share_log

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as PureCycle Technologies, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PCT) Recent 9.8% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as PureCycle Technologies, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PCT) Recent 9.8% Drop Adds to One-year Losses

随着PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:PCT)最近的9.8%下跌加剧一年来的亏损,机构投资者可能会采取剧烈行动。
Simply Wall St ·  07/04 09:24

Key Insights

主要见解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies PureCycle Technologies' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 8 shareholders own 53% of the company
  • Insider ownership in PureCycle Technologies is 11%
  • 显著的高机构持股意味着PureCycle Technologies的股票价格对他们的交易行为非常敏感。
  • 前8大股东拥有公司的53%的股份。
  • PureCycle Technologies的内部持股为11%。

Every investor in PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:PCT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 44% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每一位PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (纳斯达克代码:PCT) 的投资者应该意识到最权威的股东群体。由于拥有44%的股份,机构是公司中持有最多股份的股东群体。也就是说,这个群体的投资对公司的收益(或亏损)影响最大。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 9.8% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 49% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. Hence, if weakness in PureCycle Technologies' share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

机构投资者上周看到其持股价值下降9.8%。不用说,最近的损失加剧了股东一年内的49%的亏损,这可能会引起投资者的反感,特别是对于这类股东。机构又被称为"聪明的资金",他们对股票价格的波动有很大影响。因此,如果PureCycle Technologies的股价弱势持续,机构投资者可能会感到被迫抛售股票,这对于个人投资者可能不是理想的结果。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about PureCycle Technologies.

让我们仔细研究一下不同股东类型对PureCycle Technologies的影响。

ownership-breakdown
NasdaqCM:PCT Ownership Breakdown July 4th 2024
NasdaqCM:PCt所有权分解2024年7月4日。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About PureCycle Technologies?

机构投资者的持股情况对PureCycle Technologies意味着什么?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

许多机构衡量其业绩的标准是一个近似于当地市场的指数。因此,他们通常更加关注包括在主要指数中的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in PureCycle Technologies. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at PureCycle Technologies' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所看到的,机构投资者在PureCycle Technologies中拥有相当的股份。这可能表明公司在投资界有一定的信誉度。然而,还是要警惕过分依赖机构投资者带来的所谓认可。他们也有时候会犯错。如果多个机构同时改变对一只股票的看法,你可能会看到股价迅速下跌。因此,值得注意的是PureCycle Technologies下面的盈利历史。当然,未来才是真正重要的。

earnings-and-revenue-growth
NasdaqCM:PCT Earnings and Revenue Growth July 4th 2024
PureCycle Technologies的股份中似乎有18%是由对冲基金控制的。这是有趣的,因为对冲基金可能非常活跃和积极。许多对冲基金寻找可以推高股价的中期催化剂。该公司最大的股东是Sylebra Capital Limited,持股比例为18%。同时,第二大和第三大股东分别持有公司股份的7.7%和5.9%。

It would appear that 18% of PureCycle Technologies shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. The company's largest shareholder is Sylebra Capital Limited, with ownership of 18%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.7% and 5.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

我们的数据显示,PureCycle Technologies的内部人员持有公司价值1亿美元的股票,拥有US$1,00,00,000股份。但需要注意的是,该公司规模仍然很小;有些内部人员可能创立了这个企业。你可以点击这里查看这些内部人员是买入还是卖出。

We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我们深挖了一下,发现前8名股东持有公司注册资本的约53%,这意味着除大股东外,还有一些小股东,从而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

虽然仔细研究公司的机构持股数据是有意义的,但研究分析师对该股票的看法也是有意义的。有相当数量的分析师在跟踪该股票,因此了解他们对于未来发展的总体看法可能会有所帮助。

Insider Ownership Of PureCycle Technologies

公众股东,包括散户投资者,拥有该公司15%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这个群体不能完全掌控公司,但肯定对公司经营产生真正的影响。

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

虽然“内部人士”的明确定义具有主观性,但几乎所有人都认为董事会成员是内部人士。公司管理业务,但首席执行官即使是董事会成员,也要向董事会负责。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常认为内部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情况下,它会使其他股东更难以对董事会的决定进行问责。

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in PureCycle Technologies, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$899m, and insiders have US$100m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我们的信息显示,内部人员在PureCycle Technologies, Inc. 中拥有大量持股。该公司市值仅为8,990万美元,内部人员自有的股份价值1亿美元。我们认为这显示出他们与股东的一致性,但值得注意的是,该公司仍然很小,有些内部人员可能是创业者。你可以点此查看他们是否一直在买卖。

General Public Ownership

一般大众所有权

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 15% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

总体来说,公众股东,包括散户投资者,拥有该公司15%的股份,因此不容忽视。虽然这个群体不能完全掌控公司,但肯定对公司经营产生真正的影响。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有权

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 6.8%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我们的数据显示,私营企业持有公司股份的6.8%。如果有关联方,如内部人员,在其中一家私营企业中持有利益,那么这应该在年度报告中披露。私营企业也可能对公司有战略利益。

Public Company Ownership

上市公司所有权

Public companies currently own 4.8% of PureCycle Technologies stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.

上市公司目前持有PureCycle Technologies的股票4.8%。虽然我们不能确定,但这很可能是一种战略押注。这些企业可能是相似的或者是合作伙伴。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand PureCycle Technologies better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - PureCycle Technologies has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of.

总会考虑到公司股份的不同持有群体,但要更好地了解PureCycle Technologies,我们需要考虑很多其他因素。例如,风险 - PureCycle Technologies有2个警告信号,我们认为你应该了解一下。

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

如果您像我一样,可能希望考虑这家公司是否会增长或缩小。幸运的是,您可以查看此免费报告,显示分析师对其未来的预测。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的数据是使用最后一个财务报表日期结束的为期12个月的数据计算的。这可能与全年年度报告数据不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者,发送电子邮件至editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
这篇文章是Simply Wall St的一般性文章。我们根据历史数据和分析师预测提供评论,只使用公正的方法论,我们的文章并不意味着提供任何金融建议。文章不构成买卖任何股票的建议,也不考虑您的目标或您的财务状况。我们的目标是带给您基本数据驱动的长期关注分析。请注意,我们的分析可能不考虑最新的价格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St没有任何股票头寸。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com

对本文有反馈?关于内容有所顾虑?直接和我们联系。或者发送电子邮件至editorial-team@simplywallst.com。

声明:本内容仅用作提供资讯及教育之目的,不构成对任何特定投资或投资策略的推荐或认可。 更多信息
    抢沙发