share_log

Recent 5.5% Pullback Would Hurt Warom Technology Incorporated Company (SHSE:603855) Insiders

Recent 5.5% Pullback Would Hurt Warom Technology Incorporated Company (SHSE:603855) Insiders

最近5.5%的回撤会对华荣股份(SHSE:603855)的内部人员造成伤害。
Simply Wall St ·  07/03 19:25

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Insiders appear to have a vested interest in Warom Technology's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
  • The top 5 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Institutions own 21% of Warom Technology
  • 内部人似乎对华荣股份的增长怀有浓厚的兴趣,这可以从他们持有的较大比例股份看出。
  • 该公司的前五大股东拥有51%的股份。
  • 机构持有华荣股份21%的股份。

A look at the shareholders of Warom Technology Incorporated Company (SHSE:603855) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 54% to be precise, is individual insiders. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

观察华荣股份公司(上海证券交易所:603855)的股东可以知道哪个集团最强大。持有该公司股份最多的集团(确切地说约占54%)是个人内部人。换句话说,该集团面临着最大的上行潜力(或下行风险)。

And last week, insiders endured the biggest losses as the stock fell by 5.5%.

上周,内部人遭受最大损失,因为股票下跌了5.5%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Warom Technology, beginning with the chart below.

让我们深入了解华荣股份每种所有者类型,并从下面的图表开始。

ownership-breakdown
SHSE:603855 Ownership Breakdown July 3rd 2024
SHSE:603855所有权结构2024年7月3日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Warom Technology?

机构所有权对华荣股份有何启示?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

机构通常在向自己的投资者报告时会针对一个基准进行衡量,因此一旦某只股票被纳入主要指数,他们通常会更加热衷于该股票。我们预计大多数公司都会有一些机构在登记簿上,尤其是那些正在增长的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Warom Technology. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Warom Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如您所见,机构投资者在华荣股份中持有相当比例的股份。这意味着为这些机构工作的分析师已经观察了该股票并喜欢它。但就像任何其他人一样,他们可能是错误的。当多个机构拥有一支股票时,总会存在他们在“拥挤的交易”中的风险。当这样的交易出现偏差时,多个各方可能会竞相快速抛售股票。在一个没有增长历史的企业中,这种风险更高。您可以查看华荣股份的历史盈利和营业收入,但请记住,故事总是更为复杂。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
SHSE:603855 Earnings and Revenue Growth July 3rd 2024
SHSE:603855盈利和营业收入增长2024年7月3日

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Warom Technology. Our data shows that Zhi Rong Hu is the largest shareholder with 34% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.3% by the third-largest shareholder. Jiang Li, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

对于华荣股份,对冲基金持有的股份不多。我们的数据显示,Zhi Rong Hu是持有34%流通股的最大股东。为了更好地理解,第二大股东持有流通股的约6.5%,紧随其后的第三大股东拥有流通股的4.3%。同时,第三大股东江丽还担任董事会成员的职位。

To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.

为了使我们的研究更有趣,我们发现前5位股东控制了该公司超过一半的股份,这意味着该组人对公司的决策具有相当大的影响力。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究机构所有权是衡量和过滤股票预期表现的好方法。通过研究分析师的情绪也可以实现同样的目的。由于有相当数量的分析师涵盖这支股票,因此了解他们对未来的整体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of Warom Technology

华荣股份的内部人持有超过一半的股份。这赋予了他们很大的权力。因此,他们在这个70亿人民币的业务中持有38亿元的股份。大多数人会高兴地看到董事会与他们一起进行投资。您可能希望免费了解他们是否一直在购买或出售。

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

内部人员的定义在不同国家可能会稍有不同,但董事会成员始终算入其中。公司管理负责经营业务,但即使首席执行官是董事会成员,他或她也必须对董事会负责。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多数人认为内部所有权是积极的,因为它可以表示董事会与其他股东的利益相一致。但是,在某些场合下,这个团体的权力过于集中。

It seems that insiders own more than half the Warom Technology Incorporated Company stock. This gives them a lot of power. So they have a CN¥3.8b stake in this CN¥7.0b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish todiscover (for free) if they have been buying or selling.

尽管值得考虑拥有一家公司的不同集团,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已发现华荣股份存在1个警告信号,在投资这里之前,您应该注意它。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 25% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

普通公众(包括零售投资者)拥有该公司25%的股份,并因此不能轻视他们。虽然这种持股规模可能不足以扭转政策决策,但他们仍然可以对公司政策产生集体影响。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Warom Technology that you should be aware of before investing here.

虽然考虑拥有公司的不同集团的意义重大,但还有其他更重要的因素。例如,我们已发现华荣科技有一个警告信号,如果您在此处投资,应该注意它。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最终,决定该业务所有者将获得多大利益的是未来而非过去。因此,我们认为最好查看此免费报告,以了解分析师是否预测更光明的未来。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发