share_log

Zheshang Securities Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:601878) Stock Price Dropped 3.4% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

Zheshang Securities Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:601878) Stock Price Dropped 3.4% Last Week; Private Companies Would Not Be Happy

浙商证券(SHSE:601878)的股价上周下跌了3.4%;私人公司不会高兴
Simply Wall St ·  07/03 19:08

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Zheshang Securities' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • Zhejiang Communications Investment Group Co., Ltd owns 55% of the company
  • 10% of Zheshang Securities is held by Institutions
  • 浙商证券重要的私人公司持股表明关键决策受到较大公众股东的影响。
  • 浙江通信投资集团有限公司拥有该公司的55%股份。
  • 所有基金类型持有浙商证券10%股份。

Every investor in Zheshang Securities Co., Ltd. (SHSE:601878) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 58% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

每位浙商证券股份投资人都应该知道最强势股东群体,并持有58%股权的是私人公司。这也就是说,如果股票上涨,该群体将获益最多(或这是公司发生倒退的情况下该群体将承受比较大的风险和损失)。

And last week, private companies endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 3.4%.

而上周私人公司承受了最大的损失,因为股票下跌了3.4%。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Zheshang Securities.

让我们更仔细地观察一下不同类型的股东对浙商证券的影响。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:601878 Ownership Breakdown July 3rd 2024
SHSE:601878 2024年7月3日的持股比例

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zheshang Securities?

机构投资者持股消息对浙商证券有什么指示吗?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

机构投资者通常将自己的回报与常见的指数回报进行比较。因此,他们通常会考虑购买包括在相关基准指数中的较大公司。

We can see that Zheshang Securities does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Zheshang Securities' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我们可以看出,浙商证券确实有机构投资者,并且他们持有公司的一定股份。这表明认可的专业投资人比例相对较高,但是仅凭这一事实是不足以依赖的,因为机构投资者有时会做出错误的投资决策,就像所有人一样。当多个机构持有一只股票时,存在“拥挤交易”的风险。当这类交易失败时,多个交易方可能会争相快速出售股票。在一个没有成长历史的公司,这种风险会更高。您可以看到浙商证券的历史收益和营业收入,但要记住故事总是更加复杂的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:601878 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 3rd 2024
SHSE:601878 2024年7月3日的收益和营业收入增长率

Zheshang Securities is not owned by hedge funds. Zhejiang Communications Investment Group Co., Ltd is currently the largest shareholder, with 55% of shares outstanding. With such a huge stake in the ownership, we infer that they have significant control of the future of the company. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 2.7% and 1.8% of the stock.

浙商证券不是由对冲基金持有的,浙江通信投资集团有限公司是目前持有最多股份的股东,持股比例为55%。由于在持有股权方面占据重要位置,我们可以推断他们对公司的未来拥有重要控制权。相比之下,第二和第三大股东持有该公司2.7%和1.8%的股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期性能的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪,也可以实现同样的效果。很多分析师都在关注该股票,看看他们的预测值得不值得。

Insider Ownership Of Zheshang Securities

浙商证券的内部股东

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

虽然内部人士的精确定义可能是主观的,几乎每个人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。管理层最终向董事会负责。但是,如果他们是创始人或CEO,经理成为执行董事会成员并不罕见。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

我们的数据无法确认董事会成员是否持有个人股份。董事会成员至少持有一些个人股份是不寻常的,因此我们的数据可能有缺陷。下一步可行的行动是检查CEO的薪资。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 31% stake in Zheshang Securities. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

通常情况下,普通公众(也就是个人投资者)持有浙商证券的股份达到31%。虽然拥有这么大的股份很可观,但是如果与其他大股东的决策不一致,则可能不足以改变公司方针。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

We can see that Private Companies own 58%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我们可以看到,私人公司持有该公司发行的股份中的58%。单凭这一事实很难得出任何结论,因此值得研究谁拥有这些私人公司的所有权。有时,内部人员或其他相关方通过单独的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Zheshang Securities you should know about.

虽然考虑拥有公司的不同群体很值得,但其他因素更为重要。例如,风险。每个公司都面临风险,我们在浙商证券中发现了1个警示信号,需要了解。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发