.25b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$7.55b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of US$465.3m and US$828.1m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$7.50b.

根据上次报告的资产负债表,Regal Rexnord的负债为12.5亿美元,12个月后到期的负债为75.5亿美元。另一方面,它有一年内到期的现金为4.653亿美元,还有价值8.281亿美元的应收账款。因此,其负债超过其现金和(短期)应收账款总额750亿美元。

This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$8.79b. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

相对于其87.9亿美元的市值,这是一座巨大的杠杆率。这表明,如果公司需要迅速支撑资产负债表,股东将被严重稀释。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).

我们通过以下方法来衡量公司的债务负担与其盈利能力:将其净负债除以利息、税项、折旧和摊销前的收益(EBITDA),并计算其利息和税前收益(EBIT)支付利息支出(利息保障)的难易程度。这种方法的优势在于,我们既考虑了债务的绝对数量(包括净负债与息税折旧摊销前利润),也考虑了与该债务相关的实际利息支出(及其利息覆盖率)。

While Regal Rexnord's debt to EBITDA ratio (4.6) suggests that it uses some debt, its interest cover is very weak, at 1.7, suggesting high leverage. So shareholders should probably be aware that interest expenses appear to have really impacted the business lately. Fortunately, Regal Rexnord grew its EBIT by 5.2% in the last year, slowly shrinking its debt relative to earnings. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Regal Rexnord can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

尽管Regal Rexnord的债务与息税折旧摊销前利润比率(4.6)表明它使用了部分债务,但其利息保障非常薄弱,为1.7,这表明杠杆率很高。因此,股东可能应该意识到,最近利息支出似乎确实影响了业务。幸运的是,Regal Rexnord去年将其息税前利润增长了5.2%,其债务相对于收益的比例逐渐减少。资产负债表显然是分析债务时需要关注的领域。但最终,该业务的未来盈利能力将决定Regal Rexnord能否随着时间的推移加强其资产负债表。因此,如果你想看看专业人士的想法,你可能会发现这份关于分析师利润预测的免费报告很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, Regal Rexnord produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 67% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This cold hard cash means it can reduce its debt when it wants to.

最后,尽管税务人员可能喜欢会计利润,但贷款人只接受冷硬现金。因此,合乎逻辑的步骤是研究息税前利润与实际自由现金流相匹配的比例。在过去三年中,Regal Rexnord产生了稳健的自由现金流,相当于其息税前利润的67%,与我们的预期差不多。这种冷硬现金意味着它可以在需要时减少债务。

Our View

我们的观点

While Regal Rexnord's net debt to EBITDA makes us cautious about it, its track record of covering its interest expense with its EBIT is no better. But on the brighter side of life, its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow leaves us feeling more frolicsome. Taking the abovementioned factors together we do think Regal Rexnord's debt poses some risks to the business. While that debt can boost returns, we think the company has enough leverage now. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Regal Rexnord you should know about.

尽管Regal Rexnord的净负债占息税折旧摊销前利润的比例使我们对此持谨慎态度,但其用息税前利润支付利息支出的往绩也没有好转。但从生活中更美好的方面来看,它将息税前利润转换为自由现金流让我们感到更加艰难。综合上述因素,我们确实认为Regal Rexnord的债务对业务构成了一些风险。尽管这笔债务可以提高回报,但我们认为该公司现在有足够的杠杆作用。在分析债务水平时,资产负债表是显而易见的起点。但归根结底,每家公司都可以控制资产负债表之外存在的风险。这些风险可能很难发现。每家公司都有它们,我们发现了一个你应该知道的Regal Rexnord警告标志。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

归根结底,通常最好将注意力集中在没有净负债的公司身上。您可以访问我们的此类公司的特别名单(所有公司都有利润增长记录)。它是免费的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,给编辑团队 (at) simplywallst.com 发送电子邮件。
Simply Wall St的这篇文章本质上是笼统的。我们仅使用公正的方法根据历史数据和分析师的预测提供评论,我们的文章无意作为财务建议。它不构成买入或卖出任何股票的建议,也没有考虑到您的目标或财务状况。我们的目标是为您提供由基本数据驱动的长期重点分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。简而言之,华尔街没有持有任何上述股票的头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对这篇文章有反馈吗?对内容感到担忧?直接联系我们。 或者,发送电子邮件至 editorial-team@simplywallst.com

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发